On Sunday, March 08, 2015 10:37:22 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> On 08.03.2015 21:21, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > Just a guess, if you move it back to the original name, does it
> > boot? Maybe there was something funny with the directory entry that
> > confused the bootloader's FAT driver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08.03.2015 21:21, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> Just a guess, if you move it back to the original name, does it
> boot? Maybe there was something funny with the directory entry that
> confused the bootloader's FAT driver and got fixed when you move
On 08.03.2015 21:17, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>> fun fact:
>>
>> compiled and installed 4.0.0-rc2 ... visible at boot time at first try
>
> I hate heisenbugs.
;-)
On Sunday, March 08, 2015 8:57:43 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> On 08.03.2015 19:10, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> > But no big problem, I can edit that conf-file whenever I install a new
> > kernel. Sure, would be nice to solve.
>
> fun fact:
>
> compiled and installed 4.0.0-rc2 ... visibl
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> On 08.03.2015 19:10, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> > But no big problem, I can edit that conf-file whenever I install a new
> > kernel. Sure, would be nice to solve.
>
> fun fact:
>
> compiled and installed 4.0.0-rc2 ... visible at
On 08.03.2015 19:10, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> But no big problem, I can edit that conf-file whenever I install a new
> kernel. Sure, would be nice to solve.
fun fact:
compiled and installed 4.0.0-rc2 ... visible at boot time at first try
;-)
On 08.03.2015 18:09, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> For the sake of testing it, I copied my 3.19.0 entry into a 3.18.9 and
> 3.19.1 entries and rebooted. Here it works fine Stefan (see attached
> image); I don't know why it doesn't with yours.
>
> I see you have some grub related files in your /boo
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:51:38 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>>>
>>> Are the ownership and mode of
>>> "e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf" the same as the
>>> two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) and is i
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> "version"?! I've never seen this and I don't use it.
>
> From [1]:
>
> title text to show in the menu
> version version string to append to the title when the title is
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:51:38 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
> > > Are the ownership and mode of
> > > "e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf" the same as the
> > > two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) a
On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 17:31:32 + (UTC), James wrote:
> I cannot seem to find that thread. I tried all sorts of keywords
> search via gmane and brute force on the archives, to no avail.
> I also could not figure out how to perform search in the recently
> open gentoo archive for the gentoo
I gene
On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:51:38 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> > Are the ownership and mode of
> > "e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf" the same as the
> > two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) and is it
> > formatted correctly?
>
> The /boot partition in UE
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
> The /boot partition in UEFI systems needs to be vfat. Permissions are not
> gonna matter that much in that.
Very true. Stupid of me...
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> moved e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf to simply
> "stefan.conf" ... then it gets displayed (and boots fine as well)
>
> maybe we should name the conf-files in a different way?
I listed my "/boot" set up in my pre
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Tom H wrote:
[ ... ]
> "version"?! I've never seen this and I don't use it.
>From [1]:
"""
The entry configuration files understand the following keywords:
title text to show in the menu
version version string to append to the title when the title
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger
wrote:
>
> On 08.03.2015 17:10, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> > On 08.03.2015 16:59, Tom H wrote:
> >
> >> Are the ownership and mode of
> >> "e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf" the same as the
> >> two others (although I'd as
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Tom H wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger
wrote:
> >
> > I compiled the latest gentoo-sources-3.19.1 with Canek's kerninst tool.
> >
> > It is configured to generate a "loader-entry" for the gummiboot
bootloader.
> >
> > That bootloader
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> On 08.03.2015 16:59, Tom H wrote:
>> Are the ownership and mode of
>> "e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf" the same as the
>> two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) and is it
>> formatted correctly?
On 08.03.2015 15:57, Leonardo Guilherme wrote:
>>
>> As the subject says: What are you using to display Flash in Firefox?
>>
>> Reason for my question is quite simple, today I am using
>> www-plugins/adobe-flash which works well for simple .swf files (where
>> gnash & lightspark fails), but I have
On 08.03.2015 17:10, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> On 08.03.2015 16:59, Tom H wrote:
>
>> Are the ownership and mode of
>> "e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf" the same as the
>> two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) and is it
>> formatted correctly?
>
> Yes, I
On 08.03.2015 16:59, Tom H wrote:
> Are the ownership and mode of
> "e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf" the same as the
> two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) and is it
> formatted correctly?
Yes, I think so:
# ls -l /boot/loader/entries/
total 2
-rwxr-xr-x
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> I compiled the latest gentoo-sources-3.19.1 with Canek's kerninst tool.
>
> It is configured to generate a "loader-entry" for the gummiboot bootloader.
>
> That bootloader is the default entry in the UEFI boot order and it works
> ..
Hmm, what is my mistake ...
I compiled the latest gentoo-sources-3.19.1 with Canek's kerninst tool.
It is configured to generate a "loader-entry" for the gummiboot bootloader.
That bootloader is the default entry in the UEFI boot order and it works
... I can boot the older kernels ... but it d
Am 08.03.2015 um 15:41 schrieb Dan Johansson:
> As the subject says: What are you using to display Flash in Firefox?
>
> Reason for my question is quite simple, today I am using
> www-plugins/adobe-flash which works well for simple .swf files (where
> gnash & lightspark fails), but I have problems
On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 15:41:56 +0100
Dan Johansson wrote:
> As the subject says: What are you using to display Flash in Firefox?
> For YT it is really not that a big problem as I can download the
> Videos using a FF AddOn - but this does not work with FB.
net-misc/youtube-dl lists facebook among
Hello
I'm using https://github.com/i-rinat/freshplayerplugin, a wrapper around
the PPAPI version bundled in chrome (I'm not sure but I think the package
www-plugis/chrome-binary-plugins has it).
It works really well nowadays, it used to crash a lot in the past.
Highly recommended.
Em dom, 8 de
As the subject says: What are you using to display Flash in Firefox?
Reason for my question is quite simple, today I am using
www-plugins/adobe-flash which works well for simple .swf files (where
gnash & lightspark fails), but I have problems displaying a lot of
Videos on Facebook & YouTube.
95%
27 matches
Mail list logo
