Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is starting net.eth1 [not in rc-update]

2008-12-29 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:39:57 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: > Well that kind of sucks. I don't use eth1 often but I do want it in > /etc/init.d. > > I'm wondering how wise it is to have tools other than re-update and > /etc/conf.d dinking around with basic services. It seems like starting > an unwa

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is starting net.eth1 [not in rc-update]

2008-12-29 Thread Dale
Ian Lee wrote: > Dale wrote: >> Harry Putnam wrote: >>> Ian Lee writes: >>> >>> Ian Lee wrote: > Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:04:23 -0600, Dale wrote: >> >> Probably hotplug, add !net.eth0 to rc_hotplug in /etc/rc.conf

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is starting net.eth1 [not in rc-update]

2008-12-29 Thread Ian Lee
Dale wrote: Harry Putnam wrote: Ian Lee writes: Ian Lee wrote: Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:04:23 -0600, Dale wrote: Probably hotplug, add !net.eth0 to rc_hotplug in /etc/rc.conf That's in /etc/conf.d/rc on mine. Has it moved?

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is starting net.eth1 [not in rc-update]

2008-12-29 Thread Willie Wong
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:36:08AM -0600, Penguin Lover Harry Putnam squawked: > > try putting rc_coldplug="no" in conf.d/udev or /etc/rc.conf i would > > assume the udev init script checks both places > > I can tell you from trying that just now... that is not a good > solution. > > First setti

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is starting net.eth1 [not in rc-update]

2008-12-29 Thread Dale
Harry Putnam wrote: > Ian Lee writes: > > >> Ian Lee wrote: >> >>> Neil Bothwick wrote: >>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:04:23 -0600, Dale wrote: >> Probably hotplug, add !net.eth0 to rc_hotplug in /etc/rc.conf >> > That's in

[gentoo-user] Re: What is starting net.eth1 [not in rc-update]

2008-12-29 Thread Harry Putnam
Ian Lee writes: >> They are all present in /etc/runlevels. >> >> And again I see no reference to net.eth1 or hwclock >> >> > > that udev rule starts any found network devices on your system net.sh > is just a wrapper to the net.* scripts in init.d, if you never use > eth1 then remove net.eth1 fr

[gentoo-user] Re: What is starting net.eth1 [not in rc-update]

2008-12-29 Thread Harry Putnam
Ian Lee writes: > Ian Lee wrote: >> Neil Bothwick wrote: >>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:04:23 -0600, Dale wrote: >>> > Probably hotplug, add !net.eth0 to rc_hotplug in /etc/rc.conf >>> >>> That's in /etc/conf.d/rc on mine. Has it moved? >>> >>> It moved in the switch from baselayout1 to bas

[gentoo-user] Re: What is starting net.eth1 [not in rc-update]

2008-12-29 Thread Harry Putnam
Dirk Heinrichs writes: > Am Sonntag, 28. Dezember 2008 12:38:37 schrieb Harry Putnam: >> Still, on a shutdown I can't get past this output: >>   >>  hwclock waiting for localmount > > I mentioned it in your other thread. Try masking openrc >=0.4.0. I've masked >=sys-apps/openrc-0.4.0 and do

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is starting net.eth1 [not in rc-update]

2008-12-28 Thread Ian Lee
Harry Putnam wrote: Ian Lee writes: 1) net.eth1 problem There is a udev hook for starting net.* init scripts, /lib/udev/rules.d/90-network.rules to be precise The script is very brief There is no mention of net.eth1 in that script SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add",RUN+="net.sh %k sta

[gentoo-user] Re: What is starting net.eth1 [not in rc-update]

2008-12-28 Thread Harry Putnam
Ian Lee writes: > 1) net.eth1 problem > > There is a udev hook for starting net.* init scripts, > /lib/udev/rules.d/90-network.rules to be precise The script is very brief There is no mention of net.eth1 in that script SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add",RUN+="net.sh %k start" SUBSYSTEM=="

[gentoo-user] Re: What is starting net.eth1 [not in rc-update]

2008-12-28 Thread Harry Putnam
Dirk Heinrichs writes: > Am Sonntag, 28. Dezember 2008 12:38:37 schrieb Harry Putnam: >> Still, on a shutdown I can't get past this output: >>   >>  hwclock waiting for localmount > > I mentioned it in your other thread. Try masking openrc >=0.4.0. Yeah, just got around to reading that with this