On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 06/22/2017 04:57 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
>>>
>>> It would be against our ebuild policy if it does so. The sources for a
>>> package should be listed in SRC_URI and are downloaded and verified by
>>> your Gentoo package manager. After that, ne
On 2017-06-22 11:31, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
>> I just installed firefox-bin and did not feel any difference.
>>
>> I will try to compile firefox just for curiosity.
>
> Well. Only flags that can give you any difference is bindist (logos and so
> on),
> pgo (hard-way optimization), cu
On 06/22/2017 04:57 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
>>
>> It would be against our ebuild policy if it does so. The sources for a
>> package should be listed in SRC_URI and are downloaded and verified by
>> your Gentoo package manager. After that, network access is forbidden.
>>
>
> You might be interested in th
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 06/22/2017 10:41 AM, R0b0t1 wrote:
>>
>> This is kind of troubling because much like Cabal it seems like the
>> Rust package management system is insecure. Does the Firefox build
>> process make use of it?
>>
>
> It would be against our
On 06/22/2017 10:41 AM, R0b0t1 wrote:
>
> This is kind of troubling because much like Cabal it seems like the
> Rust package management system is insecure. Does the Firefox build
> process make use of it?
>
It would be against our ebuild policy if it does so. The sources for a
package should be
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Nils Freydank wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2017, 16:41:54 CEST schrieb R0b0t1:
>> [other quote]
>> This is kind of troubling because much like Cabal it seems like the
>> Rust package management system is insecure. Does the Firefox build
>> process make use of
Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2017, 16:41:54 CEST schrieb R0b0t1:
> [other quote]
> This is kind of troubling because much like Cabal it seems like the
> Rust package management system is insecure. Does the Firefox build
> process make use of it?
Could you please specify what in your eyes is insecure in
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 2:13 AM, Danny YUE wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I just found during upgrading my system that Firefox 54.0 depends on
> dev-lang/rust and cannot be disabled?!
>
> It really takes a long time to compile rust, and I do not want to add
> such a burden to my system compilation time.
>
Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2017, 13:33:33 CEST schrieb Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov:
> > >=dev-lang/rust-1.15.1 to >=dev-lang/rust-1.15.1-bin.
>
> ... to >=dev-lang/rust-bin-1.15.1
>
> // fixed ;) /* Thanks! */
err... thanks! =-D
--
GPG fingerprint: '00EF D31F 1B60 D5DB ADB8 31C1 C0EC E696 0E54 475B
> >=dev-lang/rust-1.15.1 to >=dev-lang/rust-1.15.1-bin.
... to >=dev-lang/rust-bin-1.15.1
// fixed ;)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
> I just installed firefox-bin and did not feel any difference.
>
> I will try to compile firefox just for curiosity.
Well. Only flags that can give you any difference is bindist (logos and so on),
pgo (hard-way optimization), custom-*, and system-* ones.
So, taking default "fx-bin" vs "fx" doe
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2017, 09:13:24 CEST schrieb Danny YUE:
> Hi guys,
> I just found during upgrading my system that Firefox 54.0 depends on
> dev-lang/rust and cannot be disabled?!
as mentioned by others here FF 54 uses now some code written in Rust, so
USE="-rust" could not build the b
On 2017-06-22 08:27, Alexey Eschenko wrote:
> For me it was a *slightly* less quicker start. Which I think don't means
> much when speaking about browser.
>
>
> On 06/22/2017 11:09 AM, Danny YUE wrote:
>> On 2017-06-22 07:43, Rasmus Thomsen wrote:
>>> I'm using firefox-bin ( and libreoffice-bin
For me it was a *slightly* less quicker start. Which I think don't means
much when speaking about browser.
On 06/22/2017 11:09 AM, Danny YUE wrote:
On 2017-06-22 07:43, Rasmus Thomsen wrote:
I'm using firefox-bin ( and libreoffice-bin ) on my laptop and I didn't have
problems with either of
On 2017-06-22 07:43, Rasmus Thomsen wrote:
> I'm using firefox-bin ( and libreoffice-bin ) on my laptop and I didn't have
> problems with either of them
>
> Regards,
> Rasmus
> Original Message
> On 22 Jun 2017, 09:34, Danny YUE wrote:
>
> On 2017-06-22 07:23, Vadim A. Misbakh-
Last time I used libreoffice-bin and firefox-bin, first was really hard
to satisfy dependencies (I was needed some packages to downgrade to old
versions incompatible to other packages in my system). But with
firefox-bin a had no such problem.
But it was "last time".
On 06/22/2017 10:34 AM, D
I'm using firefox-bin ( and libreoffice-bin ) on my laptop and I didn't have
problems with either of them
Regards,
Rasmus
Original Message
On 22 Jun 2017, 09:34, Danny YUE wrote:
On 2017-06-22 07:23, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
>> Does anyone knows why? Any idea?
> The re
On 2017-06-22 07:23, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
>> Does anyone knows why? Any idea?
> The reason is in that fact, that many of it's components are in rust.
> And since it was possible to dodge it until now, maintainers considered it is
> not a way since now.
>
> And, by the way, it is not t
> Does anyone knows why? Any idea?
The reason is in that fact, that many of it's components are in rust.
And since it was possible to dodge it until now, maintainers considered it is
not a way since now.
And, by the way, it is not that many time to build rust, as you think:
> Thu Jun 22 12:34
Hi,
since firefox 54 rust isn't optional anymore, you could use firefox 52
esr/firefox-bin (?) if you don't want to compile rust.
Regards,
Rasmus
Original Message
On 22 Jun 2017, 09:13, Danny YUE wrote:
Hi guys,
I just found during upgrading my system that Firefox 54.0 depend
Hi guys,
I just found during upgrading my system that Firefox 54.0 depends on
dev-lang/rust and cannot be disabled?!
It really takes a long time to compile rust, and I do not want to add
such a burden to my system compilation time.
Does anyone knows why? Any idea?
Thanks.
Danny
21 matches
Mail list logo
