On 05/08/2015 05:28, Felix Miata wrote:
>> If we (gentoo) had a simple installation semantic, this sort of problem
>> > would most likely disappear; so the wider community could delve into other
>> > technical support issues.. YMMV.
> I get the feeling Gentoo isn't a right choice for people who
On 04/08/2015 20:30, Felix Miata wrote:
> Grant Edwards composed on 2015-08-04 17:20 (UTC):
>
>> Felix Miata wrote:
>
>>> That's right, May 2011, my first and only Gentoo installation, 32 bit on an
>>> old Athlon, which means no sse2, and kernel 2.6.37. It coexists in multiboot
>>> on one HD with
On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 17:16 -0700, walt wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 18:40:49 +0200
> Cor Legemaat wrote:
>
> > Hi:
> >
> > I want to install a mingw64 compiler with =dev-util/mingw64-
> > runtime-
> > 4.0.1, tried with the cmd:
> > > crossdev --lenv 'CFLAGS="-march=generic -mtune=generic -O2 -
On Tuesday, August 04, 2015 8:18:43 PM Cor Legemaat wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 19:56 -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Sunday, August 02, 2015 11:12:07 PM Mick wrote:
> > > On Sunday 02 Aug 2015 22:04:41 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, August 02, 2015 1:29:50 PM Mick wrote:
>
On Tuesday, August 04, 2015 5:16:09 PM walt wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 18:40:49 +0200
> Cor Legemaat wrote:
>
> > Hi:
> >
> > I want to install a mingw64 compiler with =dev-util/mingw64-runtime-
> > 4.0.1, tried with the cmd:
> > > crossdev --lenv 'CFLAGS="-march=generic -mtune=generic -O2 -pi
walt wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 08:19:37 +0200
> Franz Fellner wrote:
>
> > Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > > On Monday, August 03, 2015 6:41:22 PM walt wrote:
> > > > That line declares *hostname as a constant and then the statement
> > > > below proceeds to assign a value to the 'constant'. I
James composed on 2015-08-04 21:07 (UTC):
> Interesting choice:: how do you like your choices, Felix?
Choices are a double edged sword. The more you have, the more power you have,
but the harder to choose, especially while overwhelmed by the unfamiliar.
Your later provided ungrading old installat
Neil Bothwick composed on 2015-08-04 21:36 (UTC+0100):
> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:32:51 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>> I've yet to figure out how to get a list of
>> all installed packages akin to 'rpm -qa | sort', so I really don't know
>> what my starting configuration is.
> qlist -ICv
-bash: qli
Hi,
this morning I was trying to emerge ipset (in order to use with
sidmat) and got this instead of the executable:
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking ipset-6.20.1.tar.bz2 to
>>> /var/tmp/portage/net-firewall/ipset-6.20.1/work
>>> Source unpacked in /var/tmp/portage/net-firewall/ipset-6.20.1
Neil Bothwick composed on 2015-08-04 18:44 (UTC+0100):
> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 13:12:42 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>> 6-# emerge portage
>> This produced a longish warning:
>> !!! /etc/make.profile is not a symlink and will probably prevent most
>> merges. !!! It should point into a profile wi
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 7:56 PM, walt wrote:
> Let me give you one more example of syntax that I find unreasonable,
> and then I'll ask my *real* question, about which I hope you will have
> opinions.
>
> Okay, the statement I referred to above uses this notation:
>
> if (!link->network->hostname)
Felix Miata earthlink.net> writes:
> That's right, May 2011, my first and only Gentoo installation, 32 bit on an
> old Athlon, which means no sse2, and kernel 2.6.37. It coexists in multiboot
> on one HD with 12 installations of Fedora and openSUSE. I'd like to upgrade
> it rather than installin
Grant Edwards gmail.com> writes:
> I've tried that pathway. Many times. The "mostly unattended"
> installers all install things I don't want, pick options I don't like,
> and end up configured to do things the way the authors of the
> installer wanted to do things rather than the way I want to
On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 18:40:49 +0200
Cor Legemaat wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I want to install a mingw64 compiler with =dev-util/mingw64-runtime-
> 4.0.1, tried with the cmd:
> > crossdev --lenv 'CFLAGS="-march=generic -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe"
> > CXXFLAGS="-march=generic -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe"' --ex-g
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 20:59:47 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
> > No way on 32-bit Athlon. I have Athlon-XP. Even with distcc to
> > Core2Duo it takes about 10 days of compilation time to build all
> > stuff, I'm not counting time to fix all failures here. Well, I have
> > >3000 packages install
On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 08:19:37 +0200
Franz Fellner wrote:
> Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Monday, August 03, 2015 6:41:22 PM walt wrote:
> > > That line declares *hostname as a constant and then the statement
> > > below proceeds to assign a value to the 'constant'. I wonder how
> > > many hour
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 23:48:16 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > > 2-clone the existing partition to a larger one to be the upgrade
> > > target 3-boot the target
> > > 4-note that there exists no /etc/portage/
> >
> > How did you clone it? It appears parts are missing.
>
> In the old days mak
On 2015-08-04, James wrote:
> Felix Miata earthlink.net> writes:
>
>
>> 1-I just find upgrade processes more enjoyable than inital installations and
>> their follow-up tedium getting from defaults back to the way I like things
>> to work.
>
>
>> Now that I've seen several thread responses subs
James wrote:
> Felix Miata earthlink.net> writes:
>
>
>> 1-I just find upgrade processes more enjoyable than inital installations and
>> their follow-up tedium getting from defaults back to the way I like things
>> to work.
>
>> Now that I've seen several thread responses subsequent to this one
Felix Miata earthlink.net> writes:
> 1-I just find upgrade processes more enjoyable than inital installations and
> their follow-up tedium getting from defaults back to the way I like things
> to work.
> Now that I've seen several thread responses subsequent to this one, I'm
> leaning towar
On 2015-08-04, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 17:20:40 + (UTC) Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2015-08-04, Felix Miata wrote:
>>
>> > That's right, May 2011, my first and only Gentoo installation, 32 bit on an
>> > old Athlon, which means no sse2, and kernel 2.6.37. It coexists in
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 17:20:40 + (UTC) Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2015-08-04, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> > That's right, May 2011, my first and only Gentoo installation, 32 bit on an
> > old Athlon, which means no sse2, and kernel 2.6.37. It coexists in multiboot
> > on one HD with 12 installations o
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 18:44:47 +0100 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 13:12:42 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> > 2-clone the existing partition to a larger one to be the upgrade target
> > 3-boot the target
> > 4-note that there exists no /etc/portage/
>
> How did you clone it? It appears pa
On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:32:51 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> I've yet to figure out how to get a list of
> all installed packages akin to 'rpm -qa | sort', so I really don't know
> what my starting configuration is.
qlist -ICv
--
Neil Bothwick
Top Oxymorons Number 36: Alone together
pgpQ_PbTnP2
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015, Daniel Frey wrote:
> I found that I had to do it in little pieces at a time and portage got
> in my way constantly. I wish there was a setting to just forcibly
> compile a package and then manually deal with breakage afterward with
> something like revdep-rebuild, rather than tr
On 08/04/2015 11:30 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
> Grant Edwards composed on 2015-08-04 17:20 (UTC):
>
>> and faster. A fresh install will take a couple hours. An upgrade will
>> take somewhere between a couple days and a couple weeks.
>
> Seriously, more than a day?
>
Oh sure, it's possible.
In la
Dale composed on 2015-08-04 12:41 (UTC-0500):
> First, you are going to have a interesting few days, at least. It would
> be faster and easier to start fresh. Honestly. If you just have to or
> want to for a learning experience, cool.
> See if eselect exists. If it does, try this:
> eselect
Am 04.08.2015 um 20:30 schrieb Felix Miata:
> 1-I just find upgrade processes more enjoyable than inital installations and
> their follow-up tedium getting from defaults back to the way I like things to
> work.
been there, done that ... several times.
Loads of work but also a big chunk of learnin
On 2015-08-04, Felix Miata wrote:
> Grant Edwards composed on 2015-08-04 17:20 (UTC):
>
>> My gut feeling is that a fresh install is going to be a _lot_ easier
>
> For some "degenerate" value of easier. :-)
>
>> and faster. A fresh install will take a couple hours. An upgrade will
>> take somewhe
50 months?!?!??! that's like a fresh install Jeez, have you even
finished the burn-in testing on that?
My machine is more than 60 months old and I only recently completed the
burn-in test, (the mobo failed, wasn't giving me the PCI-E channels I
needed).
My home directory is about eleven year
Grant Edwards composed on 2015-08-04 17:20 (UTC):
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> That's right, May 2011, my first and only Gentoo installation, 32 bit on an
>> old Athlon, which means no sse2, and kernel 2.6.37. It coexists in multiboot
>> on one HD with 12 installations of Fedora and openSUSE. I'd like
On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 19:56 -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sunday, August 02, 2015 11:12:07 PM Mick wrote:
> > On Sunday 02 Aug 2015 22:04:41 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > > On Sunday, August 02, 2015 1:29:50 PM Mick wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 02 Aug 2015 01:50:21 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> >
On Tuesday 04 Aug 2015 18:20:40 Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2015-08-04, Felix Miata wrote:
> > That's right, May 2011, my first and only Gentoo installation, 32 bit on
> > an old Athlon, which means no sse2, and kernel 2.6.37. It coexists in
> > multiboot on one HD with 12 installations of Fedora an
On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 13:12:42 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> 2-clone the existing partition to a larger one to be the upgrade target
> 3-boot the target
> 4-note that there exists no /etc/portage/
How did you clone it? It appears parts are missing.
> 5-# emerge --sync
> which warned I need to
Felix Miata wrote:
> That's right, May 2011, my first and only Gentoo installation, 32 bit on an
> old Athlon, which means no sse2, and kernel 2.6.37. It coexists in multiboot
> on one HD with 12 installations of Fedora and openSUSE. I'd like to upgrade
> it rather than installing fresh, if it's do
On 2015-08-04, Felix Miata wrote:
> That's right, May 2011, my first and only Gentoo installation, 32 bit on an
> old Athlon, which means no sse2, and kernel 2.6.37. It coexists in multiboot
> on one HD with 12 installations of Fedora and openSUSE. I'd like to upgrade
> it rather than installing
That's right, May 2011, my first and only Gentoo installation, 32 bit on an
old Athlon, which means no sse2, and kernel 2.6.37. It coexists in multiboot
on one HD with 12 installations of Fedora and openSUSE. I'd like to upgrade
it rather than installing fresh, if it's doable. My initial steps have
Hi:
I wand to install a mingw64 compiler with =dev-util/mingw64-runtime-
4.0.1, tried with the cmd:
> crossdev --lenv 'CFLAGS="-march=generic -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe"
> CXXFLAGS="-march=generic -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe"' --ex-gdb -t
> x86_64-w64-mingw32 --ov-output /usr/local/portage-crossdev -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/08/15 21:19, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> Pick one:
>
> [] Cosmic Rays! [] Random quantum-level bit flipping! [] Slight
> imperfection in cannot-be-perfect disc surface! [] Random shit in
> the style of Discworld! [] Your $DEITY is messing with y
On 04/08/2015 13:15, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
>> Am Dienstag, 4. August 2015, 11:13:56 schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
>>>
>>> *** Error in `perl': double free or corruption (!prev): 0x01ed8610
>>> *** === Backtrace: =
>>> /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x7
Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 4. August 2015, 11:13:56 schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
> >
> > *** Error in `perl': double free or corruption (!prev): 0x01ed8610
> > *** === Backtrace: =
> > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x71e4b)[0x7f59bc417e4b]
> > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x7730e)[0
Am Dienstag, 4. August 2015, 11:13:56 schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com:
>
> *** Error in `perl': double free or corruption (!prev): 0x01ed8610
> *** === Backtrace: =
> /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x71e4b)[0x7f59bc417e4b]
> /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x7730e)[0x7f59bc41d30e]
> /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x77a
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 04/08/2015 12:14, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/08/2015 11:13, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> >>> Hi. After upgrading to perl 5.22.0 which was a pain -- had to remove
> >>> all those virtuals -- I am now finding that a small perl
On 04/08/2015 12:14, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> On 04/08/2015 11:13, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>>> Hi. After upgrading to perl 5.22.0 which was a pain -- had to remove
>>> all those virtuals -- I am now finding that a small perl program which
>>> connects to a m
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 04/08/2015 11:13, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > Hi. After upgrading to perl 5.22.0 which was a pain -- had to remove
> > all those virtuals -- I am now finding that a small perl program which
> > connects to a mysql database yields the following when it exits:
> >
John Campbell wrote:
> On 08/04/2015 01:35 AM, Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I went through this before and I haven't changed anything so not sure
>> why it isn't working now. I decided to test smartd to make sure that it
>> would send me a email if a drive developed a problem. I added -M test
>> t
On 04/08/2015 11:13, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Hi. After upgrading to perl 5.22.0 which was a pain -- had to remove
> all those virtuals -- I am now finding that a small perl program which
> connects to a mysql database yields the following when it exits:
>
> *** Error in `perl': double fre
Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
> Dale wrote:
>> I went through this before and I haven't changed anything so not sure
>> why it isn't working now. I decided to test smartd to make sure that it
>> would send me a email if a drive developed a problem. I added -M test
>> to the line, restarted smartd and g
On 08/04/2015 01:35 AM, Dale wrote:
Howdy,
I went through this before and I haven't changed anything so not sure
why it isn't working now. I decided to test smartd to make sure that it
would send me a email if a drive developed a problem. I added -M test
to the line, restarted smartd and got n
Dale wrote:
> I went through this before and I haven't changed anything so not sure
> why it isn't working now. I decided to test smartd to make sure that it
> would send me a email if a drive developed a problem. I added -M test
> to the line, restarted smartd and got nothing. I mean nothing bu
Hi. After upgrading to perl 5.22.0 which was a pain -- had to remove
all those virtuals -- I am now finding that a small perl program which
connects to a mysql database yields the following when it exits:
*** Error in `perl': double free or corruption (!prev): 0x01ed8610 ***
=== Back
Howdy,
I went through this before and I haven't changed anything so not sure
why it isn't working now. I decided to test smartd to make sure that it
would send me a email if a drive developed a problem. I added -M test
to the line, restarted smartd and got nothing. I mean nothing but
crickets.
52 matches
Mail list logo
