On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 16:50:45 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I'm thinking of separating /usr onto its own partition so that I can
> have it mounted read-only except while updating it. I'd prefer not to
> have to make an init thingy, not having needed one up to now. Besides,
> some machines have thi
On 2022-09-14, Grant Edwards wrote:
> OTOH, gtk3-classic is a set of source patches that get added to the
> "normal" gtk portage directory.
I didn't state that very well -- the patches are installed into the
/etc/portage/patches directory for gtk+, not into the normal portage
db for gtk+.
--
Gr
On 2022-09-14, Meik Frischke wrote:
> Am 2022-09-14 19:21, schrieb Grant Edwards:
>> Meld just updated from 3.20.4 to 3.22.0 (I have ~amd64 set for meld),
>> and now meld uses client side decorations instead of allowing the
>> window manager to handle that stuff. [...]
>>
>> For now, I'm goint to
Dale:
...
[ re separate /usr, initramfs/initrd ]
> You may can do it the way you are wanting to but for how long is the
> question. Odds are high that at some point, you will have a system that
> won't boot because something that's needed isn't there.
...
initrd/initramfs is there to make life e
Am 2022-09-14 19:21, schrieb Grant Edwards:
Meld just updated from 3.20.4 to 3.22.0 (I have ~amd64 set for meld),
and now meld uses client side decorations instead of allowing the
window manager to handle that stuff. This is extremely annoying, since
meld looks/acts differently than everything el
Meld just updated from 3.20.4 to 3.22.0 (I have ~amd64 set for meld),
and now meld uses client side decorations instead of allowing the
window manager to handle that stuff. This is extremely annoying, since
meld looks/acts differently than everything else and a lot of window
operations are now un
Laurence Perkins wrote:
>> By the way, if someone wants to take this and make a how to out of it
>> somewhere, I think it would be great. This is doable. I even rebooted
>> and even tho the drives changed SATA ports, it worked fine. So, I guess
>> I did it right, even if no one thought it could
Laurence Perkins wrote:
>> By the way, if someone wants to take this and make a how to out of it
>> somewhere, I think it would be great. This is doable. I even rebooted
>> and even tho the drives changed SATA ports, it worked fine. So, I guess
>> I did it right, even if no one thought it could
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I'm thinking of separating /usr onto its own partition so that I can have it
> mounted read-only except while updating it. I'd prefer not to have to make an
> init thingy, not having needed one up to now. Besides, some machines have
> things like early-uco
On 14/09/2022 14:55, Dale wrote:
I see the point but wasn't aware there was more than one way to do it
with cryptsetup. It seems there is several options for this. I was
pretty sure LVM was on bottom and mentioned it in my original post.
After reading your post, I got to wondering, did I do thi
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 12:17 PM Laurence Perkins wrote:
>
> If something you need for booting with separate /usr is missing that would be
> a FSH bug and is probably worth reporting unless you're doing something truly
> arcane with your system.
>
You can always ask upstream but just about ever
>-Original Message-
>From: Peter Humphrey
>Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2022 8:51 AM
>To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
>Subject: [gentoo-user] Separate /usr partition
>
>CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Do not click links or open attachments
>unless you recognize the sender and k
Peter:
> I'm thinking of separating /usr onto its own partition so that I can have it
> mounted read-only except while updating it. I'd prefer not to have to make an
> init thingy, not having needed one up to now. Besides, some machines have
> things like early-ucode or amd-uc.
>
> I've found a
>By the way, if someone wants to take this and make a how to out of it
>somewhere, I think it would be great. This is doable. I even rebooted
>and even tho the drives changed SATA ports, it worked fine. So, I guess
>I did it right, even if no one thought it could be done. lol
>
>I really hope
Hello list,
I'm thinking of separating /usr onto its own partition so that I can have it
mounted read-only except while updating it. I'd prefer not to have to make an
init thingy, not having needed one up to now. Besides, some machines have
things like early-ucode or amd-uc.
I've found a few g
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 12:40:21AM -0500 schrieb Dale:
>
>> Now to replace my /home drive which is also close to full. It's not
>> encrypted tho. The biggest difference in this and plain LVM, resizing
>> with cryptsetup or close and reopen. Keep in mind, while I did al
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 08:55:26AM -0500 schrieb Dale:
>
>> I see the point but wasn't aware there was more than one way to do it
>> with cryptsetup. It seems there is several options for this. I was
>> pretty sure LVM was on bottom and mentioned it in my original post
Am Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 08:55:26AM -0500 schrieb Dale:
> I see the point but wasn't aware there was more than one way to do it
> with cryptsetup. It seems there is several options for this. I was
> pretty sure LVM was on bottom and mentioned it in my original post.
Indeed you did and it confus
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 1:40 AM Dale wrote:
>> Now to replace my /home drive which is also close to full. It's not
>> encrypted tho. The biggest difference in this and plain LVM, resizing
>> with cryptsetup or close and reopen. Keep in mind, while I did all
>> this, LUKS, c
Am Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 12:40:21AM -0500 schrieb Dale:
> Now to replace my /home drive which is also close to full. It's not
> encrypted tho. The biggest difference in this and plain LVM, resizing
> with cryptsetup or close and reopen. Keep in mind, while I did all
> this, LUKS, cryptsetup, what
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 1:40 AM Dale wrote:
>
> Now to replace my /home drive which is also close to full. It's not
> encrypted tho. The biggest difference in this and plain LVM, resizing
> with cryptsetup or close and reopen. Keep in mind, while I did all
> this, LUKS, cryptsetup, whatever was
21 matches
Mail list logo
