Hi,
i made good experience with "Tree Style Tab" so far.
Source: https://github.com/piroor/treestyletab
https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/tree-style-tab/
As the name suggest it comes with more feature than tab-grouping. You get an
additional Tab bar in a tree style. One tab can have a
CVE https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-4013 I
notice that x265 ffmpeg and other video stuff is rebuilding now. What
ebuild is required for the patch to that CVE?
--
Walter Dnes
I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications
On October 22, 2018 7:26:53 AM Philip Webb wrote:
181015 Philip Webb wrote:
The big question is whether I can still group tabs,
whether directly with FF or via some add-on (whatever they're now called).
I've now been using FF for a few days & can report my experience.
There doesn't seem t
181015 Philip Webb wrote:
> The big question is whether I can still group tabs,
> whether directly with FF or via some add-on (whatever they're now called).
I've now been using FF for a few days & can report my experience.
There doesn't seem to be an add-on which reproduces the old version.
Howeve
181022 Philip Webb wrote:
> /usr/lib64/libKF5Declarative.so.5: undefined reference to
> `QQmlPropertyMap::init(QMetaObject const*)@Qt_5'
> /usr/lib64/libKF5Declarative.so.5: undefined reference to
> `QQmlPropertyMap::allocatePrivate()@Qt_5'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[2]:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 7:15 AM Philip Webb wrote:
>
> 181021 Franz Fellner wrote:
> > the actual error really is missing.
> > Can you use pastebin or something similar to upload the whole build.log?
> > The number of cores may help to estimate the unmber of compilation units
> > that still get bu
181021 Franz Fellner wrote:
> the actual error really is missing.
> Can you use pastebin or something similar to upload the whole build.log?
> The number of cores may help to estimate the unmber of compilation units
> that still get built. Unfortunately not with cmake. It usually continues
> buil
Franz Fellner wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
> the actual error really is missing.
> Can you use pastebin or something similar to upload the whole build.log?
>
> The number of cores may help to estimate the unmber of compilation
> units that still get built.
> Unfortunately not with cmake. It usually continu
Hi Philipp,
the actual error really is missing.
Can you use pastebin or something similar to upload the whole build.log?
The number of cores may help to estimate the unmber of compilation units
that still get built.
Unfortunately not with cmake. It usually continues building targets that do
not de
181021 Dale wrote:
> You need to go back further on your copy n paste.
> The first error I see error 2. Somewhere further back is error 1.
I don't think so : isn't that the type of error taken from a list ?
I don't see another error higher up.
> That is the first trigger and may point to a probl
10 matches
Mail list logo