On 08/10/16 08:26, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On 08/10/16 07:43, Grant wrote:
>>> Swap usage on Linux always seems a little tricky to me. Should my
>>> goal on a web server be zero swap usage, meaning the attached graph
>>> should show no green lines at all if I'm doing it right?
>> ...
>
On 08/10/16 07:43, Grant wrote:
>> Swap usage on Linux always seems a little tricky to me. Should my
>> goal on a web server be zero swap usage, meaning the attached graph
>> should show no green lines at all if I'm doing it right?
> ...
Have you tuned swappiness?
e.g.:
vm.swappiness
>> >>> Swap usage on Linux always seems a little tricky to me. Should my
>> >>> goal on a web server be zero swap usage, meaning the attached graph
>> >>> should show no green lines at all if I'm doing it right?
>> >>
>> >> No. You want things that aren't in use to be swapped, like memory
>> >> l
On 10/07/2016 06:41 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
I've come across this nice-looking little box, which seems to come with
Ubuntu so at least all the hardware can be driven:
http://www.tinygreenpc.com/utilite-pro-32gb.html
http://utilite-computer.com/web/utilite-models
https://wiki
On 10/07/2016 06:41 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
What's the current state of Gentoo on ARM machines? I've had a poke around
the Web and found a few snippets, but not enough to tell me how deeply I'd
have to sink into bug fixing.
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:ARM
So, I was upgrading several machines, and as a habit I always run
perl-cleaner. Every machine gave me an output like so with somewhat
different package lists:
*
* It seems like perl-cleaner had to rebuild some packages.
*
* If you have just updated your major Perl version (e.g. from 5.20.2 to
5.2
Hello list,
I've come across this nice-looking little box, which seems to come with
Ubuntu so at least all the hardware can be driven:
http://www.tinygreenpc.com/utilite-pro-32gb.html
http://utilite-computer.com/web/utilite-models
What's the current state of Gentoo on ARM machin
On Friday, October 07, 2016 04:33:27 AM Grant wrote:
> >>> Swap usage on Linux always seems a little tricky to me. Should my
> >>> goal on a web server be zero swap usage, meaning the attached graph
> >>> should show no green lines at all if I'm doing it right?
> >>
> >> No. You want things that
>>> Swap usage on Linux always seems a little tricky to me. Should my
>>> goal on a web server be zero swap usage, meaning the attached graph
>>> should show no green lines at all if I'm doing it right?
>>>
>>
>> No. You want things that aren't in use to be swapped, like memory
>> leaks and such.
Yes, you're right, I hurried a bit :)
It is the `Maximum size` entry that is more suitable in your case.
Actually I have a list of apps with their specific settings, bound to
physical monitors; I don't use too many. There was a discussion here,
IIRC (or elsewhere), about binding X screens to m
Thanks Yuriy,
But those settings then apply to all windows? not just if I click
maximize?
I read up about it in the meantime, most people say not to use Xinerama,
but RandR with Twinview instead, but as far as I have tested, Xinerama
is required when you have 2 GPUs with 2 screens each.
Hi,
One of solutions known to me is the following:
* go to System Settings -> Window Behaviour -> Window Rules tab,
* Create an entry (New...) with all defaults in the `Window matching` tab,
* in the `Size&Position` tab set `Size` to the screen size and
optionally `Position` (so that your max
12 matches
Mail list logo