> Which official released released versions V1.0, V2.0 etc contain a
> particular commit C1ABCDE?
> Unfortunately I know of no direct way of answering either question with
> the web UI of github
Talking about github - you can open the commit page (say, https://github.com/
torvalds/linux/commit/fa
Ian Zimmerman writes:
> On 2018-03-25 17:49, Martin Vaeth wrote:
>
>> It should be scrnsaverproto-1.2.2-r2 which is pulled in.
>> Maybe you sync'ed at an unfortunate moment. Try emerge --sync again.
>
> In my case at least, the root cause was this: in the nightly webrsync
> snapshot (which I pref
2018-03-25 22:25 GMT+03:00 Ian Zimmerman :
> On 2018-03-25 17:49, Martin Vaeth wrote:
>
>> It should be scrnsaverproto-1.2.2-r2 which is pulled in.
>> Maybe you sync'ed at an unfortunate moment. Try emerge --sync again.
>
> In my case at least, the root cause was this: in the nightly webrsync
> sna
2018-03-25 22:02 GMT+03:00 Dale :
> gevisz wrote:
>> 2018-03-25 21:40 GMT+03:00 Franz Fellner :
>>> Just a stupid question: Did you add =scrnsaverproto-1.2.2-r1 to
>>> package.mask?
>> No. Actually, I do not need screensaver at all.
>>
>>> Because the -r2 is stable and nothing should prevent it fro
On 2018-03-25 17:49, Martin Vaeth wrote:
> It should be scrnsaverproto-1.2.2-r2 which is pulled in.
> Maybe you sync'ed at an unfortunate moment. Try emerge --sync again.
In my case at least, the root cause was this: in the nightly webrsync
snapshot (which I prefer to use instead of rsync),
scrns
gevisz wrote:
> 2018-03-25 21:40 GMT+03:00 Franz Fellner :
>> Just a stupid question: Did you add =scrnsaverproto-1.2.2-r1 to
>> package.mask?
> No. Actually, I do not need screensaver at all.
>
>> Because the -r2 is stable and nothing should prevent it from being merged...
> But something does pre
2018-03-25 21:40 GMT+03:00 Franz Fellner :
> Just a stupid question: Did you add =scrnsaverproto-1.2.2-r1 to
> package.mask?
No. Actually, I do not need screensaver at all.
> Because the -r2 is stable and nothing should prevent it from being merged...
But something does prevent it from being mer
Just a stupid question: Did you add =scrnsaverproto-1.2.2-r1 to
package.mask? Because the -r2 is stable and nothing should prevent it from
being merged...
I am running partly testing and the time xorg-proto was added I had to deal
with hard blocks which I circumvented by un-keywording (remove from
2018-03-25 20:38 GMT+03:00 gevisz :
> 2018-03-25 15:50 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick :
>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 15:19:33 +0300, gevisz wrote:
>>
>>> It seems that newly introduced x11-base/xorg-proto-2018.4 package
>>> blocks everything else. What to do?
>>> Is there better option in this case than unmergi
Akater wrote:
> I just tried
>
>> emerge --ask --verbose --update --oneshot x11-base/xorg-proto x11-proto/s=
> crnsaverproto
>
> > (x11-proto/scrnsaverproto-1.2.2-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
> >x11-proto/scrnsaverproto
It should be scrnsaverproto-1.2.2-r2 which is pulled in.
Mayb
2018-03-25 15:50 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick :
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 15:19:33 +0300, gevisz wrote:
>
>> It seems that newly introduced x11-base/xorg-proto-2018.4 package
>> blocks everything else. What to do?
>> Is there better option in this case than unmerging xorg-server?
>> Thank you.
>>
>> # emerg
The subject question of my message is stated in the last paragraph.
Helmut Jarausch writes:
> Try to emerge x11-base/xorg-proto and x11-proto/scrnsaverproto
> simultaneously.
I just tried
> emerge --ask --verbose --update --oneshot x11-base/xorg-proto
> x11-proto/scrnsaverproto
and it didn
On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 08:10:29 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > The only hard block here appears to be xscrnsaverproto, unmerge that
> > and the rest should take care of themselves. I had all the soft
> > blocks today but not that one, and everything worked fine.
>
> But ... I actually have packag
Very often, for a some large FLOSS project (often but not always
packaged by gentoo) I am interested in answering the question:
Which official released released versions V1.0, V2.0 etc contain a
particular commit C1ABCDE?
Using branches as an imperfect but mostly OK proxy for releases, the
questi
On 03/25/2018 05:10:29 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
On 2018-03-25 13:50, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> The only hard block here appears to be xscrnsaverproto, unmerge
that and
> the rest should take care of themselves. I had all the soft blocks
today
> but not that one, and everything worked fine.
Bu
On 2018-03-25 13:50, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> The only hard block here appears to be xscrnsaverproto, unmerge that and
> the rest should take care of themselves. I had all the soft blocks today
> but not that one, and everything worked fine.
But ... I actually have packages that depend on scrnsaver
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:47 AM, wrote:
> is there a way to download the archive (or how is it called in the
> world of Ubuntu ?) of a program, from which I only know the apt-get
> and apt-install commands?
A "deb" file, which you can expand with "ar" (no need to install "dpkg").
> And how ca
On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 15:19:33 +0300, gevisz wrote:
> It seems that newly introduced x11-base/xorg-proto-2018.4 package
> blocks everything else. What to do?
> Is there better option in this case than unmerging xorg-server?
> Thank you.
>
> # emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse --backtra
Hi,
is there a way to download the archive (or how is it called in the
world of Ubuntu ?) of a program, from which I only know the
apt-get and apt-install commands?
And how can I do the same for a developer release of that program
when I additionally know the ppa (whatever that is...?)
I onlu ne
It seems that newly introduced x11-base/xorg-proto-2018.4 package
blocks everything else. What to do?
Is there better option in this case than unmerging xorg-server?
Thank you.
# emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse --backtrack=90 --ask world
These are the packages that would be merged,
20 matches
Mail list logo
