> Bo Andresen wrote:
>
> >On Thursday 16 February 2006 19:35, gentuxx wrote:
> >
> Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -uav gentoo-sources ?
> I mean, "u" for "update"?
> >>
> >>emerge -uav gentoo-sources
> >>
> >>These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
> >>
> >>Calculating dependenc
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:05:04 -0500, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> # cat /etc/portage/package* | grep gentoo-sources
grep gentoo-sources /etc/portage/package*
is better, it shows which files match.
--
Neil Bothwick
C:\BELFRY is where I keep my .BAT files ^^^oo^^^
signature.asc
Description: PGP si
On Thursday 16 February 2006 16:23, a tiny voice compelled Nick Rout to write:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:26:19 -0800
>
> gentuxx wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > >On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:29:50 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> > >> I was poki
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:24:57 -0800, gentuxx wrote:
> I do need to prune some of the older kernels out of there. But I
> don't want to get rid of all of them but the most recent. Is there a
> way that I can "protect" or "omit" 2.6.13-r3 from the emerge --prune
> process and remove the rest?
cd /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bo Andresen wrote:
>On Thursday 16 February 2006 20:53, gentuxx wrote:
>
>>>Do you have eix installed? If not I suggest you install it.
>>
>>No, I just installed it. So this is the first time running these
>>commands - if that makes any difference.
>
On Thursday 16 February 2006 20:53, gentuxx wrote:
> >Do you have eix installed? If not I suggest you install it.
>
> No, I just installed it. So this is the first time running these
> commands - if that makes any difference.
Well, that's why you had to run update-eix. If you intend to use eix in
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:26:19 -0800
gentuxx wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:29:50 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> >
> >> I was poking around in packages.gentoo.org, and noticed
> >>
> >>>that 2.6.15-r1 is unmasked for
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:53:21 -0800, gentuxx wrote:
> eix -e gentoo-sources
> * sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
> Available versions: 2.4.28-r9 ~2.4.31-r1 2.6.9-r9 2.6.12-r9
> 2.6.12-r10 ~2.6.13 ~2.6.13-r1 ~2.6.13-r2 2.6.13-r3
> Installed: 2.6.11-r5 2.6.11-r6 2.6.11-r8 2.6.11-r9
> 2.
On 2/16/06, gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:29:50 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> >
> >> I was poking around in packages.gentoo.org, and noticed
> >>
> >>>that 2.6.15-r1 is unmasked for x86. So
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:29:50 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
>
>> I was poking around in packages.gentoo.org, and noticed
>>
>>>that 2.6.15-r1 is unmasked for x86. So I run an `emerge --sync`, and
>>>`emerge -av gentoo-sources`. An
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:29:50 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> I was poking around in packages.gentoo.org, and noticed
> > that 2.6.15-r1 is unmasked for x86. So I run an `emerge --sync`, and
> > `emerge -av gentoo-sources`. And it wants to rebuild my 2.6.13-r3
>
> Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bo Andresen wrote:
>On Thursday 16 February 2006 19:35, gentuxx wrote:
>
Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -uav gentoo-sources ?
I mean, "u" for "update"?
>>
>>emerge -uav gentoo-sources
>>
>>These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Holly Bostick wrote:
>gentuxx schreef:
>
>>Daniel da Veiga wrote:
>>
On 2/16/06, gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Forgive me if this ends up being the "stupid question of the
day".
But, I haven't been able to upgrade my ker
gentuxx schreef:
> Daniel da Veiga wrote:
>
>>> On 2/16/06, gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>
>>> Forgive me if this ends up being the "stupid question of the
>>> day".
>>>
>>> But, I haven't been able to upgrade my kernel for some reason.
>>> (Obviously I could download it from kernel.
On 2/16/06, Bo Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 16 February 2006 19:35, gentuxx wrote:
> > > >Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -uav gentoo-sources ?
> > > >I mean, "u" for "update"?
> >
> > emerge -uav gentoo-sources
> >
> > These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
> >
> >
On Thursday 16 February 2006 19:35, gentuxx wrote:
> > >Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -uav gentoo-sources ?
> > >I mean, "u" for "update"?
>
> emerge -uav gentoo-sources
>
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies ...done!
>
> Total size of downloads: 0 kB
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
>On 2/16/06, gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Forgive me if this ends up being the "stupid question of the day".
>
> But, I haven't been able to upgrade my kernel for some reason.
> (Obviously I could download it from ker
On 2/16/06, gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Forgive me if this ends up being the "stupid question of the day".
>
> But, I haven't been able to upgrade my kernel for some reason.
> (Obviously I could download it from kernel.org and go that rou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Forgive me if this ends up being the "stupid question of the day".
But, I haven't been able to upgrade my kernel for some reason.
(Obviously I could download it from kernel.org and go that route, but
I would like to keep as much as possible in portage
19 matches
Mail list logo
