Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} DNS: no SOA record or DNSSEC

2013-09-01 Thread Grant
>> Does this look OK? >> >> $ dig soa MASKED.com +short @MASKED1.MASKED.com >> MASKED1.MASKED.com. MASKED.MASKED.com. MMDD00 3600 1801 604800 3601 > > That looks OK, doubly so if all listed NS servers return the same answer They do indeed. > In all likelihood I'd say you are dealing with a DN

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} DNS: no SOA record or DNSSEC

2013-09-01 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 01/09/2013 10:24, Grant wrote: >> Instead just use dig, using google.com as an example get the NS records >> > first: >> > >> > $ dig ns google.com +short >> > ns3.google.com. >> > ns2.google.com. >> > ns1.google.com. >> > ns4.google.com. >> > >> > Then query each of those name server in turn di

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} DNS: no SOA record or DNSSEC

2013-09-01 Thread Grant
>> I use a fairly well-known (free) DNS provider. I just checked my DNS >> settings at dnscheck.pingdom.com and I got: >> >> 1. No SOA record was found when querying the name server. This is most >> probably due to a misconfiguration at the name server - a zone must >> have a SOA record. >> >> 2.

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} DNS: no SOA record or DNSSEC

2013-08-27 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 08/27/2013 10:36 AM, William Kenworthy wrote: > I used to use "dlint" for this, but the package no longer builds easily > - is there any equivalent package as dig is not ideal to find what the > problem actually is? > The 'donuts' tool from net-dns/dnssec-tools can supposedly do this, if you c

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} DNS: no SOA record or DNSSEC

2013-08-27 Thread William Kenworthy
I used to use "dlint" for this, but the package no longer builds easily - is there any equivalent package as dig is not ideal to find what the problem actually is? BillK On 27/08/13 19:53, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 27/08/2013 12:30, Grant wrote: >> I use a fairly well-known (free) DNS provider.

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} DNS: no SOA record or DNSSEC

2013-08-27 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 27/08/2013 12:30, Grant wrote: > I use a fairly well-known (free) DNS provider. I just checked my DNS > settings at dnscheck.pingdom.com and I got: > > 1. No SOA record was found when querying the name server. This is most > probably due to a misconfiguration at the name server - a zone must >

[gentoo-user] {OT} DNS: no SOA record or DNSSEC

2013-08-27 Thread Grant
I use a fairly well-known (free) DNS provider. I just checked my DNS settings at dnscheck.pingdom.com and I got: 1. No SOA record was found when querying the name server. This is most probably due to a misconfiguration at the name server - a zone must have a SOA record. 2. Nameserver * does not