I have two broadly similar web/mail desktops that behave differently -
one where the windows stay where I put them, the other does not. This is
with Palemoon and thunderbird on XFCE
On one, opening a web page from thunderbird drags palemoon from its
original desktop to the one thunderbird is on -
Yes you were absolutely right.
On 161025-14:46-0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 07:38:01PM +0200, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
> > Sorry about noticing your reply only now.
> >
> > Namely, thinking that people over at hardened ML would tell more about
> > it, I indirectly initia
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:32:17 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On 26/10/16 07:16, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> On Tuesday 25 Oct 2016 13:49:44 Andrés Becerra Sandoval wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0 was installed today as part of my upgrade and the
>>> network (static) was broken. I ha
On 26/10/16 07:16, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 Oct 2016 13:49:44 Andrés Becerra Sandoval wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0 was installed today as part of my upgrade and the
>> network (static) was broken. I had to mask the package and go back to
>> 0.4.0 to fix it!
>
> Like
On Tuesday 25 Oct 2016 13:49:44 Andrés Becerra Sandoval wrote:
> Hello,
>
> net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0 was installed today as part of my upgrade and the
> network (static) was broken. I had to mask the package and go back to
> 0.4.0 to fix it!
Likewise here.
--
Rgds
Peter
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:45:22 -0400,
Mickaël Bucas wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> [2 ]
> 2016-10-25 20:02 GMT+02:00 Miroslav Rovis :
>
> On 161025-12:02-0400, John Covici wrote:
> > Hi. I finally decided to switch the c compiler from 4.9.3 to 5.3.0
> > and ran into some strange problems. Although the ke
2016-10-25 20:02 GMT+02:00 Miroslav Rovis :
> On 161025-12:02-0400, John Covici wrote:
> > Hi. I finally decided to switch the c compiler from 4.9.3 to 5.3.0
> > and ran into some strange problems. Although the kernel compiled
> > successfully, several packages in my last update of world got
> >
Hello,
net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0 was installed today as part of my upgrade and the
network (static) was broken. I had to mask the package and go back to
0.4.0 to fix it!
--
Andrés Becerra Sandoval
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 07:38:01PM +0200, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
> Sorry about noticing your reply only now.
>
> Namely, thinking that people over at hardened ML would tell more about
> it, I indirectly initiated a thread over at hardened ML:
> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-hardened/message/09
On 161025-12:02-0400, John Covici wrote:
> Hi. I finally decided to switch the c compiler from 4.9.3 to 5.3.0
> and ran into some strange problems. Although the kernel compiled
> successfully, several packages in my last update of world got
> undefined references, one of which was mktoolnix and a
Sorry about noticing your reply only now.
Namely, thinking that people over at hardened ML would tell more about
it, I indirectly initiated a thread over at hardened ML:
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-hardened/message/09bbf3bfe59a938f11ac044e891db77e
Will surely check it! And am CC'ing harden
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 07:11:54AM +0200, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
> On 161021-11:04-0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Mick wrote:
> > > https://github.com/dirtycow/dirtycow.github.io/wiki/VulnerabilityDetails
> >
> > Not yet:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id
Hi. I finally decided to switch the c compiler from 4.9.3 to 5.3.0
and ran into some strange problems. Although the kernel compiled
successfully, several packages in my last update of world got
undefined references, one of which was mktoolnix and also mpv. Now I
did solve them by re-emerging the
On 2016-10-25, Zhu Sha Zang wrote:
> Hey dude, i have acroread installed but use okular since long time
> ago. In fact my i was in doubt if acroread still installed. I'll
> uninstall acroread, but how to recompile packages without 32-bit
> ABI? Is there a smart way or I need to change e recompil
Hello,
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Michael Mol wrote:
>On Saturday, October 22, 2016 05:28:22 AM David Haller wrote:
>> And I've IIRC used plain 'x11' (or was it 'xv'?) for a very long time.
>
>Unless things have changed massively in the last 3-4 years, you almost
>certainly were using xv without really
Hello list,
Bug 596022 reports failure to build dev-libs/libclc with the latest version
of sys-dev/clang. I've been trying to trace a problem running MilkyWay@home,
specifically with its use of the GPU, so I'm keen to make sure that I have a
properly working OpenCL system.
Is my existing libcl
16 matches
Mail list logo
