On Sunday 21 November 2010 15:05:52 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 16:35 on Sunday 21 November 2010, Mick did > > opine thusly: > > On Sunday 21 November 2010 13:03:48 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > I think you are trying to use the ebuilds too soon. Maybe stick with > > > efl a bit longer. > > > > Thank you Alan, much appreciated. I'll stay with efl for now. It was > > just that the statement of the dev in the link you posted, which > > suggested we should have moved over to 'enlightenment' overlay by now, > > that made me think I should get going on this. > > I thought the same at the time, but you've now shown that the dev's > statement was likely premature
LOL! I think that the whole enchilada is borked at the moment: # emerge -1aDv dev-libs/ecore dev-libs/e_dbus dev-libs/eet dev-libs/eina dev- libs/embryo dev-libs/efreet media-libs/edje media-libs/ethumb media-libs/evas x11-wm/enlightenment enlightenment-base/e_module-notification enlightenment- base/e_module-tclock net-libs/exchange app-text/epdf media-libs/emotion dev- libs/eeze enlightenment-base/e_module-forecasts These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "dev-libs/e_dbus" have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - dev-libs/e_dbus-1.0.0_beta2 (masked by: ~amd64 keyword) For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. However, I have this keyword set up: =dev-libs/e_dbus-9999 ** so I think that it *should* use the cvs and not complain!? Perhaps I'll pass on updating my E17 and leave well alone for another week or two until this transition has bedded in somewhat. -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
