[gentoo-user] Re: Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1

2015-08-28 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2015-08-28, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 19:34:30 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: > >> I know it has worked in the past, and I know that recent versions of >> some distros that use Grub2 still allow you to pick a partition for >> the bootloader during the install. > > I'm instal

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Dale
walt wrote: > On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:29:20 -0400 > Rich Freeman wrote: > >> I used to think git looked really complicated until I sat through a >> one hour talk that focused mostly on the data model. Once you >> understand the data model, you understand everything. That doesn't >> take a lot of

[gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread James
Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558800 No big deal now that we can see all the recent changes to ncurses. Me; I'm just going to wait until Monday, to sync and update. > The problem was that EAPI5 (which is only a year old or so) interacts > with sl

Re: [gentoo-user] CD ripper that generates song titles?

2015-08-28 Thread Walter Dnes
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:00:54PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:42:46 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: > > > Title-artist-based filenames are harder than it looks. I'm working on > > a bash script to generate title_-_artist.flac filenames from > > audio_nn.inf data. Then I'll p

[gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread walt
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:29:20 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > I used to think git looked really complicated until I sat through a > one hour talk that focused mostly on the data model. Once you > understand the data model, you understand everything. That doesn't > take a lot of time. Does that talk

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Marc Joliet
Am Fri, 28 Aug 2015 11:23:26 -0500 schrieb Dale : > Emanuele Rusconi wrote: > > For anybody who thinks git is hard, I'll just leave here my own > > thoughts on the matter. > > > > As a user - not specifically a Gentoo user - I only need to know 3 commands: > > > > - git clone > > - git pull >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Philip Webb
150828 Rich Freeman wrote: > To really appreciate git you should understand git objects > and their references, what a commit, tree, and blob are. > Also, the whole copy-on-write concept and content-hashing concept. > I used to think git looked really complicated until I sat > through a 1 hr talk

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
Am 28.08.2015 um 15:19 schrieb walt: > I avoided yesterday's downgrade from ncurses-6.0 to ncurses-5.9-r4 > because it was obviously(?) a mistake. > > This morning I just upgraded(?) ncurses-6.0 to ncurses-6.0-r1 and > immediately after doing that, portage wants to downgrade(?) from > 6.0-r1 back t

Re: [gentoo-user] Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1

2015-08-28 Thread Jeremi Piotrowski
> > On Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:25:01 PM Michel Catudal wrote: > > > This is nonsense. I have never had a case where it would not boot when I > > have grub correctly installed on the partition. This hasn't happened to you so it obviously means it isn't possible... On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Michel

Re: [gentoo-user] Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1

2015-08-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Michel Catudal wrote: > Le 2015-08-27 23:36, Fernando Rodriguez a écrit : >> >> On Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:25:01 PM Michel Catudal wrote: >>> >>> This is nonsense. I have never had a case where it would not boot when I >> >> have grub correctly installed on the

Re: [gentoo-user] Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1

2015-08-28 Thread Terry Z.
On Aug 27, 2015 6:50 PM, wrote: > > > > > >It's not a bug, and it won't be "fixed". Installing on a partition is > >simply not supported. > > When a needed functionality is no longer working it is a bug. To have grub installing itself on the MBR when the users does

Re: [gentoo-user] Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1

2015-08-28 Thread Michel Catudal
Le 2015-08-27 23:36, Fernando Rodriguez a écrit : On Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:25:01 PM Michel Catudal wrote: This is nonsense. I have never had a case where it would not boot when I have grub correctly installed on the partition. Install grub to a partition and do something like this: su c

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 06:45:47PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >> >> I don't want to have to understand the design. I just want to be a >> user. I've got enough things competing for limited mental capacity as >> it is. > > What? I don't

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Alec Ten Harmsel
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 06:45:47PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > There are all sorts of stupidities in it - like `push' and `pull' not > being opposites That's fair. > `clone' not producing a clone, but a new repository > radically different from the original. That is not true. It is a clone, j

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 1:40 PM, wrote: > Rich Freeman wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Philip Webb wrote: >> > 150828 Rich Freeman wrote: >> > >> >> git whatchanged /usr/portage/sys-libs/ncurses > /tmp/log.txt >> > >> > Tested as user : >> > >> > 690: ~> git whatchanged /usr/por

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Alan Mackenzie
Hello, Rich. On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:41:05PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > I disagree completely. A little time spent on git is time wasted. Only > > a lot of time spent on git is useful. > I disagree with this. > > git is to VCSs

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Mick wrote: > On Friday 28 Aug 2015 18:26:12 Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Philip Webb wrote: >> > 150828 Rich Freeman wrote: >> >> git whatchanged /usr/portage/sys-libs/ncurses > /tmp/log.txt >> > >> > Tested as user : >> > 690: ~> gi

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:22 PM, James wrote: > > Surely I can mask off these updates and stay with :: > sys-libs/ncurses- 5.9-r4 > > For a while, till things settle a bit? Weird. I mask off a version > and a newer, later version appears. wtf? In your long post you didn't actually say what vers

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > I disagree completely. A little time spent on git is time wasted. Only > a lot of time spent on git is useful. I disagree with this. > git is to VCSs as assembler is to programming languages. To use either > effectively, you've got t

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread covici
Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Philip Webb wrote: > > 150828 Rich Freeman wrote: > > > >> git whatchanged /usr/portage/sys-libs/ncurses > /tmp/log.txt > > > > Tested as user : > > > > 690: ~> git whatchanged /usr/portage/sys-libs/ncurses > tmp/log.txt > > fatal: Not

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:26 AM, James wrote: > I agree with this. But since the Changlog data was a fundamental part > of Gentoo, for a very long time, and the devs wisely chose to upgrade > to git, I would think that this functionality would be provided > via git, at least by some hacks or deta

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Mick
On Friday 28 Aug 2015 18:26:12 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Philip Webb wrote: > > 150828 Rich Freeman wrote: > >> git whatchanged /usr/portage/sys-libs/ncurses > /tmp/log.txt > > > > Tested as user : > > 690: ~> git whatchanged /usr/portage/sys-libs/ncurses > tmp/log

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Emanuele Rusconi
James, maybe you skimmed over the premise "As a user - not specifically a Gentoo user"? Should I explain its implications? I was specifically addressing the complaint that you need to be a git guru just to access the changelogs. You don't. As Rich Freeman already pointed out, it's really trivial,

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Philip Webb wrote: > 150828 Rich Freeman wrote: > >> git whatchanged /usr/portage/sys-libs/ncurses > /tmp/log.txt > > Tested as user : > > 690: ~> git whatchanged /usr/portage/sys-libs/ncurses > tmp/log.txt > fatal: Not a git repository (or any parent up to mo

[gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread James
Emanuele Rusconi gmail.com> writes: > As a user - not specifically a Gentoo user - I only need to know 3 commands: > When I experimented with managing my config files with git I did a lot > of reading (I was new to VCS in general), and in the end I realized > that, although git is really powerf

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread covici
Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:24 AM, James wrote: > > > > It there an easy, automated way to have this inforation on my system(s) > > without extra keystrokes? > > Either wait for somebody to provide the old-style changelogs (some > consider this critical, some consider this

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Dale
Emanuele Rusconi wrote: > For anybody who thinks git is hard, I'll just leave here my own > thoughts on the matter. > > As a user - not specifically a Gentoo user - I only need to know 3 commands: > > - git clone > - git pull > - tig > > That's it. Tig is in dev-vcs/tig, BTW, and it's really

[gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread James
walt gmail.com> writes: > I avoided yesterday's downgrade from ncurses-6.0 to ncurses-5.9-r4 > because it was obviously(?) a mistake. I believe you. But here's what I just experienced:: I syncd a few hours ago. Now when I just went to upgrade I got this gyration of the latest ncurses debacle::

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Emanuele Rusconi
For anybody who thinks git is hard, I'll just leave here my own thoughts on the matter. As a user - not specifically a Gentoo user - I only need to know 3 commands: - git clone - git pull - tig That's it. Tig is in dev-vcs/tig, BTW, and it's really handy. When I experimented with managin

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Dale
Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:20:34AM -0400, Philip Webb wrote: >> 150828 Rich Freeman wrote: >> >>> git whatchanged /usr/portage/sys-libs/ncurses > /tmp/log.txt >> Tested as user : >> >> 690: ~> git whatchanged /usr/portage/sys-libs/ncurses > tmp/log.txt >> fatal: Not a

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Alec Ten Harmsel
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:20:34AM -0400, Philip Webb wrote: > 150828 Rich Freeman wrote: > > > git whatchanged /usr/portage/sys-libs/ncurses > /tmp/log.txt > > Tested as user : > > 690: ~> git whatchanged /usr/portage/sys-libs/ncurses > tmp/log.txt > fatal: Not a git repository (or any pare

[gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread James
Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes: > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:24 AM, James tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > > > > It there an easy, automated way to have this inforation on my system(s) > > without extra keystrokes? > > Either wait for somebody to provide the old-style changelogs (some > consider t

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Alan Mackenzie
Hello, Rich. On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:53:00AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:24 AM, James wrote: > > > > It there an easy, automated way to have this inforation on my system(s) > > without extra keystrokes? [ ] > While I do believe the ChangeLogs will show up aga

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Philip Webb
150828 Rich Freeman wrote: > git whatchanged /usr/portage/sys-libs/ncurses > /tmp/log.txt Tested as user : 690: ~> git whatchanged /usr/portage/sys-libs/ncurses > tmp/log.txt fatal: Not a git repository (or any parent up to mount point /home) Stopping at filesystem boundary (GIT_DISCOVERY_

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:24 AM, James wrote: > > It there an easy, automated way to have this inforation on my system(s) > without extra keystrokes? Either wait for somebody to provide the old-style changelogs (some consider this critical, some consider this pointless - I'll admit I tend to fal

[gentoo-user] Re: ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread James
Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes: > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:19 AM, walt gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Note that /usr/portage/sys-libs/ncurses/Changelog was last updated on > > April 6, several months ago. > > > > Rhetorical question: what is the purpose of a Changelog? > > Gentoo is no longer

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Marc Joliet wrote: > > You can try the gitweb interface, for example like this: > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/?qt=grep&q=ncurses. > A better view might be: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-libs/ncurses or if you prefer: https://

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:19 AM, walt wrote: > > Note that /usr/portage/sys-libs/ncurses/Changelog was last updated on > April 6, several months ago. > > Rhetorical question: what is the purpose of a Changelog? Gentoo is no longer maintaining the old Changelog files. The source of all change lo

Re: [gentoo-user] ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread Marc Joliet
Am Fri, 28 Aug 2015 06:19:20 -0700 schrieb walt : > I avoided yesterday's downgrade from ncurses-6.0 to ncurses-5.9-r4 > because it was obviously(?) a mistake. > > This morning I just upgraded(?) ncurses-6.0 to ncurses-6.0-r1 and > immediately after doing that, portage wants to downgrade(?) from

[gentoo-user] ncurses: reductio ad absurdum

2015-08-28 Thread walt
I avoided yesterday's downgrade from ncurses-6.0 to ncurses-5.9-r4 because it was obviously(?) a mistake. This morning I just upgraded(?) ncurses-6.0 to ncurses-6.0-r1 and immediately after doing that, portage wants to downgrade(?) from 6.0-r1 back to 6.0. This comedy of errors would be funny if

Re: [gentoo-user] curses of ncurses :(

2015-08-28 Thread Marc Joliet
Am Fri, 28 Aug 2015 11:44:29 +0200 schrieb "J. Roeleveld" : > On Thursday, August 27, 2015 07:13:58 PM Marc Joliet wrote: > > Am Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:42:07 +0200 > > > > schrieb "J. Roeleveld" : > > > I only had 1 required by set. > > > Which basically got me to remove the llvm use-flag from mesa.

[gentoo-user] OneDrive access from Linux using webdavs

2015-08-28 Thread Mick
Hi All, Apparently OneDrive, the Microsoft cloud storage, is using the webdav protocol. However, to effect authentication OneDrive uses redirection to a different URL, which breaks Linux connections to it. This page explains someone's attempts using the previous MS offering of SkyDrive: http

Re: [gentoo-user] Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1

2015-08-28 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Michel Catudal wrote: > Le 2015-08-27 15:18, Fernando Rodriguez a écrit : >> >> Who are you to tell them what they should work on? They're acting like >> FOSS developers, many of whom work for free or underpaid so they work on >> whatever the fuck they want. The pr

Re: [gentoo-user] Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1

2015-08-28 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Michel Catudal wrote: > > The language toward us is not much nicer. There is some arrogance from the > other side of the issue. > We've been fighting this for years. It is a lie to say that it cannot > install on a partition. What makes it not install is the instal

Re: [gentoo-user] Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1

2015-08-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Tom H wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: >> On Thursday 27 August 2015 08:49:13 Mike Gilbert wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Michel Catudal I've had serious problems in the past getting [grub2] to install on a >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1

2015-08-28 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Jeremi Piotrowski wrote: > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 14:19:29 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: >>> For those of us with multiple Linux installations on a disk, that's a >>> pretty big reason to stick with grub-legacy. >> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1

2015-08-28 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Fernando Rodriguez wrote: > > You do need a manager like efibootmgr unless you have a really good "bios" > menu > where you can manage your entries. Only removable media is autodetected on all > EFI boxes I've seen. I use GRUB2 because my efi firmware (like most)

Re: [gentoo-user] Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1

2015-08-28 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:50 PM, wrote: > > The maintainers of grub are basically acting like dictators much like > Microsoft. The whole point of using Linux was to have complete control of > the PC. Who those morons think they are to tell me what I should use to boot > Operating systems on my c

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1

2015-08-28 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2015-08-27, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Michel Catudal wrote: >>> >>> I've had serious problems in the past getting to to install on a partition >>> and gave up. Is that bug fixed? It insists on installing on

Re: [gentoo-user] Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1

2015-08-28 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Thursday 27 August 2015 08:49:13 Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Michel Catudal >>> >>> I've had serious problems in the past getting [grub2] to install on a >>> partition and gave up. Is that bug fixed? It insist

Re: [gentoo-user] Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1

2015-08-28 Thread Tom H
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Fernando Rodriguez wrote: > On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 6:27:14 PM Michel Catudal wrote: >> >> I've had serious problems in the past getting to to install on a partition >> and gave up. Is that bug fixed? It insists on installing on the MBR which is >> unacceptab

Re: [gentoo-user] curses of ncurses :(

2015-08-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:34:05PM +0300, gevisz wrote: >> Yes, the full system update now proceeded without blocks, however >> with "severe warnings" while compiling firefox. They are provided below. >> But the issue with ncurces blocks s

Re: [gentoo-user] curses of ncurses :(

2015-08-28 Thread Alec Ten Harmsel
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:34:05PM +0300, gevisz wrote: > Yes, the full system update now proceeded without blocks, however > with "severe warnings" while compiling firefox. They are provided below. > But the issue with ncurces blocks seem to be resolved. > > Thank you all who replied to this thre

Re: [gentoo-user] curses of ncurses :(

2015-08-28 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Thursday, August 27, 2015 07:13:58 PM Marc Joliet wrote: > Am Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:42:07 +0200 > > schrieb "J. Roeleveld" : > > I only had 1 required by set. > > Which basically got me to remove the llvm use-flag from mesa. > > > > That solved the block for me as it ended up removing "llvm" >

Re: [gentoo-user] curses of ncurses :(

2015-08-28 Thread gevisz
2015-08-28 7:03 GMT+03:00 gevisz : > 2015-08-27 20:21 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick : >> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:33:33 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> >>> Fix the real error, and all that junk on the screen goes away. No reason >>> to stop updating. >> >> And the "fix" is to resync, it's a fixed bug >> htt

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1

2015-08-28 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 19:34:30 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: > I know it has worked in the past, and I know that recent versions of > some distros that use Grub2 still allow you to pick a partition for > the bootloader during the install. I'm installing openSUSE 13.2 into a VM right now and the

Re: [gentoo-user] Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1

2015-08-28 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 22:03:44 -0400, Michel Catudal wrote: > Commenting on dictatorial behavior by some developper is not acting > like a child, it is just defending a point. All software is dictatorial, or at least oligarchic. code talks, those that write it get to say what goes in it, those that

Re: [gentoo-user] CD ripper that generates song titles?

2015-08-28 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 07:03:00 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Vinyl has always been the medium of choice for audio snobs... > And by "snob" you don't mean an insult, you mean "someone with a trained > ear who can detect superior quality", right? Those too. for those of us whose ears spent too lon