On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:33 AM, Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 06/04/2017 03:54 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> Well, a plugin to make a browser barely usable. But what about a
>> functionality allegedly built in?
>>
>>
> Even stranger, chromium allowed me to block the URL you were trying to
> block.
>
How?
With chromium recompiled with the 'system-ffmpeg' USE flag disabled, I
can now play imdb.com videos without any trouble.
The Arch Linux PKGBUILD for chromium has this system library disabled
as well. See
https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/plain/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/chromium.
Th
On 06/04/2017 09:28 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> My firewall (dd-wrt) does not opening specific port.
>
> In NAT(QoS) tab I have:
> forward from port 4569 to internal IP port 4569 (this is an asterisk IAX
> port);
>
> netstat -a |grep 4569
> udp0 0 0.0.0.0:45690.0.
My firewall (dd-wrt) does not opening specific port.
In NAT(QoS) tab I have:
forward from port 4569 to internal IP port 4569 (this is an asterisk IAX
port);
netstat -a |grep 4569
udp0 0 0.0.0.0:45690.0.0.0:*
But when I check this port via ShieldsUP! it keeps showing me i
On 06/04/2017 03:54 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Corbin Bird wrote:
>
>> Using Chromium and uMatrix / uBlock Origin Plugins, no problem with the
>> page. No ads or Java errors.
>> ( No, not the 'www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins'. )
>>
> Well, a plugin to make a bro
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 08:23:22 +0200
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>> Or you could use Ubuntu.
>
> Can you please refrain from such phrases.
History with Alab G.
As an Ubuntu user, perhaps I should take offense! :)
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Corbin Bird wrote:
> Using Chromium and uMatrix / uBlock Origin Plugins, no problem with the
> page. No ads or Java errors.
> ( No, not the 'www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins'. )
>
Well, a plugin to make a browser barely usable. But what about a
functionality alle
On 06/04/2017 09:39 AM, Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 06/04/2017 02:17 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> I just had the experience of visiting a linux-related site
>> (http://libv.livejournal.com/22968.html) and seeing a panel with ads
>> about house appliances (from a site I had actually visited before).
>> T
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Rasmus Thomsen
wrote:
> Sorry, should've tried it myself before answering. I'm using Chromium
> 58.0.3029.110 ( 64 bit though ) built with cups,gconf,pulseaudio and it
> works for me ( both with extensions enabled and without any )
>
I have chromium built with the
Sorry, should've tried it myself before answering. I'm using Chromium
58.0.3029.110 ( 64 bit though ) built with cups,gconf,pulseaudio and it works
for me ( both with extensions enabled and without any )
Original Message
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Imdb videos won't play in Chro
It doesn't work for me either with chromium.
It seems to be some kind of supported video format negotiation error
with javascript or something; or CORS or who knows. For some reason a
suitable encoding can't be found and it fails with a log message in
debugging console as well.
However if going to
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Rasmus Thomsen
wrote:
> So chromium does detect flash, that's something ;)
>
> Please go to advanced settings → content settings and allow flash for all
> sites ( just to test it - don't use this config as daily driver
>
> Original Message
>
> On 4
So chromium does detect flash, that's something ;)
Please go to advanced settings → content settings and allow flash for all sites
( just to test it - don't use this config as daily driver
Original Message
On 4 Jun 2017, 18:41, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 6:
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Rasmus Thomsen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does chromium even recognize flash? Go to chrome://flash, it should display
> the current flash version under "Flash Plugin".
> About the YouTube thing:
> Are you sure that it doesn't use its HTML5 player? You can to go
> youtube.com/
Hi,
Does chromium even recognize flash? Go to chrome://flash, it should display the
current flash version under "Flash Plugin".
About the YouTube thing:
Are you sure that it doesn't use its HTML5 player? You can to go
youtube.com/html5 to check that.
Regards,
Rasmus
Original Message -
On 06/04/2017 07:39 AM, Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 06/04/2017 02:17 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> I just had the experience of visiting a linux-related site
>> (http://libv.livejournal.com/22968.html) and seeing a panel with ads
>> about house appliances (from a site I had actually visited before).
>> T
On 06/04/2017 02:17 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> I just had the experience of visiting a linux-related site
> (http://libv.livejournal.com/22968.html) and seeing a panel with ads
> about house appliances (from a site I had actually visited before).
> The panel actually blocks part of the page, and is
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 08:17:40 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>
>> With these installed:
>> equery -q l chromium adobe-flash
>> www-client/chromium-58.0.3029.110
>> www-plugins/adobe-flash-25.0.0.171
>>
>> Imdb.com videos won't play any more. I
I just had the experience of visiting a linux-related site
(http://libv.livejournal.com/22968.html) and seeing a panel with ads
about house appliances (from a site I had actually visited before).
The panel actually blocks part of the page, and is impossible to
remove. This is caused by some javascr
On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 08:17:40 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> With these installed:
> equery -q l chromium adobe-flash
> www-client/chromium-58.0.3029.110
> www-plugins/adobe-flash-25.0.0.171
>
> Imdb.com videos won't play any more. I get a 'sorry, this video is
> unsupported on this browser' mes
20 matches
Mail list logo
