Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday, 21 June 2019 04:08:03 BST Dale wrote:
>
>> The reason I have to add --exclude gentoo-sources to --depclean is so that
>> it won't remove kernels I still have installed and may even be using or
>> keeping as a fall back.
> Depclean won't remove your kernels - only
On Friday, 21 June 2019 04:08:03 BST Dale wrote:
> The reason I have to add --exclude gentoo-sources to --depclean is so that
> it won't remove kernels I still have installed and may even be using or
> keeping as a fall back.
Depclean won't remove your kernels - only the sources to build them fro
Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 6/20/19 11:10 AM, Dale wrote:
>> Kai Peter wrote:
The bad thing about this, sometimes I have to use exclude
gentoo-sources
from things such as --depclean. It's annoying but it's the only way I
could come up with to do this.
>>> You can do an 'e
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 19:18:22 +0200, Kai Peter wrote:
> > The bad thing about this, sometimes I have to use exclude
> > gentoo-sources
> > from things such as --depclean. It's annoying but it's the only way I
> > could come up with to do this.
> >
> You can do an 'emerge --noreplace' - one ti
On 6/20/19 11:10 AM, Dale wrote:
Kai Peter wrote:
The bad thing about this, sometimes I have to use exclude gentoo-sources
from things such as --depclean. It's annoying but it's the only way I
could come up with to do this.
You can do an 'emerge --noreplace' - one time.
I read the man pa
Kai Peter wrote:
> On 2019-06-20 20:10, Dale wrote:
>> Kai Peter wrote:
The bad thing about this, sometimes I have to use exclude
gentoo-sources
from things such as --depclean. It's annoying but it's the only way I
could come up with to do this.
>>> You can do an 'em
On 2019-06-20 20:10, Dale wrote:
Kai Peter wrote:
The bad thing about this, sometimes I have to use exclude
gentoo-sources
from things such as --depclean. It's annoying but it's the only way
I
could come up with to do this.
You can do an 'emerge --noreplace' - one time.
I read the ma
Kai Peter wrote:
>>
>> The bad thing about this, sometimes I have to use exclude gentoo-sources
>> from things such as --depclean. It's annoying but it's the only way I
>> could come up with to do this.
>>
> You can do an 'emerge --noreplace' - one time.
>
I read the man page for this option, I
The bad thing about this, sometimes I have to use exclude
gentoo-sources
from things such as --depclean. It's annoying but it's the only way I
could come up with to do this.
You can do an 'emerge --noreplace' - one time.
--
Sent with eQmail-1.10.1 beta - a fork of djb's famous qmail
On 6/20/19 12:47 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 17:16:21 -0700, Daniel Frey wrote:
I was thinking about this for a bit, and thought that maybe adding the
slot to the package in /var/lib/portage/world would work.
Every release has a separate slot, so this would never offer update
On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 17:16:21 -0700, Daniel Frey wrote:
> I was thinking about this for a bit, and thought that maybe adding the
> slot to the package in /var/lib/portage/world would work.
Every release has a separate slot, so this would never offer updates, no
matter how minor. However, you may
On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 22:51:15 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > When I /am/ ready to upgrade to a newer Minor version, I will just
> > update my /etc/portage/package.mask/gentoo-sources file.
> I admit, it seems to be a cleaner way of doing it than what I'm doing.
> I may even give that a try but for me, I
Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 6/19/19 9:51 PM, Dale wrote:
>> It seems you like that way and it works best for your situation and that
>> is what matters.
>
> Yep. I'm happy enough, for now. We'll see if I change my opinion in
> the future.
>
>> Sometimes there are many ways to do things but some just
On 6/19/19 9:51 PM, Dale wrote:
It seems you like that way and it works best for your situation and that
is what matters.
Yep. I'm happy enough, for now. We'll see if I change my opinion in
the future.
Sometimes there are many ways to do things but some just work better
in certain situati
Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 6/19/19 8:51 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Honestly, I'm not sure there is a easy way to do this.
>
> I'm actually happy with what Vadim recommended.
>
> It keeps me within the minor (?) version of the kernel that I want to
> stay within, while still allowing updates to new micro (?)
On 6/19/19 8:51 PM, Dale wrote:
Honestly, I'm not sure there is a easy way to do this.
I'm actually happy with what Vadim recommended.
It keeps me within the minor (?) version of the kernel that I want to
stay within, while still allowing updates to new micro (?) versions.
Is Major, Minor,
Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 6/19/19 11:27 AM, Grant Taylor wrote:
>> On 6/19/19 11:37 AM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
>>> echo '>sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.15' >>
>>> /etc/portage/package.mask/kernels
>>
>> Perfect!
>>
>> Thank you. :-)
>>
>> I did name the file /etc/portage/package.mask/gentoo-
On 6/19/19 11:27 AM, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 6/19/19 11:37 AM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
echo '>sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.15' >>
/etc/portage/package.mask/kernels
Perfect!
Thank you. :-)
I did name the file /etc/portage/package.mask/gentoo-sources as I like
to name the file after t
On 6/19/19 11:37 AM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
echo '>sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.15' >> /etc/portage/package.mask/kernels
Perfect!
Thank you. :-)
I did name the file /etc/portage/package.mask/gentoo-sources as I like
to name the file after the package that it's meant to effect.
Th
echo '>sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.15' >> /etc/portage/package.mask/kernels
Is there a way that I can prevent emerge from wanting to update
(download / install) gentoo-sources for kernel versions beyond a
specified value?
I want to stick within a specific version of the kernel / gentoo-sources
because of dependencies on Open vSwitch.
I'm okay receiving updates to th
21 matches
Mail list logo
