On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 02:15:12PM -0600, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> I would probably use encfs, forget about the one-lvm-per-user
> complexity, and just back up the encrypted filesystem just like any
> other fs.
No, I want each user to have their own volume, manually mouinted with
a passphrase. For instance, I have crontab entries for myself that I
want to execute even if the encryopted volume is not mounted. I wanta
reboot to work fine without waiting for passphrases.
I have no problem with LVM. I will configure the external drive as
one volume group and create individual logical volumes for each user,
so everyone has control of their own encrypted volume. They can add
something to their .bash files to automount it if they want, it won't
make me no never mind. Heck, they can skip the encryption if they
want. But I want users to have their own logical volumes, and I want
it to be independent of $HOME.
--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
