On 27 May 2009, at 10:11, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
...
Nah, that just doesn't cut it. It's annoying as hell. It's far less
annoying to simply "equery uses" on the USE flags you see during an
"emerge -a" and edit make.conf by hand instead of doing the
scroll-circus. You try to read text by
On 27 May 2009, at 09:15, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
...
This is why I have arrived at the combination of euse (and now
`equery
uses`) to view USE descriptions and flagedit for setting them. I
think
that from a usability point of view these are easier than either ufed
or a text editor.
e
On Wed, 27 May 2009 11:30:11 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Nah, that just doesn't cut it. It's annoying as hell. It's far less
> annoying to simply "equery uses" on the USE flags you see during an
> "emerge -a" and edit make.conf by hand
It's even easier to use flagedit than hand editing.
On Mittwoch 27 Mai 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Mittwoch 27 Mai 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> >>> Protip: arrow keys, left, right.
> >>
> >> Nah, that just doesn't cut it. It's annoying as hell. It's far less
> >> annoying
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Mittwoch 27 Mai 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Protip: arrow keys, left, right.
Nah, that just doesn't cut it. It's annoying as hell. It's far less
annoying to simply "equery uses" on the USE flags you see during an
"emerge -a" and e
On Mittwoch 27 Mai 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Mittwoch 27 Mai 2009, Stroller wrote:
> >> On 27 May 2009, at 00:33, Keith Dart wrote:
> > ...
> > USE_FOO="this n that"
> > USE_BAR="some more flags"
> > BLAH="whatever else there might be"
> >>>
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Mittwoch 27 Mai 2009, Stroller wrote:
On 27 May 2009, at 00:33, Keith Dart wrote:
...
USE_FOO="this n that"
USE_BAR="some more flags"
BLAH="whatever else there might be"
USE="${USE_FOO} ${USE_BAR} ${BLAH}
Thank's. That is exactly what I was looking for.
But tha
On Mittwoch 27 Mai 2009, Stroller wrote:
> On 27 May 2009, at 00:33, Keith Dart wrote:
> >>> ...
> >>> USE_FOO="this n that"
> >>> USE_BAR="some more flags"
> >>> BLAH="whatever else there might be"
> >>>
> >>> USE="${USE_FOO} ${USE_BAR} ${BLAH}
> >>
> >> Thank's. That is exactly what I was looking
On 27 May 2009, at 00:33, Keith Dart wrote:
...
USE_FOO="this n that"
USE_BAR="some more flags"
BLAH="whatever else there might be"
USE="${USE_FOO} ${USE_BAR} ${BLAH}
Thank's. That is exactly what I was looking for.
But that will likely break, or render useless, the ufed tool.
If you don't
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 04:23:13 Keith Dart wrote:
> On May 26, 2009, at 6:41 PM, Dale wrote:
> > Memorized all of what? Open a text editor and edit make.conf. What
> > do
> > you need to memorize? If you use KDE, you can edit them with kwrite
> > which is about as easy as it gets. Heck, I bee
On May 26, 2009, at 6:41 PM, Dale wrote:
Memorized all of what? Open a text editor and edit make.conf. What
do
you need to memorize? If you use KDE, you can edit them with kwrite
which is about as easy as it gets. Heck, I been using Gentoo for
years
and I don't recall ever using ufed.
Keith Dart wrote:
> On May 26, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
>> Changing USE flags is easy enough already, isn't it? I don't think I
>> want
>> any program meddling in my make.conf, thanks.
>
> No, I have not yet memorized all of them, and they change frequently.
> But suit yourself, I
On May 26, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Changing USE flags is easy enough already, isn't it? I don't think I
want
any program meddling in my make.conf, thanks.
No, I have not yet memorized all of them, and they change frequently.
But suit yourself, I like ufed.
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 May 2009 01:02:17 Keith Dart wrote:
>
>> On May 26, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday 27 May 2009 00:33:12 Keith Dart wrote:
>>>
But that will likely break, or render useless, the ufed tool.
If you don't
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 01:02:17 Keith Dart wrote:
> On May 26, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 May 2009 00:33:12 Keith Dart wrote:
> >> But that will likely break, or render useless, the ufed tool.
> >>
> >> If you don't use that, you probably should.
> >
> > Why?
>
>
On May 26, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 00:33:12 Keith Dart wrote:
But that will likely break, or render useless, the ufed tool.
If you don't use that, you probably should.
Why?
Makes it easy to change USE flags. You see the flag name, current
settin
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 00:33:12 Keith Dart wrote:
> But that will likely break, or render useless, the ufed tool.
>
> If you don't use that, you probably should.
Why?
--
Rgds
Peter
On May 26, 2009, at 4:07 PM, KH wrote:
You can do whatever you wish as long as USE contains all you need
in the
end. Example:
USE_FOO="this n that"
USE_BAR="some more flags"
BLAH="whatever else there might be"
USE="${USE_FOO} ${USE_BAR} ${BLAH}"
Thank's. That is exactly what I was lo
Nikos Chantziaras schrieb:
> KH wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> so inspired by [gentoo-user] USE="mmx mmxext sse sse2 ssse3 3dnow
>> 3dnowext" I again thougt about my USE flags.
>>
>> Now I want to put them in an order which is better fitting my need than
>> the alphabetical order. I remember I saw something o
KH wrote:
Hi,
so inspired by [gentoo-user] USE="mmx mmxext sse sse2 ssse3 3dnow
3dnowext" I again thougt about my USE flags.
Now I want to put them in an order which is better fitting my need than
the alphabetical order. I remember I saw something ordering it for
hardware and software, but I ca
20 matches
Mail list logo
