On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 14:26 +1000, Jake Moe wrote: > No, I was tempted to try genkernel, but again, OCD got the best of me; > I > like Gentoo because I tell it what I want and need, and it does that > and > nothing else. Genkernel, in my understand, does everything (and > apparently does it pretty well), but it means that it's bigger than it > needs to be. Plus, I hadn't gotten a reply back in a while, and I'm > limited on time with this laptop, so I went back to that which I know > better. > > And I thought the Live CD used genkernel; I thought that was where > genkernel came from in the first place? Is it different?
I have no idea; I don't use genkernel. All I'm saying is if you can try booting on a kernel you know at least *should* work (such as the live cd or genkernel) and that works then at least you can deduce it down to kernel config. -a
