On Tuesday 14 Feb 2017 01:51:01 wabe wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > Have you noticed a difference between mounting partitions on them
> > with the discard option, Vs running fstrim on a cron job?
>
> I noticed a big performance impact with my old Corsair 60GB SSD
> (Force3 IIRC) when I used the discar
Willie Mattthews writes:
> If I am not mistaken you would need to install,
>
> * app-emulation/virtualbox-guest-additions
> Available versions: 4.3.38 ~4.3.40 ~5.0.16 ~5.0.30 5.0.32 ~5.1.12
> ~5.1.14 {X KERNEL="linux"}
> Homepage:http://www.virtualbox.org/
> Descriptio
Johannes Rosenberger [17-02-14 02:43]:
> On 13.02.2017 19:20, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Johannes Rosenberger [17-02-13 19:04]:
> >> On 13.02.2017 17:57, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hogren [17-02-13 17:06]:
> On 13/02/2017 04:42, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
Mick wrote:
> On Monday 13 Feb 2017 13:17:14 Poison BL. wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Daniel Frey
> > wrote:
> > > On 02/12/2017 02:40 PM, Alan Grimes wrote:
> > > > So does anyone have any evidence of a current generation SSD
> > > > lasting more than 20 days?
> > >
> > >
On 02/13/2017 04:11 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Setup:
>gentoo (no-X) installed into vbox vm on win 10 (64bit) host.
>
> I've gotten a solid base going but now want to setup LXDE. Gentoo LXDE
> wiki starts after you've already setup the X server so I went to Gentoo
> Xorg wiki
>
> Following th
On 02/13/2017 04:11 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Setup:
>gentoo (no-X) installed into vbox vm on win 10 (64bit) host.
>
> I've gotten a solid base going but now want to setup LXDE. Gentoo LXDE
> wiki starts after you've already setup the X server so I went to Gentoo
> Xorg wiki
>
> Following th
Setup:
gentoo (no-X) installed into vbox vm on win 10 (64bit) host.
I've gotten a solid base going but now want to setup LXDE. Gentoo LXDE
wiki starts after you've already setup the X server so I went to Gentoo
Xorg wiki
Following the gentoo Xorg setup pages. I'm having some confusion
regard
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 13 Feb 2017 13:17:14 Poison BL. wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Daniel Frey wrote:
> > > On 02/12/2017 02:40 PM, Alan Grimes wrote:
> > > > So does anyone have any evidence of a current generation SSD lasting
> > > > more than
On Monday 13 Feb 2017 13:17:14 Poison BL. wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Daniel Frey wrote:
> > On 02/12/2017 02:40 PM, Alan Grimes wrote:
> > > So does anyone have any evidence of a current generation SSD lasting
> > > more than 20 days?
> >
> > I have tried various SSDs (multiple br
On 02/13/2017 10:51 AM, Remy Blank wrote:
> Daniel Frey wrote on 2017-02-13 17:34:
>> On 02/13/2017 03:34 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> Anytime you see something like root=UUID=* that is being handled by an
>>> initramfs. And of course a UUID is more reliable than a device name,
>>> since the latter
On 13.02.2017 19:20, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Johannes Rosenberger [17-02-13 19:04]:
>> On 13.02.2017 17:57, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>>
>>> Hogren [17-02-13 17:06]:
On 13/02/2017 04:42, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> got a mysterious error message this morning (still
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Remy Blank wrote:
> Daniel Frey wrote on 2017-02-13 17:34:
>> On 02/13/2017 03:34 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> Anytime you see something like root=UUID=* that is being handled by an
>>> initramfs. And of course a UUID is more reliable than a device name,
>>> since
Daniel Frey wrote on 2017-02-13 17:34:
> On 02/13/2017 03:34 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> Anytime you see something like root=UUID=* that is being handled by an
>> initramfs. And of course a UUID is more reliable than a device name,
>> since the latter can change if you add/remove a device, or maybe
Johannes Rosenberger [17-02-13 19:04]:
> On 13.02.2017 17:57, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> > Hogren [17-02-13 17:06]:
> >> On 13/02/2017 04:42, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> got a mysterious error message this morning (still building a new
> >>> root...)
> >>>
> >>> One of
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 02/12/2017 02:40 PM, Alan Grimes wrote:
> > So does anyone have any evidence of a current generation SSD lasting
> > more than 20 days?
> >
>
> I have tried various SSDs (multiple brands and generations) over the
> last maybe five years an
On 13.02.2017 17:57, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hogren [17-02-13 17:06]:
>> On 13/02/2017 04:42, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> got a mysterious error message this morning (still building a new
>>> root...)
>>>
>>> One of the updates was gnutls:
>>> It ends with:
>>> ...
>>> checki
Hogren [17-02-13 17:06]:
> On 13/02/2017 04:42, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > got a mysterious error message this morning (still building a new
> > root...)
> >
> > One of the updates was gnutls:
> > It ends with:
> > ...
> > checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config...
> > /usr/bin
Miroslav Rovis [17-02-13 17:06]:
> On 170213-04:19+0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Miroslav Rovis [17-02-12 14:03]:
> ...
> > > C'mon, give people the link to that bug that you reported, pls.! Thanks!
> > > Thanks! Thanks! Thanks!
> Sorry for this. I forgot to delete it, because I saw I was
On 02/12/2017 02:40 PM, Alan Grimes wrote:
> So does anyone have any evidence of a current generation SSD lasting
> more than 20 days?
>
I have tried various SSDs (multiple brands and generations) over the
last maybe five years and found that they're very unreliable (multiple
brands too.)
I know
On 02/13/2017 03:34 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Anytime you see something like root=UUID=* that is being handled by an
> initramfs. And of course a UUID is more reliable than a device name,
> since the latter can change if you add/remove a device, or maybe even
> if your firmware is having a bad day
Hogren [17-02-13 17:06]:
> On 13/02/2017 04:42, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > got a mysterious error message this morning (still building a new
> > root...)
> >
> > One of the updates was gnutls:
> > It ends with:
> > ...
> > checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config...
> > /usr/bin
On 170213-04:19+0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Miroslav Rovis [17-02-12 14:03]:
...
> > C'mon, give people the link to that bug that you reported, pls.! Thanks!
> > Thanks! Thanks! Thanks!
Sorry for this. I forgot to delete it, because I saw I was wrong. Wasn't
actually going to send it. Sent
Not about Tails, this message, but yes it is about GUI-less (non-dbus)
virt-manager.
About its use for installing and running a Tails' relative: Whonix.
I made a well-accepted, I believe, push for Whonix to be installable and
runnable (actually it maybe already is!) in sans-dbus systems.
Pls. if
On 13/02/2017 04:42, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> got a mysterious error message this morning (still building a new
> root...)
>
> One of the updates was gnutls:
> It ends with:
> ...
> checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config...
> /usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config
> checking pkg-con
On 13.02.2017 12:34, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 5:53 AM, marco restelli wrote:
>> Could you suggest any reference about how an initramfs can help making
>> it easier to identify the correct root filesystem? Does this
>> functionality overlap with what grub can do, or is somethin
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 5:53 AM, marco restelli wrote:
>
> Could you suggest any reference about how an initramfs can help making
> it easier to identify the correct root filesystem? Does this
> functionality overlap with what grub can do, or is something
> different?
>
The dracut references are
2017-02-10 13:35 GMT+01:00, Rich Freeman :
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 6:58 AM, marco restelli
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>I am trying to understand a bit initramfs and genkernel and I have
>> few (basic) questions.
>
>> - how does genkernel decide which modules to put in the initramfs ?
>
> I can't s
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:26:51 -0600, Dale wrote:
> >> Thanks Alexander, it pays going back to basics ... for some reason my
> >> cronie service was not running. o_O
> >>
> >> I added it to default runlevel and hopefully it will do its magic
> >> from now on.
> > I'm glad I'm not the only one pro
28 matches
Mail list logo
