On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 09:00 +0200, Raffaele Belardi wrote:
> I hava a build problem upgrading Mythtv to 0.28.1-r1 [1] on an ~amd64
> system. The problem is related to a glibc API change [2] introduced
> in
> glibc-2.24 and still present in glibc-2.25. So I'm thinking to try
> the
> build with an ol
On Mon, 2017-08-21 at 22:21 -0400, John Covici wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:20:04 -0400,
> Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
> >
> I deleted RUBYTARGETS from make.conf, ran eselect to make ruby22 the
> default, but when I ran emerge --depclean I still have packages
> pulling ruby21 as follows:
>
> Calcu
> On 21 Aug 2017, at 12:49, mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote:
>
> I'm excited about using gentoo, though the online instructions could really
> use more structuring, i.e. it's hard to avoid reading the parts you don't
> need to and the "flow" is rather lost. It's an extremely verbose
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:20:04 -0400,
Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
>
>
> On 08/21/2017 10:13 AM, allan gottlieb wrote:
> >
> > I issued emerge --pretend --verbose --depclean =ruby-2.1.9
> > and the response was
> >
> > dev-lang/ruby
> > selected: 2.1.9
> > protected: none
> > omitted:
On Mon, Aug 21 2017, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
> On 08/21/2017 10:13 AM, allan gottlieb wrote:
>>
>> I issued emerge --pretend --verbose --depclean =ruby-2.1.9
>> and the response was
>>
>> dev-lang/ruby
>> selected: 2.1.9
>> protected: none
>> omitted: 2.2.6
>>
>> Am I correct in b
On 08/21/2017 10:13 AM, allan gottlieb wrote:
I issued emerge --pretend --verbose --depclean =ruby-2.1.9
and the response was
dev-lang/ruby
selected: 2.1.9
protected: none
omitted: 2.2.6
Am I correct in believing it is now safe to issue
emerge --depclean =ruby-2.1.9
than
On 21 August 2017 20:04:30 GMT+02:00, Rasmus Thomsen
wrote:
>The problem with email providers which store all emails encrypted ( as
>in end-to-end ) is that they usually require a specific app ( providers
>could be protonmail, tutanota etc. ). Both of which don't support
>bottom posting ( well ),
On Monday, 21 August 2017 12:49:27 BST mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com
wrote:
> Any likely problems if i install the stage3 tarball etc. under centos6.6?
> tried the live dvd but it has problems with my current graphics card
> (framebuffer driver).
I haven't tried out installing Gentoo usin
On Monday, 21 August 2017 11:35:44 BST Ralph Seichter wrote:
> On 21.08.2017 08:08, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > Ah, so silentoldconfig is effectively the same as old config.
>
> Silentoldconfig is quite a useful make target, since it only asks about
> newly introduced kernel options.
... and it also
The problem with email providers which store all emails encrypted ( as in
end-to-end ) is that they usually require a specific app ( providers could be
protonmail, tutanota etc. ). Both of which don't support bottom posting ( well
), at least on mobile devices
Rasmus
Original Message
On Monday, August 21, 2017 6:44:07 PM CEST Dale wrote:
> mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote:
> > precisely what happened, sorry i didn't realize that chainging the
> > "subject" line causes confusion. now i know, now i can avoid that
> > mistake.
>
> > 21. Aug 2017 09:37 by rdalek1...@gmai
mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote:
> precisely what happened, sorry i didn't realize that chainging the
> "subject" line causes confusion. now i know, now i can avoid that
> mistake.
>
> --
> Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim your encrypted mailbox today!
> https://tutanota.com
>
> 21. A
precisely what happened, sorry i didn't realize that chainging the "subject"
line causes confusion. now i know, now i can avoid that mistake.
--
Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim your encrypted mailbox today!
https://tutanota.com
21. Aug 2017 09:37 by rdalek1...@gmail.com:
> > mad.sc
On Mon, Aug 21 2017, Hans de Graaff wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 08:26:49 -0600, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
>
>> I don't believe that will be enough. You should update RUBY_TARGETS in
>> /etc/portage/make.conf if you have it set. If you don't have it set and
>> are still getting this error, that's a
mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote:
> refering to the amd64 handbook, at gentoo.org "downloading the stage
> tarball" where it says "
>
>
> Downloading the stage tarball
>
> Go to the Gentoo mount point where the root file system is mounted
> (most likely /mnt/gentoo):
>
> |root #||c
ok, rereading the part on preparing the drive i see the target partition for
the new gentoo root was meant. no problem.
--
Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim your encrypted mailbox today!
https://tutanota.com
21. Aug 2017 08:47 by mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com:
> refering to the amd
refering to the amd64 handbook, at gentoo.org "downloading the stage tarball"
where it says "
Downloading the stage tarball
Go to the Gentoo mount point where the root file system is mounted (most likely
/mnt/gentoo):
root #cd /mnt/gentoo"
does that mean to change to where gentoo will be inst
Nice cross posting "fairly experienced at linux" guy...
Regards
On 08/21/2017 07:49 AM, mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote:
fairly experienced at linux
TL;DR: re-sync and you should be fine.
On 08/20/2017 12:36 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
Not sure I understand.
1. I should have been more complete about the command I run
MAKEOPTS="--jobs=8 --load-average=5"
emerge --ask --deep --tree --jobs --load-average=5 \
--update --ch
On 21.08.2017 13:49, mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote:
> I'm excited about using gentoo, though the online instructions could
> really use more structuring, i.e. it's hard to avoid reading the parts
> you don't need to and the "flow" is rather lost. It's an extremely
> verbose document wh
Any likely problems if i install the stage3 tarball etc. under centos6.6?
tried the live dvd but it has problems with my current graphics card
(framebuffer driver).
I'm excited about using gentoo, though the online instructions could really use
more structuring, i.e. it's hard to avoid readi
Hi,
if I emerge media-gfx/hugin with ~amd64 it builds and installs
media-gfx/hugin-2017.0 without any errors. But after that it's missing
/usr/bin/hugin.
Building media-gfx/hugin-2016.2.0 works.
Is this a known problem?
kind regards
Wolfgang
On 21.08.2017 08:08, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Ah, so silentoldconfig is effectively the same as old config.
Silentoldconfig is quite a useful make target, since it only asks about
newly introduced kernel options.
> Does your old kernel still work ad before? Just wondering if another
> update could
23 matches
Mail list logo
