On Oct 14, 2013 6:04 PM, "Tanstaafl" wrote:
>
> On 2013-10-13 5:49 PM, Dale wrote:
>>
>> Talk about putting some stuff on tmpfs. O_O I have always wanted to
>> copy the tree to tmpfs and run "time emerge -uvaDN world". Just to see
>> how fast it will go. lol
>
>
> I remember once I worked for
Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 13 Oct 2013 22:49:41 Dale wrote:
>> I don't overclock so I'm not worried about that. I did it once with a
>> old Abit mobo with a AMD 2500+ CPU but it just didn't make much
difference.
>
> O/C = higher costs. You need higher frequency memory, bigger CPU/case
coolers
> and
On Sunday 13 Oct 2013 22:49:41 Dale wrote:
> I don't overclock so I'm not worried about that. I did it once with a
> old Abit mobo with a AMD 2500+ CPU but it just didn't make much difference.
O/C = higher costs. You need higher frequency memory, bigger CPU/case coolers
and potentially a bigger
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-10-13 5:49 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Talk about putting some stuff on tmpfs. O_O I have always wanted to
>> copy the tree to tmpfs and run "time emerge -uvaDN world". Just to see
>> how fast it will go. lol
>
> I remember once I worked for an Apple reseller that had this
>
On 2013-10-13 5:49 PM, Dale wrote:
Talk about putting some stuff on tmpfs. O_O I have always wanted to
copy the tree to tmpfs and run "time emerge -uvaDN world". Just to see
how fast it will go. lol
I remember once I worked for an Apple reseller that had this accounting
program that requi
Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 13 Oct 2013 13:26:31 Dale wrote:
>>
>> Memory question. The mobo I have uses this: "Support for DDR3
>> 1666(OC)/1333/1066 MHz memory modules" I have the 1666 on here. It was
>> what was on sale. :-D The new mobo calls for this: "DDR3
>> 2000(OC)/1866/1600/1333/1066"
On Sunday 13 Oct 2013 13:26:31 Dale wrote:
> Dale wrote:
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> Basically, it looks like you have a once-off event.
> >>
> >> Until it happens again, very little you can do wrt troubleshooting
> >
> > I agree. It ran for days with no problems that I saw. Sure is weird
> >
Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>> Basically, it looks like you have a once-off event.
>>
>> Until it happens again, very little you can do wrt troubleshooting
>>
>>
>>
> I agree. It ran for days with no problems that I saw. Sure is weird
> tho. I just wonder if something outside the puter
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:28:01 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> The original config had OHCI enabled. My mobo doesn't need UHCI. I
>> didn't have EHCI enabled but likely don't need it anyway. I don't think
>> anything I have is USB3 based on what folks are posting here.
> EHCI is US
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:11:26 -0500, Dale wrote:
> I looked at those. They have no color at all. It's just metal on
> mine. I've had them for a while so I suspect they are USB2. Just a
> thought tho. They could be USB1 for all I know.
They are USB2. If they're not blue, they're not USB3 and
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:28:01 -0500, Dale wrote:
> The original config had OHCI enabled. My mobo doesn't need UHCI. I
> didn't have EHCI enabled but likely don't need it anyway. I don't think
> anything I have is USB3 based on what folks are posting here.
EHCI is USB2, if you disable that and
Update. I figure what the heck. Time to crawl under the desk for a
while. I stop the UPS services and then unplug the USB cable to the
UPS. The error stops. I plug the cable back up with the services NOT
started, no error but it spits out the messages that it sees the UPS and
such. I start t
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 06/10/2013 21:24, Dale wrote:
>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> On 06/10/2013 20:36, Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> These days all you need is ehci for usb2 and xhci for usb3 (unless you
> are using ancient hardware with physical usb1 ports)
Well, I rebuil
Bruce Hill wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 01:36:50PM -0500, Dale wrote:
>> Well, I rebuilt the kernel and removed the OHCI and UHCI. When I
>> rebooted, it couldn't see my UPS and nut couldn't start its services.
>> So, it appears that mine must be "ancient" hardware. My messages file
>> is st
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 03:31:43PM -0500, Dale wrote:
>> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>> On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 14:24:25 -0500, Dale wrote:
>>>
That's what I meant tho. I have USB3 ports but it seems they have been
running at USB2 speeds since I never enabled USB3 drive
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 23:07:20 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Your USB sticks are not USB3. I have yet to see one anywhere that is.
I can send you a photo of mine :)
> I don;t thing they are even remotely fast enough to warrant it
It is noticeably, but not massively, faster.
--
Neil Bothwick
T
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 01:36:50PM -0500, Dale wrote:
>
> Well, I rebuilt the kernel and removed the OHCI and UHCI. When I
> rebooted, it couldn't see my UPS and nut couldn't start its services.
> So, it appears that mine must be "ancient" hardware. My messages file
> is still full of the same
On 06/10/2013 21:24, Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 06/10/2013 20:36, Dale wrote:
>>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
These days all you need is ehci for usb2 and xhci for usb3 (unless you
are using ancient hardware with physical usb1 ports)
>>> Well, I rebuilt the kernel and removed the
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 03:31:43PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 14:24:25 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >
> >> That's what I meant tho. I have USB3 ports but it seems they have been
> >> running at USB2 speeds since I never enabled USB3 drivers. I sort of
> >> missed th
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 14:24:25 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> That's what I meant tho. I have USB3 ports but it seems they have been
>> running at USB2 speeds since I never enabled USB3 drivers. I sort of
>> missed that. No clue if the stuff I am plugging in supports USB3 or not
>>
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 14:24:25 -0500, Dale wrote:
> That's what I meant tho. I have USB3 ports but it seems they have been
> running at USB2 speeds since I never enabled USB3 drivers. I sort of
> missed that. No clue if the stuff I am plugging in supports USB3 or not
> tho. Maybe my USB sticks d
More info to cloud up things even more. I tried different versions of
kernel and each one of them produced the same error. I went all the way
back to 3.5.3 and up to 3.11.1. I might add, I ran that 3.5.3 kernel
for months with no problems that I know of, including this one. My
longest uptime w
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 06/10/2013 20:36, Dale wrote:
>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> These days all you need is ehci for usb2 and xhci for usb3 (unless you
>>> are using ancient hardware with physical usb1 ports)
>> Well, I rebuilt the kernel and removed the OHCI and UHCI. When I
>> rebooted, it c
On 06/10/2013 20:36, Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> These days all you need is ehci for usb2 and xhci for usb3 (unless you
>> are using ancient hardware with physical usb1 ports)
>
> Well, I rebuilt the kernel and removed the OHCI and UHCI. When I
> rebooted, it couldn't see my UPS and nu
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 05/10/2013 12:13, Dale wrote:
>>> Dale changed his motherboard recently, presumably he knows what his
chipset offers
>> This is the rig I built a few years ago. It has a Gigabyte mobo but it
>> hasn't been changed yet. I was planning on it but family issues mov
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> These days all you need is ehci for usb2 and xhci for usb3 (unless you
> are using ancient hardware with physical usb1 ports)
Well, I rebuilt the kernel and removed the OHCI and UHCI. When I
rebooted, it couldn't see my UPS and nut couldn't start its services.
So, it appe
On 05/10/2013 12:13, Dale wrote:
>> Dale changed his motherboard recently, presumably he knows what his
>> > chipset offers
>> >
> This is the rig I built a few years ago. It has a Gigabyte mobo but it
> hasn't been changed yet. I was planning on it but family issues moved
> that from a burner to
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 05:06:57AM -0500, Dale wrote:
> >
> > Just remove ohci and uhci from the kernel config
> >
> >
> > These days all you need is ehci for usb2 and xhci for usb3 (unless you
> > are using ancient hardware with physical usb1 ports)
> >
>
> Well, I'm not sure about my UPS. It co
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 23:52, Walter Dnes wrote:
>>
>> Do *NOT* remove lowspeed USB driver... unless you have a rescue USB
>> stick boot handy. I tried that a few years ago and found that my USB
>> keyboard and mouse stopped working. UHCI is used by Intel and VIA cpus,
>> accordin
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 22:19, Dale wrote:
>> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> On 04/10/2013 18:09, Dale wrote:
Sometime last night while I was sleeping, my network sort of hiccuped.
If I went to a Konsole, I could ping google so it appears the network
was working on the lower
On 04/10/2013 23:52, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 09:35:33PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
>
>> OHCI is a USB 1.1 implementation, I can't imagine why you have it
>> loaded. Surely you do not have USB 1 only hardware? USB2 deals with that
>> nicely. It is possible that you have a shit
On 04/10/2013 22:19, Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 04/10/2013 18:09, Dale wrote:
>>> Sometime last night while I was sleeping, my network sort of hiccuped.
>>> If I went to a Konsole, I could ping google so it appears the network
>>> was working on the lower level but not one browser th
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 09:35:33PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
> OHCI is a USB 1.1 implementation, I can't imagine why you have it
> loaded. Surely you do not have USB 1 only hardware? USB2 deals with that
> nicely. It is possible that you have a shit storm of USB weirdness going
> on and this in l
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 18:09, Dale wrote:
>> Sometime last night while I was sleeping, my network sort of hiccuped.
>> If I went to a Konsole, I could ping google so it appears the network
>> was working on the lower level but not one browser that was left open
>> would work. It als
On 04/10/2013 18:09, Dale wrote:
> Sometime last night while I was sleeping, my network sort of hiccuped.
> If I went to a Konsole, I could ping google so it appears the network
> was working on the lower level but not one browser that was left open
> would work. It also didn't/couldn't download
Sometime last night while I was sleeping, my network sort of hiccuped.
If I went to a Konsole, I could ping google so it appears the network
was working on the lower level but not one browser that was left open
would work. It also didn't/couldn't download new emails. When I
restarted the browser
36 matches
Mail list logo
