On Saturday, April 04, 2015 12:53:53 AM Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got two overlays that I added manually with PORTDIR_OVERLAY on make.conf
and
> one through layman. Just I few days ago I added a patched ebuild for x11-
> drivers/ati-drivers to satisfy some dependencies for the multil
Hi,
I got two overlays that I added manually with PORTDIR_OVERLAY on make.conf and
one through layman. Just I few days ago I added a patched ebuild for x11-
drivers/ati-drivers to satisfy some dependencies for the multilib update (it
doesn't build with the latest vanilla sources and prior to tha
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 03/04/2015 18:48, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > Grant Edwards wrote:
> >
> >> On 2015-04-03, Walter Dnes wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 02:12:40PM -0300, Francisco Ares wrote
> Hi,
>
> How does one know previously which packages will require 32
wrote:
> We should not forget that the lasers that can be found in CD drives,
> the magnetic heads in modern hard disks, and also every FET are
> working with technology that is based on quantum effects. I never
Correction: I meant TFET and not FET.
--
Regards
wabe
On Saturday, April 04, 2015 2:50:37 AM waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> One thing that I don't understand is, why the fact that gravity can be
> described by a theory of bended space-time is leading to the assumption,
> that there really exists such a "rubber cloth" like space.
I think it's because h
Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Friday, April 03, 2015 5:05:35 AM waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Boricua Siempre wrote:
> >
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > I have reading of quantum computing and I want know what operating
> > > systems are use in quantum computers. And I read quantum computers
> >
> >
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Peter Humphrey
> wrote:
> > On Friday 03 April 2015 17:11:11 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> >> That's the problem with science in general. The one thing it may
> >> never be able to answer is "why?".
> >
> > I think that's the crux of the pr
Mick wrote:
[...]
> > > This is also why I put a lot of time and energy into research
> > > before I purchase something pricey. For instance, I read in
> > > hardware forums and through reviews for many weeks before I
> > > finally decided on all components of my PC that I assembled last
> > > ye
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 03/04/2015 23:11, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > That's the problem with science in general. The one thing it may
> > never be able to answer is "why?". Take gravity as an example. We
> > got really good models for it, we can predict how it influences
> > even light with
Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Friday, April 03, 2015 5:05:35 AM waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Boricua Siempre wrote:
> >
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > I have reading of quantum computing and I want know what operating
> > > systems are use in quantum computers. And I read quantum computers
> >
> >
on Thursday 02 April 2015 18:33:06，Boricua Siempre wrote：
> From: Boricua Siempre
> To: gentoo-user
> Date: Yesterday 06:33:06
> Hello
>
> I have reading of quantum computing and I want know what operating systems
> are use in quantum computers. And I read quantum computers can use
> particols
On Friday, April 03, 2015 7:30:09 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
> Well, the quantum mechanic would say that the position of the ball was
> indeterminate until it was measured. The probability of it being in
> any particular position is given by some function that agrees with
> experiment very well.
And
On Saturday, April 04, 2015 12:02:02 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday 03 April 2015 17:11:11 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>
> No, it's stronger than that. Einstein showed us how it works. The
> consequence of having a certain concentration of mass /here/ is to distort
> space-time just /so/ in
On Saturday, April 04, 2015 1:57:19 AM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 03/04/2015 23:11, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > That's the problem with science in general. The one thing it may never be
able
> > to answer is "why?". Take gravity as an example. We got really good models
for
> > it, we can predi
On 03/04/2015 18:48, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> On 2015-04-03, Walter Dnes wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 02:12:40PM -0300, Francisco Ares wrote
Hi,
How does one know previously which packages will require 32 bit ABI ?
I have two systems
On 03/04/2015 23:11, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> That's the problem with science in general. The one thing it may never be
> able
> to answer is "why?". Take gravity as an example. We got really good models
> for
> it, we can predict how it influences even light with great accuracy but what
>
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday 03 April 2015 14:09:23 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>
> > hmmm, one of the things dependent on emul-linux thingies is the C
> > compiler! both 4.8.4 and 4.9, so if I unmerge the emul things, will I
> > still have a C compiler?
>
> What does "emerge -pv gcc" tel
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Fernando Rodriguez
wrote:
>
> There's an explanation for uncertainty that makes common sense. Let's say I
> throw you a ball, you can catch it because you take many measurements of it's
> location and your brain tries to predict it's path. But this only works
> beca
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday 03 April 2015 17:11:11 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> That's the problem with science in general. The one thing it may never be
>> able to answer is "why?".
>
> I think that's the crux of the problem with some current approaches to
On Saturday 04 April 2015 00:02:02 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Its job is to explain show "this is how the world works."
s/show//
--
Rgds
Peter.
On Friday 03 April 2015 17:11:11 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> That's the problem with science in general. The one thing it may never be
> able to answer is "why?".
I think that's the crux of the problem with some current approaches to
physics. Science does not answer the question "why?". That isn
On Friday 03 April 2015 14:09:23 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> hmmm, one of the things dependent on emul-linux thingies is the C
> compiler! both 4.8.4 and 4.9, so if I unmerge the emul things, will I
> still have a C compiler?
What does "emerge -pv gcc" tell you about emul-linux?
--
Rgds
Pete
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 12:06:30PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote
> On Friday 03 April 2015 06:58:38 Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> > I'm not convinced that anybody has proven that quantum behavior is truly
> > non-deterministic
>
> But it must be, surely, since it's probabilistic. I don't see how
> the do
On Friday, April 03, 2015 8:03:12 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> > On Friday 03 April 2015 06:58:38 Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not convinced that anybody has proven that quantum behavior is truly
> >> non-deterministic
> >
> > But it must be
On Friday 03 Apr 2015 19:09:23 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > On Friday 03 Apr 2015 17:48:38 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > > Grant Edwards wrote:
> > > > On 2015-04-03, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 02:12:40PM -0300, Francisco Ares wrote
> > > > >
> > >
Mick wrote:
> On Friday 03 Apr 2015 17:48:38 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > Grant Edwards wrote:
> > > On 2015-04-03, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 02:12:40PM -0300, Francisco Ares wrote
> > > >
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> How does one know previously which packages
On Friday 03 Apr 2015 17:48:38 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
> > On 2015-04-03, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 02:12:40PM -0300, Francisco Ares wrote
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> How does one know previously which packages will require 32 bit ABI ?
> >
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2015-04-03, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 02:12:40PM -0300, Francisco Ares wrote
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> How does one know previously which packages will require 32 bit ABI ?
> >>
> >> I have two systems (among others) to consider: one is very simple, buil
On 2015-04-03, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 02:12:40PM -0300, Francisco Ares wrote
>> Hi,
>>
>> How does one know previously which packages will require 32 bit ABI ?
>>
>> I have two systems (among others) to consider: one is very simple, built
>> using as fewer packages as possi
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday 03 April 2015 06:58:38 Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>> I'm not convinced that anybody has proven that quantum behavior is truly
>> non-deterministic
>
> But it must be, surely, since it's probabilistic. I don't see how the domain
> of prob
On Friday 03 Apr 2015 02:57:07 waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > > A wide gamut monitor is a great thing even if you don't need it for
> > > softproofing. I shot a lot of colorful photos (e.g. from bugs,
> > > blossoms and live concerts with colored limelights). They look
>
On Friday 03 April 2015 06:58:38 Rich Freeman wrote:
> I'm not convinced that anybody has proven that quantum behavior is truly
> non-deterministic
But it must be, surely, since it's probabilistic. I don't see how the domain
of probabilistic behaviour can overlap the domain of deterministic
beh
On Friday 03 April 2015 01:30:53 Walter Dnes wrote:
> Bad news for Virtualbox...
>
> ==
>
> [d531][waltdnes][~] emerge -pv virtualbox
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies...
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:30 PM, wrote:
> wrote:
>
>> with the movement of particles. It is a phenomenon that results from
>> the quantum entanglement of e.g. two electrons and has to do with the
>> nonlocality of such phenomenons. When you measure the quantum
>> attributes of one of these two e
On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 09:00:52 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> Slightly OT, but are there any tools for cleaning out old entries?
>
> I could write a script to go through package.keywords line by line and,
> for packages where the entry is =package-version.1.2.3, delete those
> lines where a newer version
150403 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 01:02:54AM +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 03:28:43AM -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
>>> if there's only 1 tab open & you kill it, it kills the whole FF job too.
>> Fortunately, we’re not left standing in the rain :
>
Stroller wrote:
> On Thu, 2 April 2015, at 5:24 pm, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> The alternative is what I have now - a 1200 line package.keywords file
>> that tells portage to build half the system 32-bit, when I could care
>> less …
> Slightly OT, but are there any tools for cleaning out old entries?
On Thu, 2 April 2015, at 5:24 pm, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> The alternative is what I have now - a 1200 line package.keywords file
> that tells portage to build half the system 32-bit, when I could care
> less …
Slightly OT, but are there any tools for cleaning out old entries?
I could write a
On Fri, 3 April 2015, at 12:25 am, Mick wrote:
>
> When people you need to communicate with on MSWindows boxes only know how to
> manage Skype-ware and you don't run a SIP proxy server yourself, your choices
> reduce somewhat.
We'll have to reincarnate Alexander Graham Bell and see if he can
On Thu, 2 April 2015, at 4:37 pm, Grant Edwards
wrote:
>
> I prefer it this way. I do not want all the nice easy-to read/edit
> configuration stuff in /etc/portage encrypted some Windows Registry
> break-alike.
What's bad about the Windows registry is that its proprietary file format is
both
On Thu, 2 April 2015, at 8:28 am, Philip Webb wrote:
> ...
> I've finished reading 'Guardian' (eg) & am doing something else,
> but the fan is working busily, wearing itself out & irritating me ;
> when I kill FF -- however I do it -- everything calms down.
> No, I'm not wasting my time complaini
On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 17:25 -0500, »Q« wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:03:15 +0300
> "Ivan T. Ivanov" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 01:37 +0200, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > This really made my day. :-)
> > >
> > > https://www.gentoo.org/news/2015/03/31/website-update.html
> >
> > Eeh,
42 matches
Mail list logo
