On 01/09/2013 10:24, Grant wrote:
>> Instead just use dig, using google.com as an example get the NS records
>> > first:
>> >
>> > $ dig ns google.com +short
>> > ns3.google.com.
>> > ns2.google.com.
>> > ns1.google.com.
>> > ns4.google.com.
>> >
>> > Then query each of those name server in turn directly for the SOA:
>> >
>> > $ dig soa google.com +short @ns3.google.com
>> > ns1.google.com. dns-admin.google.com. 2013081400 7200 1800 1209600 300
>> >
>> > That's a correct SOA record.
> Does this look OK?
> 
> $ dig soa MASKED.com +short @MASKED1.MASKED.com
> MASKED1.MASKED.com. MASKED.MASKED.com. YYYYMMDD00 3600 1801 604800 3601


That looks OK, doubly so if all listed NS servers return the same answer

In all likelihood I'd say you are dealing with a DNS-check web site that
is over-enthusiastic, or can't deal with network errors or just plain buggy.

IOW, odds are very good that there is nothing wrong with your domain at
all :-)



-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com


Reply via email to