On Sunday 27 June 2010 10:50:55 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday 26 June 2010 18:31:05 James Wall wrote:
> > You could also check out Pappy's Kernel Seeds at
> > http://www.kernel-seeds.org.org/
>
> I will - thanks.
Turned out it was much simpler than kernel config - it was BOINC. Now all
I h
On Saturday 26 June 2010 18:31:05 James Wall wrote:
> You could also check out Pappy's Kernel Seeds at
> http://www.kernel-seeds.org.org/
I will - thanks.
--
Rgds
Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.
On 6/23/2010 4:36 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 03:29:16 Dale wrote:
By all means, use genkernel.
I will, RSN. This nearly new, shiny, quad-core box is as sluggish as
hell, and I want to find out why. So I'll use genkernel to install
everything under the sun and see if I
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 03:29:16 Dale wrote:
> By all means, use genkernel.
I will, RSN. This nearly new, shiny, quad-core box is as sluggish as
hell, and I want to find out why. So I'll use genkernel to install
everything under the sun and see if I can work it out.
--
Rgds
Peter.
Bill Longman wrote:
On 06/21/2010 03:37 PM, Dale wrote:
I'm not saying you can't use it just that it doesn't always work. Thing
is, when someone uses genkernel to make the kernel, when someone asks
'did you include some driver', the usual answer is 'I don't know, I used
genkernel' and then
On 06/21/2010 03:37 PM, Dale wrote:
> I'm not saying you can't use it just that it doesn't always work. Thing
> is, when someone uses genkernel to make the kernel, when someone asks
> 'did you include some driver', the usual answer is 'I don't know, I used
> genkernel' and then nobody knows whethe
Bill Longman wrote:
On 06/21/2010 01:23 PM, Dale wrote:
The only thing that genkernel would add is your initrd. The kernel is
exactly the same, whether you compile it with "make" or through
"genkernel". Do a test and you'll see. (I'm assuming we're both talking
about gentoo-sources, not vani
On 06/21/2010 01:23 PM, Dale wrote:
>> The only thing that genkernel would add is your initrd. The kernel is
>> exactly the same, whether you compile it with "make" or through
>> "genkernel". Do a test and you'll see. (I'm assuming we're both talking
>> about gentoo-sources, not vanilla-sources. Ei
Bill Longman wrote:
On 06/21/2010 12:01 PM, Dale wrote:
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
I don't use genkernel anymore. I just roll my own. That way, I know
what is in there and what is not. Then if something doesn't work, I
know if it is the kernel or something else. W
On 06/21/2010 12:01 PM, Dale wrote:
> Alex Schuster wrote:
>> Dale writes:
>>
>>
>>> I don't use genkernel anymore. I just roll my own. That way, I know
>>> what is in there and what is not. Then if something doesn't work, I
>>> know if it is the kernel or something else. With genkernel, you
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
I don't use genkernel anymore. I just roll my own. That way, I know
what is in there and what is not. Then if something doesn't work, I
know if it is the kernel or something else. With genkernel, you won't
have a clue what it is since you don't know much
Dale writes:
> I don't use genkernel anymore. I just roll my own. That way, I know
> what is in there and what is not. Then if something doesn't work, I
> know if it is the kernel or something else. With genkernel, you won't
> have a clue what it is since you don't know much if anything about t
Bill Longman wrote:
This is funny. I have NEVER got a genkernel to work on my system.
Actually, on any system. I'm not sure the OP would know that kernel is
any better then the one he makes.
Dale,
If you've never gotten genkernel to work, you should try this little
script that I'v
> This is funny. I have NEVER got a genkernel to work on my system.
> Actually, on any system. I'm not sure the OP would know that kernel is
> any better then the one he makes.
Dale,
If you've never gotten genkernel to work, you should try this little
script that I've used for the past few ye
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 14:26 +1000, Jake Moe wrote:
No, I was tempted to try genkernel, but again, OCD got the best of me;
I
like Gentoo because I tell it what I want and need, and it does that
and
nothing else. Genkernel, in my understand, does everything (and
apparent
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 14:26 +1000, Jake Moe wrote:
> No, I was tempted to try genkernel, but again, OCD got the best of me;
> I
> like Gentoo because I tell it what I want and need, and it does that
> and
> nothing else. Genkernel, in my understand, does everything (and
> apparently does it pretty
On 18/06/10 14:05, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 13:54 +1000, Jake Moe wrote:
>
>> I had tried to see if there was anything special about the hardware,
>> but
>> couldn't find anything. I'm still of the opinion that it's something
>> to
>> do with the kernel, but I've given up o
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 13:54 +1000, Jake Moe wrote:
> I had tried to see if there was anything special about the hardware,
> but
> couldn't find anything. I'm still of the opinion that it's something
> to
> do with the kernel, but I've given up on amd64 (I'm not sure if I've
> had
> an amd64 Gentoo
On 17/06/10 20:38, Roger Mason wrote:
> Jake,
>
> Jake Moe writes:
>
>
>> I've just completed a fresh Gentoo installation on a new laptop, and
>> strangely, after I choose the entry from the Grub screen, all I get is:
>>
>> Booting `Gentoo Linux 2.6.32-r7`
>>
>> root (hd0,1)
>> Filesystem ty
Jake,
Jake Moe writes:
> I've just completed a fresh Gentoo installation on a new laptop, and
> strangely, after I choose the entry from the Grub screen, all I get is:
>
> Booting `Gentoo Linux 2.6.32-r7`
>
> root (hd0,1)
> Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
> kernel /kernel-2.6.3
I've just completed a fresh Gentoo installation on a new laptop, and
strangely, after I choose the entry from the Grub screen, all I get is:
Booting `Gentoo Linux 2.6.32-r7`
root (hd0,1)
Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
kernel /kernel-2.6.32-gentoo-r7 root=/dev/sda4
[Linux-bzI
21 matches
Mail list logo
