On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 30 Jan 2017 06:10:47 Tom H wrote:
>>
>> AFAIK, since the advent of defaulting to CoreStorage (OS X 10.10? - OS
>> X's equivalent of LVM) and full-disk encryption (OS X 10.10?),
>> bootx64.efi/boot.efi cannot be loaded from disk0s2.
>
> I sus
On Monday 30 Jan 2017 06:10:47 Tom H wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Mick wrote:
> > On Sunday 29 Jan 2017 14:44:45 Tom H wrote:
> >> [1] Apple's EFI firmware can read hfsplus and it boots (IIRC since OS
> >> X 10.10) from a kernel on the Apple_Boot partition (disk0s3).
> >
> > Yes, App
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 29 Jan 2017 14:44:45 Tom H wrote:
>>
>> [1] Apple's EFI firmware can read hfsplus and it boots (IIRC since OS
>> X 10.10) from a kernel on the Apple_Boot partition (disk0s3).
>
> Yes, Apple's firmware reads the blessed hfs+ partition and fis
On Sunday 29 Jan 2017 14:44:45 Tom H wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Mick wrote:
> > rEFInd is definitely a slick and useful boot manager for multibooting.
> > On this occasion I did not install it, but decided to remain
> > minimalist, because I do not want to interfere much with the Ap
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Mick wrote:
>
> rEFInd is definitely a slick and useful boot manager for multibooting.
> On this occasion I did not install it, but decided to remain
> minimalist, because I do not want to interfere much with the AppleMac
> installation.
>
> So, I created /boot/EFI
On Saturday 28 Jan 2017 12:20:12 Tom H wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > On 28/01/17 00:25, Tom H wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Bill Kenworthy
wrote:
> >>> I tried grub2 and dumped it for "rEFit" - ended up a lot easier and
> >>> more robust.
> >>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On 28/01/17 00:25, Tom H wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>>>
>>> I tried grub2 and dumped it for "rEFit" - ended up a lot easier and
>>> more robust.
>>
>> rEFIt or rEFInd?
>
> Sorry, yes it is rEFInd I am u
On Thursday 26 Jan 2017 18:58:07 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 12:03:24 -0500, Alan Grimes wrote:
> > I looked for more information on GRUB form upstream but, on first
> > impression, it's been an abandoned project since 2012...
>
> That's legacy GRUB, not GRUB2.
>
> But if you want
On Saturday 28 Jan 2017 07:49:13 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On 28/01/17 07:27, Mick wrote:
> > On Saturday 28 Jan 2017 06:50:32 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> >> On 28/01/17 00:25, Tom H wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Bill Kenworthy
> >
> > wrote:
> I tried grub2 and dumped it for "rEFi
On 28/01/17 07:27, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 28 Jan 2017 06:50:32 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>> On 28/01/17 00:25, Tom H wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Bill Kenworthy
> wrote:
I tried grub2 and dumped it for "rEFit" - ended up a lot easier and
more robust.
>>>
>>> rEFIt or rEFIn
On Saturday 28 Jan 2017 06:50:32 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On 28/01/17 00:25, Tom H wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Bill Kenworthy
wrote:
> >> I tried grub2 and dumped it for "rEFit" - ended up a lot easier and
> >> more robust.
> >
> > rEFIt or rEFInd?
>
> Sorry, yes it is rEFInd I a
On 28/01/17 00:25, Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>>
>> I tried grub2 and dumped it for "rEFit" - ended up a lot easier and
>> more robust.
>
> rEFIt or rEFInd?
>
Sorry, yes it is rEFInd I am using.
BillK
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>
> I tried grub2 and dumped it for "rEFit" - ended up a lot easier and
> more robust.
rEFIt or rEFInd?
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Alan Grimes wrote:
> I looked for more information on GRUB form upstream but, on first
> impression, it's been an abandoned project since 2012... Apparently
> some users have posted patches to things like the invalid sector size
> problem but the project has bee
Syslinux family has been my go to boot loader
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017, 4:12 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On 27/01/17 01:03, Alan Grimes wrote:
> > I looked for more information on GRUB form upstream but, on first
> > impression, it's been an abandoned project since 2012... Apparently some
> > users h
On 27/01/17 01:03, Alan Grimes wrote:
> I looked for more information on GRUB form upstream but, on first
> impression, it's been an abandoned project since 2012... Apparently some
> users have posted patches to things like the invalid sector size problem
> but the project has been deaf to these pr
On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 12:03:24 -0500, Alan Grimes wrote:
> I looked for more information on GRUB form upstream but, on first
> impression, it's been an abandoned project since 2012...
That's legacy GRUB, not GRUB2.
But if you want an EFI bootloader, it is much simpler to use bootctl if
you use sys
On 26 January 2017 at 18:03, Alan Grimes wrote:
> I looked for more information on GRUB form upstream but, on first
> impression, it's been an abandoned project since 2012... Apparently some
> users have posted patches to things like the invalid sector size problem
> but the project has been deaf
I looked for more information on GRUB form upstream but, on first
impression, it's been an abandoned project since 2012... Apparently some
users have posted patches to things like the invalid sector size problem
but the project has been deaf to these problems and has done nothing
whatsoever. =(
I
19 matches
Mail list logo
