I just checked for ekiga in the tree, and I was just about to request it be
added when I noticed a few bugs indicating it used to be in the tree,
implying it was since removed.
A log check within /usr/portage/net-voip/ekiga reveals that it was
apparently removed pre-git
I just noticed that the nss use flag is a local use flag provided by
11 separate packages.
This is over the 5 for moving to global except that I also noticed the
use flags are different.
Would a cleanup on this part help any?
r 2017 10:07:11 GMT Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Hi Raymond,
>>
>> Am Sat, 23 Dec 2017 22:59:32 -0800 schrieb Raymond Jennings:
>> > That sounds like a possible issue with your X configuration.
>> >
>> > Did you double check /etc/conf.d/xdm and the like to ma
That sounds like a possible issue with your X configuration.
Did you double check /etc/conf.d/xdm and the like to make sure that
your VT is indeed set to 7.
Also double check your display manager configuration.
If your manual VT switch works fine I'd suspect a misbehaving display
manager possibl
Oct 7, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday, 7 October 2017 17:32:21 BST Raymond Jennings wrote:
>> Due to the removal of qt4, all of its reverse dependencies are also going
>> to be removed.
>>
>> This decision has already been made by the qt project
Due to the removal of qt4, all of its reverse dependencies are also going
to be removed.
This decision has already been made by the qt project and is not up for
discussion.
Furthermore, qt4 has a large number of security bugs and it has also been
brought to my attention that it even fails to buil
I noticed something strange.
When I downgraded VLC to use qt4 after a bug...the icon turned from the
familiar orange traffic cone ot an ugly B&W version.
That's when I realized the same thing had happned to classic skype.
Did someone apply code to deliberately grayscale the icons of qt4 apps?
N
I appreciate that you're having a problem but please report all problems
with gentoo packages on the bugzilla:
http://bugs.gentoo.org
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:56 AM, Mario Fetka wrote:
> a compatibility link i added in my ebauld has been removed from the actual
> ebuild.
>
> just try to use a
Just of note, the classic version seems to support cloud based chats now.
There's been some conversions going on on the skype servers, and I reported
a couple of bugs to microsoft which appear to have been recently fixed.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Raymond Jennings
wrote:
> My
2016 02:12 PM, Raymond Jennings wrote:
> > Please be advised that skype has been split off into two packages
> >
> > * skype remains for the "classic" version of skype
> > * skypeforlinux is the new package name for microsoft's alpha version
> >
> >
2016 11:39:44 PM Raymond Jennings wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:51 PM, J. Roeleveld
> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, October 04, 2016 02:12:12 PM Raymond Jennings wrote:
> > > > Please be advised that skype has been split off into two packages
> > > >
&g
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:51 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 04, 2016 02:12:12 PM Raymond Jennings wrote:
> > Please be advised that skype has been split off into two packages
> >
> > * skype remains for the "classic" version of skype
> > * skyp
Please be advised that skype has been split off into two packages
* skype remains for the "classic" version of skype
* skypeforlinux is the new package name for microsoft's alpha version
There were some version number snarls and it was decided that a split would
be cleaner.
Blame microsoft for g
rum based or both? What would be the
> incentive for mentor-wannabes? Etc.
>
> Best regards,
> Andy Mender
>
> On 27 Sep 2016 17:22, "Raymond Jennings" wrote:
>
>> I'm just wondering, is there a project meant to act as a team of mentors,
>> ready to
I'm just wondering, is there a project meant to act as a team of mentors,
ready to take on new recruits?
Points:
* I haven't noticed an official grouping of any sort that organizes
potential mentors into a cohesive group
* I noticed the #gentoo-mentors channel. It appears to be registered, and
Also it appears that #gentoo-infra is invite only.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:16 AM, Raymond Jennings
wrote:
> Probably should clarify that I wasn't talking about patches. I just
> remember the big git migration and was wondering if the syncing process
> itself would
at 12:36 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 09/19/2016 10:54 AM, Raymond Jennings wrote:
> > Just curious, but how are gentoo's infra assets organized?
> >
> > Do you guys use VMs on top of hardware machines and whatnot?
> >
> > Reasons for asking:
> &
Just curious, but how are gentoo's infra assets organized?
Do you guys use VMs on top of hardware machines and whatnot?
Reasons for asking:
* general curiosity
* wondering how a migration to use anongit.gentoo.org instead of github
would go, particularly if it would help ease pressure on the rsy
That channel is also on the good list, but I'm more talking about using
#gentoo-mentors as a specific spot where mentors can hangout and new devs
in training can find them.
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Hans de Graaff wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Sep 2016 21:41:51 -0700, Jigme Datse Yli-RAsku wrote:
>
I think #gentoo-mentors should be filled by people willing to serve as
mentors, and cater to devs in training who need a mentor ^^
What do you guys think?
Also of note is that the bopm confug uses blacklists other than njabl which
are still active.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Thursday, August 25, 2016 07:29:35 PM Raymond Jennings wrote:
> > I still use bopm, and it built fine last time I emerged it.
> >
> > If hopm isn't in the tree yet, why was bopm still pmasked for removal?
> &
I still use bopm, and it built fine last time I emerged it.
If hopm isn't in the tree yet, why was bopm still pmasked for removal?
Reason for asking is I'm curious about removal procedures. I was under the
impression that replacement packages get added to the tree before their
obsolete predecess
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Raymond Jennings
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >>
> >> And since it uses udev it is fairly robust against things like adding
> >>
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> And since it uses udev it is fairly robust against things like adding
> a drive and now the kernel re-letters everything.
>
Did you seriously just post that on a gentoo list?
I assume you mean /dev/sd? and not A: B: C:
:P
Hey, just curious about something:
How is genkernel's "default" kernel config maintained? Is it fixed, or is
it maintained as a diff against upstream, or what?
I'm curious because I'm considering if I should just go straight to the
kernel's own built in defaults.
I know a lot of it sets up most
A good place to start is to make a hotlist of anything that isn't owned by
a package.
You really shouldn't randomly delete things that portage thinks belongs to
someone.
But if you find orphaned junk, it could be fair game. If you have
something bulky that DOES belong to a package, consider usin
Who is supposed to own /usr/portage?
Is there a reason why icedtea-web won't accept icedtea-bin?
I thought that icedtea-bin and icedtea were interchangeable.
Do guinea pigs work better or worse than tribbles at calming you?
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann <
volkerar...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Am 03.04.2013 02:35, schrieb walt:
> > On 03/31/2013 06:00 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> >> Am 01.04.2013 01:12, schrieb walt:
> >>> A
as for the i486 only thing, my guess is because the kernel dropped support
for 386 when 3.8 came out
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 12:17 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >
> > Oh, and "gentoo is fast" is a nono swear word these days. That's ricing
> > :-) Nowadays
31 matches
Mail list logo
