On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:34:42 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Alternatively, you could do the same with the in-kernel ecryptfs.
> > These two solutions work in much the same way, allowing you to mount
> > individual directories with their own passwords, so you could have a
> > single /home with
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 09:53:08PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:15:12 -0600, Albert Hopkins wrote:
>
> > I would probably use encfs, forget about the one-lvm-per-user
> > complexity, and just back up the encrypted filesystem just like any
> > other fs.
>
> Alternatively, y
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 02:15:12PM -0600, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> I would probably use encfs, forget about the one-lvm-per-user
> complexity, and just back up the encrypted filesystem just like any
> other fs.
No, I want each user to have their own volume, manually mouinted with
a passphrase. Fo
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:15:12 -0600, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> I would probably use encfs, forget about the one-lvm-per-user
> complexity, and just back up the encrypted filesystem just like any
> other fs.
Alternatively, you could do the same with the in-kernel ecryptfs. These
two solutions work in
On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 11:52 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I want to set up two portable 1TB drives so users have their own LVM
> partitions to mount as crypto drives. These partitions would have to
> be mounted manually with the passpharse supplied by each user (this is
> a family setup, just
I want to set up two portable 1TB drives so users have their own LVM
partitions to mount as crypto drives. These partitions would have to
be mounted manually with the passpharse supplied by each user (this is
a family setup, just a few users). But I want the system to be able
to backup one 1TB dr
6 matches
Mail list logo
