On 08.03.2015 18:09, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > For the sake of testing it, I copied my 3.19.0 entry into a 3.18.9 and > 3.19.1 entries and rebooted. Here it works fine Stefan (see attached > image); I don't know why it doesn't with yours. > > I see you have some grub related files in your /boot directory. I don't > have those: > > # tree -L 2 /boot > /boot > ├── db93dd0e1382198eb26650c05430b171 > │ ├── 3.18.9 > │ ├── 3.19.0 > │ └── 3.19.1 > ├── EFI > │ ├── Boot > │ ├── gummiboot > │ └── Microsoft > └── loader > ├── entries > ├── gentoo.bmp > └── loader.conf > > 10 directories, 2 files > > I don't think it has anything to do, but AFAICS, it's the only difference.
Yes, I played with grub in a second UEFI-"slot" to be able to boot from iso-images. But that stuff was there when I installed 3.19.0 back then ... so ... The UEFI-level of things won't matter, I assume. UEFI chooses and starts gummiboot, from there the two bootloaders shouldn't collide, I think. - Additionally the same new kernel installed without a problem on my thinkpad (3.19.1 ... with kerninst as well). No idea. But no big problem, I can edit that conf-file whenever I install a new kernel. Sure, would be nice to solve. thanks @all
