Re: [gentoo-user] SCIM - terminal spreadsheet - sc fork

2015-02-21 Thread Sam Bishop
... Please fix your missing donate link in the github read me... I went to github to try and donate regardless of how little you needed it, because I have wasted literally days of time looking for a modern even semi maintained command line spreadsheet tool, saw you asking for donations, and notic

Re: [gentoo-user] Open Question: The feasibility of a complete portage binhost

2015-01-22 Thread Sam Bishop
On 22 January 2015 at 17:00, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:43:32 +0800, Sam Bishop wrote: > >> I'll quote from the binpkg docs: >> >> Next to these, portage will check if the binary package is built >> >> using the same USE flags a

Re: [gentoo-user] Open Question: The feasibility of a complete portage binhost

2015-01-22 Thread Sam Bishop
On 21 January 2015 at 23:53, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > I actually had kind of a cool idea while walking to the bus stop this > morning; a JIT Portage server that builds packages on demand. This would > require: > > * Writing a portage server > * Patching portage to connect to said server > Or...

Re: [gentoo-user] Open Question: The feasibility of a complete portage binhost

2015-01-22 Thread Sam Bishop
On 22 January 2015 at 01:54, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Mittwoch 21 Januar 2015, 20:36:55 schrieb Sam Bishop: >> So I've been thinking crazy thoughts. >> >> Theoretically it can't be that hard to do a complete package binhost for >> gentoo. >> >&g

Re: [gentoo-user] Open Question: The feasibility of a complete portage binhost

2015-01-22 Thread Sam Bishop
On 21 January 2015 at 22:44, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Sam Bishop wrote: >> >> I don't see why it can't be all the combinations, the issue is >> storage, and the storage costs could be a lot lower than expected >> given how har

Re: [gentoo-user] Open Question: The feasibility of a complete portage binhost

2015-01-21 Thread Sam Bishop
On 21 January 2015 at 21:23, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > > On 01/21/2015 07:47 AM, Sam Bishop wrote: >> So I've been thinking crazy thoughts. >> >> Theoretically it can't be that hard to do a complete package binhost for >> gentoo. > > I love that you

[gentoo-user] Open Question: The feasibility of a complete portage binhost

2015-01-21 Thread Sam Bishop
So I've been thinking crazy thoughts. Theoretically it can't be that hard to do a complete package binhost for gentoo. To be clear, when i say complete, Im referring to building, all versions of all ebuilds marked stable or unstable on amd64, with every combination of use flags. This pretty much

[gentoo-user] Open Question: The feasibility of a complete portage binhost

2015-01-21 Thread Sam Bishop
So I've been thinking crazy thoughts. Theoretically it can't be that hard to do a complete package binhost for gentoo. To be clear, when i say complete, Im referring to building, all versions of all ebuilds marked stable or unstable on amd64, with every combination of use flags. This pretty much

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CI Continuous Integration

2014-12-17 Thread Sam Bishop
sum it up by saying that I don't see any reason Gentoo must be hard. On 17 December 2014 at 23:37, James wrote: > Sam Bishop cygnus.email> writes: > > >> Very interesting. A great example of how something can be both Gentoo >> and Not Gentoo. This is 100% Gentoo u

Re: [gentoo-user] CI Continuous Integration

2014-12-16 Thread Sam Bishop
Very interesting. A great example of how something can be both Gentoo and Not Gentoo. This is 100% Gentoo unlike Funtoo or Sabayon, but it brings in some of their advantages. Gentoo doesn't prevent us from having multiple package variants and this leads to cool stuff like being able to have a set o

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: automated code validation

2014-12-08 Thread Sam Bishop
On 8 December 2014 at 08:54, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:42 PM, James wrote: >> Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes: >>> > liveUSB, where folks can download "Gentoo Fever" onto a usb stick and >>> > stick >>> > into their current hardware and boot up a killer code development sys

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: automated code validation

2014-12-07 Thread Sam Bishop
In order to catch up a bit since I wasn't subscribed to the mailing list with this email at the time I found this thread. If anything sounds odd, read through to the end. I'm trying to top reply so I'm leaving my 'backstory' till the end. > Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes: > > > James tampabay.r