I'm using firefox-bin ( and libreoffice-bin ) on my laptop and I didn't have 
problems with either of them

Regards,
Rasmus
-------- Original Message --------
On 22 Jun 2017, 09:34, Danny YUE wrote:

On 2017-06-22 07:23, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov  wrote:
>> Does anyone knows why? Any idea?
> The reason is in that fact, that many of it's components are in rust.
> And since it was possible to dodge it until now, maintainers considered it is
> not a way since now.
>
> And, by the way, it is not that many time to build rust, as you think:
>> Thu Jun 22 12:34:00 2017 >>> dev-lang/rust-1.16.0
>> merge time: 1 hour, 48 minutes.
> Than was on 1.9GHz with hardly limited portage (MAKEOPTS="-j5 -l2",
> NICENESS=18, ionice -c3, and cgroupped on cpu shares and ram).
>
> So, ~20 mins would be enough on non-limited portage and full power of that i7.

Thank you all for replying.

So it can be around 30~40 minutes or so on my i5 machine.
Just it feels strange to install something large that I would probably
never use myself.

I am considering using binary package instead of compiling it myself.

But I am afraid that using firefox-bin package would cause some
dependency problem. I once tried libreoffice-bin, but found it really
painful to resolve dependency issues during system upgrading.

Anyone tried firefox-bin smoothly?

Danny
@mva.name>

Reply via email to