On 17/03/18 13:53, Fast Turtle wrote:
> So ask
> youself, why in hell they needed more then 4M? I could see 8M being a
> selling point but 64M - hell the first computer I build only had 16M
> (that was a 386 system).
Because buying new 8Mb chips is expensive, and 64Mb is cheaper?
Seriously, newer
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 9:53 AM, Fast Turtle wrote:
>
> All this does is makes damn sure I will not buy any used hardware
> since you can change embed into the UEFI firmware what ever you want -
To be fair that is hardly anything new either. Sure, this particular
attack is new, but the concept h
Main issue is you need "PHYSICAL"access to carry these attacks out.
It's that god damn simple. If they can physically access the system,
it doesn't matter how good the security it because "THEY' own it.
All this does is makes damn sure I will not buy any used hardware
since you can change embed in
3 matches
Mail list logo
