Last riting for classic skype has officially been commenced.

Anyone who wants to install it should either grab the ebuilds now, or
be prepared to go fishing through the git-based repo's history.

I personally plan to keep it installed until microsoft itself blocks
it from login.

On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, 7 October 2017 17:32:21 BST Raymond Jennings wrote:
>> Due to the removal of qt4, all of its reverse dependencies are also going
>> to be removed.
>>
>> This decision has already been made by the qt project and is not up for
>> discussion.
>>
>> Furthermore, qt4 has a large number of security bugs and it has also been
>> brought to my attention that it even fails to build in a few cases, and
>> finally it is no longer being maintained by upstream.  Therefore, due to
>> the build failures making it impossible to even install in a large number
>> of cases, and thus skype classic, I'm no longer going to maintain it.
>>
>> Anyone who really wants to keep classic skype still, feel free to install
>> the "kde sunset" overlay to recover the soon-to-be-removed qt4 dependencies
>> and for the moment make a snapshot of the ebuild before it is removed from
>> the portage tree.
>>
>> Also, even though they haven't *yet* followed through, microsoft has
>> announced already that the classic version of skype will eventually be
>> EOL'ed.  at the moment you're still able to install it as of 48 hours ago
>> last time I checked, but it is on the chopping block and likely will
>> eventually be removed from download, as well as banned from microsoft's
>> login servers.  Once this happens further usage will be impossible.
>>
>> No further support can be offered on skype classic, and it is eventually
>> going to be removed from the portage tree for the reasons listed above.
>
> Thank you for letting us know.
>
> I have already moved to net-im/skypeforlinux because cross-platform usage of
> (classic) skype started malfunctioning some months ago now.  Skypeforlinux
> works OK for me at present.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Mick

Reply via email to