On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Lets grant that the VirtualBox modules are not up to LKML standards.
> That's fine, very little out of the tree is. I'm willing to bet that
> the majority of the issues are silly bugs involving pointer arithmetic
> (the usual cause of these
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 05:51:19 -0800
Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:17:07 +0100
> > Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> >
> >> The 22/11/11, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >>
> >> > I use virtualbox and it's the one I recommend.
> >> >
> >> >
On 2011-11-23, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Wed, November 23, 2011 12:06 am, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:29:23 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>>> What I like about VBox is that you get all the useful bits in the
>>> open-source version.
>>
>> Except USB support.
>
> Huh?
The last t
The 23/11/11, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> I also got "random memory corruption" when compiling large packages with
> simple kernel configurations and no "out-of-tree" modules present on the
> system.
>
> Do you have any evidence to proof that this randomness is actually caused
> by VB modules and not s
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:17:07 +0100
> Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>
>> The 22/11/11, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>> > I use virtualbox and it's the one I recommend.
>> >
>> > The kernel modules are no better and no worse than any other
>> > out-of-tr
On Wed, November 23, 2011 1:59 pm, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> The 23/11/11, Joseph Davis wrote:
>> I agree a list of issues, just broad ones, would be helpful.
>>
>> I am interested in VMs, so knowing which ones have what problems,
>> and my own needs, would be help me make a good choice.
>>
>> Plea
The 23/11/11, Joseph Davis wrote:
> I agree a list of issues, just broad ones, would be helpful.
>
> I am interested in VMs, so knowing which ones have what problems,
> and my own needs, would be help me make a good choice.
>
> Please, disparage with details! ;-)
I've already said "random memory
I agree a list of issues, just broad ones, would be helpful.
I am interested in VMs, so knowing which ones have what problems,
and my own needs, would be help me make a good choice.
Please, disparage with details! ;-)
Thanks - Joseph
Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 23/11/11, Alan McKinnon wrote:
The 23/11/11, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:17:07 +0100
> Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> > You're wrong. Using the virtualbox module means you turn the kernel to
> > "tained crap" because of the number of problems it causes, including
> > random memory curruption.
>
> Care to back tha
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:17:07 +0100
Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> The 22/11/11, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> > I use virtualbox and it's the one I recommend.
> >
> > The kernel modules are no better and no worse than any other
> > out-of-tree modules.
>
> You're wrong. Using the virtualbox module mean
The 22/11/11, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I use virtualbox and it's the one I recommend.
>
> The kernel modules are no better and no worse than any other
> out-of-tree modules.
You're wrong. Using the virtualbox module means you turn the kernel to
"tained crap" because of the number of problems it c
11 matches
Mail list logo
