On Sun, 5 Apr 2015 00:52:30 -0400, Boricua Siempre wrote:
> Geentoo power first quantum super computer in 2101 and power all
> galactic cofederation computers.
> It was first supercomputer to crack secret of time travel in 2307 and
> become self conchious in 2402.
Add this to /usr/portage/profile
Thank for de replies
My english so bad because I from the future when english death languaje.
Geentoo power first quantum super computer in 2101 and power all galactic
cofederation computers.
It was first supercomputer to crack secret of time travel in 2307 and
become self conchious in 2402.
I am
On 04/04/2015 13:35, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
>>
>> What a revelation about at least a minority of Gentoo users !
>> -- philosophers of science + math, besides well-trained physicists.
>>
>
> I think at least half of us on the Council have degrees i
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Philip Webb wrote:
>
> What a revelation about at least a minority of Gentoo users !
> -- philosophers of science + math, besides well-trained physicists.
>
I think at least half of us on the Council have degrees in the
physical sciences.
I work mostly with scient
150404 waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> Mathematics is our basic tool to build these theories.
> A fundamental question is whether the mathematical axioms exist "for real"
> and we just discovered them or are they grounded by the functionality
> of our mind/brain ? In the latter case,
> it would proba
On 04/04/2015 02:50, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
>> The scientific community is very well aware that it cannot answer the
>> > question "why?", and in fact, true science doesn't even try.
>> >
>> > Science never proves anything, it only fails to disprove a realistic
>> > workable model.
>> >
>> > F
wrote:
> We should not forget that the lasers that can be found in CD drives,
> the magnetic heads in modern hard disks, and also every FET are
> working with technology that is based on quantum effects. I never
Correction: I meant TFET and not FET.
--
Regards
wabe
On Saturday, April 04, 2015 2:50:37 AM waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> One thing that I don't understand is, why the fact that gravity can be
> described by a theory of bended space-time is leading to the assumption,
> that there really exists such a "rubber cloth" like space.
I think it's because h
Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Friday, April 03, 2015 5:05:35 AM waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Boricua Siempre wrote:
> >
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > I have reading of quantum computing and I want know what operating
> > > systems are use in quantum computers. And I read quantum computers
> >
> >
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Peter Humphrey
> wrote:
> > On Friday 03 April 2015 17:11:11 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> >> That's the problem with science in general. The one thing it may
> >> never be able to answer is "why?".
> >
> > I think that's the crux of the pr
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 03/04/2015 23:11, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > That's the problem with science in general. The one thing it may
> > never be able to answer is "why?". Take gravity as an example. We
> > got really good models for it, we can predict how it influences
> > even light with
Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Friday, April 03, 2015 5:05:35 AM waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Boricua Siempre wrote:
> >
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > I have reading of quantum computing and I want know what operating
> > > systems are use in quantum computers. And I read quantum computers
> >
> >
on Thursday 02 April 2015 18:33:06，Boricua Siempre wrote：
> From: Boricua Siempre
> To: gentoo-user
> Date: Yesterday 06:33:06
> Hello
>
> I have reading of quantum computing and I want know what operating systems
> are use in quantum computers. And I read quantum computers can use
> particols
On Friday, April 03, 2015 7:30:09 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
> Well, the quantum mechanic would say that the position of the ball was
> indeterminate until it was measured. The probability of it being in
> any particular position is given by some function that agrees with
> experiment very well.
And
On Saturday, April 04, 2015 12:02:02 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday 03 April 2015 17:11:11 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>
> No, it's stronger than that. Einstein showed us how it works. The
> consequence of having a certain concentration of mass /here/ is to distort
> space-time just /so/ in
On Saturday, April 04, 2015 1:57:19 AM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 03/04/2015 23:11, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > That's the problem with science in general. The one thing it may never be
able
> > to answer is "why?". Take gravity as an example. We got really good models
for
> > it, we can predi
On 03/04/2015 23:11, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> That's the problem with science in general. The one thing it may never be
> able
> to answer is "why?". Take gravity as an example. We got really good models
> for
> it, we can predict how it influences even light with great accuracy but what
>
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Fernando Rodriguez
wrote:
>
> There's an explanation for uncertainty that makes common sense. Let's say I
> throw you a ball, you can catch it because you take many measurements of it's
> location and your brain tries to predict it's path. But this only works
> beca
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday 03 April 2015 17:11:11 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> That's the problem with science in general. The one thing it may never be
>> able to answer is "why?".
>
> I think that's the crux of the problem with some current approaches to
On Saturday 04 April 2015 00:02:02 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Its job is to explain show "this is how the world works."
s/show//
--
Rgds
Peter.
On Friday 03 April 2015 17:11:11 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> That's the problem with science in general. The one thing it may never be
> able to answer is "why?".
I think that's the crux of the problem with some current approaches to
physics. Science does not answer the question "why?". That isn
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 12:06:30PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote
> On Friday 03 April 2015 06:58:38 Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> > I'm not convinced that anybody has proven that quantum behavior is truly
> > non-deterministic
>
> But it must be, surely, since it's probabilistic. I don't see how
> the do
On Friday, April 03, 2015 8:03:12 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> > On Friday 03 April 2015 06:58:38 Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not convinced that anybody has proven that quantum behavior is truly
> >> non-deterministic
> >
> > But it must be
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday 03 April 2015 06:58:38 Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>> I'm not convinced that anybody has proven that quantum behavior is truly
>> non-deterministic
>
> But it must be, surely, since it's probabilistic. I don't see how the domain
> of prob
On Friday 03 April 2015 06:58:38 Rich Freeman wrote:
> I'm not convinced that anybody has proven that quantum behavior is truly
> non-deterministic
But it must be, surely, since it's probabilistic. I don't see how the domain
of probabilistic behaviour can overlap the domain of deterministic
beh
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:30 PM, wrote:
> wrote:
>
>> with the movement of particles. It is a phenomenon that results from
>> the quantum entanglement of e.g. two electrons and has to do with the
>> nonlocality of such phenomenons. When you measure the quantum
>> attributes of one of these two e
On Friday, April 03, 2015 5:05:35 AM waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> Boricua Siempre wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > I have reading of quantum computing and I want know what operating
> > systems are use in quantum computers. And I read quantum computers
>
> I don't think that (yet) there exists compute
wrote:
> with the movement of particles. It is a phenomenon that results from
> the quantum entanglement of e.g. two electrons and has to do with the
> nonlocality of such phenomenons. When you measure the quantum
> attributes of one of these two electrons you instantaneous influence
> the quantu
Boricua Siempre wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have reading of quantum computing and I want know what operating
> systems are use in quantum computers. And I read quantum computers
I don't think that (yet) there exists computers that are completely
based on quantum components. Maybe they have a quantum
On Friday 03 April 2015 01:33:45 Ivan Viso Altamirano wrote:
> As far as i know , there isnt any Quantum os out there
Not only no OS, but no hardware either.
I don't see Gentoo having a quantum version any time soon ;-)
--
Rgds
Peter.
On Friday, April 03, 2015 1:25:59 AM Ivan Viso Altamirano wrote:
> Ii think it is about Quantum bonds . In wich 2 particles share the same
> State at any distance .
And about PhDs extracting research funds from politicians :)
--
Fernando Rodriguez
I forgot again .
As far as i know , there isnt any Quantum os out there . Just qcpus
performing a very simple algorythm. Because the particles still cant hold
their state for long enough.
Btw . If the universe where that easy yo destroy ,it would already be
destroyed. Is just an estadistic question . Is just very improbable that we
are the most advanced lifeform in it .
All if this written bi phone
El 03/04/2015 01:25, "Ivan Viso Altamirano"
escribió:
> Ii think it is about Quant
Ii think it is about Quantum bonds . In wich 2 particles share the same
State at any distance .
Hello
I have reading of quantum computing and I want know what operating systems
are use in quantum computers. And I read quantum computers can use
particols moving faster than light but on other book particels faster than
light make analog sonar boom that can destroy universe. Is quantum computer
35 matches
Mail list logo
