On Wed, 27 May 2009 16:28:35 -0400
Wyatt Epp wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Jorge Morais > wrote:
>
> > I should mention that you should be careful about deleting any files -
> > and qfile is not a 100% guarantee that the file does not come from a
> > Por
On Sat, 23 May 2009 19:08:50 -0300
Jorge Morais wrote:
> One idea: you can can recompile python with a safe
> prefix (such as a subdir of your home), issue make install (not as root,
> for increased safety) and see where Python install its files relative to
> the prefix, so you can
On Wed, 27 May 2009 01:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
Jon Hardcastle wrote:
>
> I'd hope that if anyone else comes a cropper by this then at least this conv
> will help them! But I was EXPECTING portage to not let me do something that
> would stop the 'solution' (and that is what it is whether at the porta
On Fri, 22 May 2009 12:38:34 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 22 May 2009 07:40:28 -0300, Jorge Morais wrote:
>
> > > maybe you should just run a ~arch system.
> > I want a reliable system. Isn't ~arch quite less reliable than arch ?
>
> Not in my experie
On Sun, 24 May 2009 11:08:40 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 24 May 2009 00:08:50 Jorge Morais wrote:
> > On Sat, 23 May 2009 03:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> > Now, I do have concerns about your system having remains of multiple
> > python installations.
>
On Sun, 24 May 2009 01:52:45 -0700
Keith Dart wrote:
> On Sat, 23 May 2009 19:08:50 -0300
> Jorge Morais wrote:
>
> > Now, I do have concerns about your system having remains of multiple
> > python installations.
> >
> > Any person with python knowledge ca
On Sun, 24 May 2009 08:44:32 +0800
Kevin wrote:
> Hello,
> after reinstall my system, I can emerge neither emacs nor emacs-cvs
> successfully on my gentoo. when proceeded to the working fork check,
> it stops and hangs over, never go ahead.
>
> build.log:
> http://dpaste.com/hold/47083/
>
> a
On Sat, 23 May 2009 03:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
Jon Hardcastle wrote:
> >
> > And finally, couldn't he have gotten a binary package from
> > http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/default-linux/x86/dev-lang/
> > ?
Have you not yet tried to get python from a binary package?
See http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtop
On Sat, 23 May 2009 04:55:04 -0300
Jorge Morais wrote:
> Couldn't he have emerged python by invoking
> ebuild /usr/port/usr/portage/dev-lang/python/python-2.6.2.ebuild merge
> ?
> This would do everyting correctly.
> And wouldn't it work without Python, since it is writt
> Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!
>
> I followed this
>
> http://blogs.pwmn.net/korkakak/2008/06/04/gentoo-i-unmerged-python-now-what
>
> which worked - in the end. couple of caveats tho for anyone 'that follows'
> get python from their site as the ftp link in this article is out of date.
>
>
On Fri, 22 May 2009 09:00:05 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2009 21:41:22 -0300, Jorge Morais wrote:
>
> > Or maybe I should just stick to all-stable, so as to not be different,
> > and keep package.keywords for those packages where I really want a new
Hi. I used to think it was safe to use ~arch packages (through
package.keywords) on a stable system until I saw bug #257047 - GCC 4.3
didn't have a strict enough glibc dependency. And comment #15 in that
bug report is:
"[...] we don't test or support half-stable half-testing toolchai
On Wed, 13 May 2009 17:13:23 -0700
walt wrote:
> Jorge Morais wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 May 2009 07:50:47 -0700
> > walt wrote:
> >
> >> Jorge Morais wrote:
> >>> When starting evince from a terminal, I get a message like this:
> >>> ** (evi
On Sun, 10 May 2009 07:50:47 -0700
walt wrote:
> Jorge Morais wrote:
> > When starting evince from a terminal, I get a message like this:
> > ** (evince:3597): WARNING **: Failed to create dbus proxy for
> > org.gnome.SettingsDaemon:
> > Could not get owner of nam
When starting evince from a terminal, I get a message like this:
** (evince:3597): WARNING **: Failed to create dbus proxy for
org.gnome.SettingsDaemon: Could not get owner of name
'org.gnome.SettingsDaemon': no such name
3597 is evince's pid.
Does anybody know what causes this?
Should I worry
On Sat, 02 May 2009 20:34:02 +0300
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Hung Dang wrote:
> > Hi all
> > I have to emerge gcc-4.1.2 to use with CUDA. However, I receive the
> > following message.
> >
> > !!! 'gcc-4.1.2' is not a valid package atom.
> > !!! Please check ebuild(5) for full details.
> >
> >
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:23:24 -0500
Paul Hartman wrote:
> ebuild /usr/portage/foo-bar/yourpkg-1.2.3.ebuild unpack
> ebuild /usr/portage/foo-bar/yourpkg-1.2.3.ebuild prepare
> ebuild /usr/portage/foo-bar/yourpkg-1.2.3.ebuild configure
> ebuild /usr/portage/foo-bar/yourpkg-1.2.3.ebuild compile
> ebu
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:33:18 -0400
Denis wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am using a package called Rasmol, which is used for visualization of
> molecular structures. This software uses a certain table for atomic
> sizes, and I need to change some values in that table - it is stored
> in a header file
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:43:35 -0600
Joseph wrote:
> Does anybody have any links, instructions, information etc. on how to burn HD
> video MPEG4 to DVD?
> I want to be able to play HD on TV and I don't want to reduce the quality.
>
> Do I need Blue-Ray dvd recorder to be able to play HD recording
> On Monday 13 April 2009 20:49:44 Philip Webb wrote:
> > 090413 Philip Webb wrote:
> > > I've found out how to fix it: something is starting Plasma,
> > > so Htop to the rescue ! -- kill Plasma & the hideous mask is removed
> > > -- it appears at the very end of the KDE start-up process --
> > > &
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:57:37 -0400
ABCD wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jorge Morais wrote:
> > I want these two flags (--as-needed and --hash-style=gnu) to be active
> > before I adopt GCC 4.3 and recompile world.
>
> Just as an FYI,
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:56:20 -0700
Mark Knecht wrote:
> While not a KDE user I echo your thoughts. I'm personally a bit
> worried about Gentoo overlords sort of pushing this hald thing with
> reasons like 'Gnome's automounting depends on it'.
Where have you got that from? I have not heard of that
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:47:29 +0200
Justin wrote:
> Thanasis schrieb:
> > on 04/14/2009 11:09 PM Neil Bothwick wrote the following:
> >> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:01:23 +0300, Thanasis wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Suppose I want to set the series of kernel sources:
> >>> gentoo-sources-2.6.28*
> >>> wi
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:57:37 -0400
ABCD wrote:
> Jorge Morais wrote:
> > I want these two flags (--as-needed and --hash-style=gnu) to be active
> > before I adopt GCC 4.3 and recompile world.
>
> Just as an FYI, you do not need to rebuild the world when you upgrade
>
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:22:39 +0300
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Jorge Morais wrote:
> > Hi. According to discussion on gentoo-dev
> > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_50182554f851bedb82f8a349fbc90352.xml
> > it seems the only reasons for -Wl,--hash-style=gnu n
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:45:57 -0700
Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:33:06 -0500, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> >
> >> This doesn't tell me anything as far as I can see. Is there another way
> >> to turn up verbosity?
> >
> > mythf
ew packages with this flag, or do I need to
recompile the whole world? In other words, is there any incompatibility
between binaries linked with this flag and binaries linked with the default
hash-style (which in Gentoo is --hash-style=both, AFAIK)?
Regards,
Jorge Morais
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:43:46 -0700
Nick Fortino wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
> > On 2009-04-10, Paul Hartman wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> >>
> >>> Is something broken in the xfce ebuilds? emerge keeps wanting
> >>> to install xscreensaver ev
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:55:36 +0200
Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> > I have seen some FORTIFY_SOURCE bugs in the bugzilla and in some
> > cases, people claim the the bug lies in the FORTIFY_SOURCE feature
> > itself (that is, people claim that FORTIFY_SOURCE misidentifies a
> > buffer overflow). One exa
From the info page of GCC 4.3.3
NOTE: In Gentoo, `-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2' is set by default, and is
activated when `-O' is set to 2 or higher. This enables additional
compile-time and run-time checks for several libc functions. To
disable, specify either `-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE' or
`-
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:12:30 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > I wish I could provide more information, the cursor just seats there, there
> > is no error messages at the console. Which log " revdep-rebuild" writes to?
> >
> > I'm rebuilding the system with the old CFLAGS so I'll have more informatio
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 00:02:21 -0600
Joseph wrote:
> On 04/03/09 10:34, alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
> >Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and
> >performed "emerge system" ?
> >What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell...
> >
> >--
> > ~adj~
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:23:55 +0200
Tom wrote:
> >I have since fsck'ed all relevant partitions in /dev/hda and they came
> >up clean. Am I safe?
>
> Hmm, I'd say yes. I mean, in what way should using hdparm really mess
> up your partitions or Filesystems in such a way, that they'd be beyond
> reco
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 07:00:21 +0300
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote:
> >
> > I then shut the computer down and I writing this from a liveCD.
> > I do not even want to access the disk read only without knowing I have
> > not messed up.
> >
> > So: does anybody know i
> > Looking at /usr/portage/app-editors/emacs/emacs-22.3-r2.ebuild, I see
> > that it depends unconditionally on app-emacs/emacs-common-gentoo.
> > You cannot eliminate this dependency by changing USE flags.
> > The most natural solution is to tell Portage to accept the package
> > app-emacs/emacs-
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:47:56 -0400
"John P. Burkett" wrote:
> Starting March 14, whenever I have tried doing
> emerge -D -uav system
> the response has included
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy
> ">=app-emacs/emacs-common-gentoo-1[X]" have been masked.
>
> On my x86 box, the response adds
>
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:48:22 -0400
Eric Martin wrote:
> Also, the kernel is the last place that you want to drag
> your feet for updates. If there's a bug in the kernel I want to have it
> fixed asap. Granted you can also argue that I'm injecting buggy code.
> It's two sides of the same coin.
>
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:36:41 +0500
Mike Kazantsev wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:13:38 -0300
> Jorge Morais wrote:
>
> > If you had upgraded because of a needed feature, I assume you would
> > have read about the release, and thus would know about Tuz.
> > So you
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:50:46 +0200
Thanasis wrote:
> Has anyone seen the boot logo in 2.6.29-gentoo sources?
> usr/src/linux/drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_vga16.ppm
>
> Why did they substitute the penguin with this ugly disguised mouse?
>
>
If you had upgraded because of a needed feature, I as
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:49:12 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > msoul...@anton:~$ equery belongs /usr/include/linux/quota.h
> > [ Searching for file(s) /usr/include/linux/quota.h in *... ]
> > sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.6.23-r3 (/usr/include/linux/quota.h)
> >
> > ul...@anton:~$ uname -a
> > Linux ant
40 matches
Mail list logo
