Hi,
Since I don't have a laptop, I'm thinking of installing Gentoo on my
USB 3 pen drive. I'll use binpkgs from my desktop so that pen drive
lives long.
Has anybody tried Samsung's F2FS? I heard it performs better than the
traditional ext4/xfs/etc on flash drives.
Also the pen drive will be used
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 18:51:22 +0100
null_ptr wrote:
> Since the last kernel upgrade
Which kernel package? From which version to which version?
> the motherboard beep of my system has gone silent.
Can you diff the dmesg as well as `lsmod` output before and after?
> Module for my sound card is r
On 21/03/14 14:41, Lee wrote:
I can't think of the name of the module, pcspkr IIRC or some such, but it
prolly isn't loaded. Modprobe can tell you if it's available & load it.
On Mar 21, 2014 12:41 PM, "Dat G" wrote:
On 21/03/14 19:54, Francesco Turco wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014, at 18:51, n
Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:41:03 -0500
> Dale wrote:
>
>> FYI. Most people don't say anything, they just blacklist you. After
>> that, you don't exist to them.
> Yes, that's up to those few; it could happen, but most respond instead.
I just read the last message from you Tom.
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Judging by replies so far, I'd guess not many at all. You can't
> possibly know how many will or will not plonk someone. In the meantime
> Dale, I think you are projecting. Chill out brother, chill out. Plenty
> stuff in the world more deserving of attention than this.
I fi
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 00:34:55 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> 2. A discussion forum. For these you do munge Reply-To: to be the list
> so all discussion happens on-list and is visible to all
>
> gentoo-user has always been the latter and all discussion always takes
> place on-list. If some doc somew
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 17:57:07 -0400
"Walter Dnes" wrote:
> How does one send email to *THIS* list, without being subscribed in
> the first place?
You can do that on sites like GMANE; similarly, given a message ID,
you can request that specific from the mailing list daemon to land in
your inbox, w
On 21/03/2014 23:57, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 02:29:48PM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote
>
>> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Procmail
>>
>> "The mailing list etiquette requires people to CC all the people
>> involved in a particular thread in replies to the mailing list, in case
>> any o
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 02:29:48PM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote
> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Procmail
>
> "The mailing list etiquette requires people to CC all the people
> involved in a particular thread in replies to the mailing list, in case
> any of them is not subscribed."
How does one send
I can't think of the name of the module, pcspkr IIRC or some such, but it
prolly isn't loaded. Modprobe can tell you if it's available & load it.
On Mar 21, 2014 12:41 PM, "Dat G" wrote:
> On 21/03/14 19:54, Francesco Turco wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014, at 18:51, null_ptr wrote:
>>
>>> Module
On 21/03/2014 20:23, Dale wrote:
> Tanstaafl wrote:
>> On 3/21/2014 7:13 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:25:18 -0400
>>> Tanstaafl wrote:
>>>
On 3/20/2014 4:14 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
Tom - please STOP CC'ing me on these emails.
I am on the list and don'
On 21/03/14 19:54, Francesco Turco wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014, at 18:51, null_ptr wrote:
Module for my sound card is running and SND_HDA_INPUT_BEEP is activated
in kernel config. Am I missing something else?
Perhaps you need CONFIG_INPUT_PCSPKR.
I tried building with that and it didn't fix i
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014, at 18:51, null_ptr wrote:
> Module for my sound card is running and SND_HDA_INPUT_BEEP is activated
> in kernel config. Am I missing something else?
Perhaps you need CONFIG_INPUT_PCSPKR.
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:41:03 -0500
Dale wrote:
> FYI. Most people don't say anything, they just blacklist you. After
> that, you don't exist to them.
Yes, that's up to those few; it could happen, but most respond instead.
> To my knowledge, the only emails I have not got when someone sent to
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 3/21/2014 7:13 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:25:18 -0400
>> Tanstaafl wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/20/2014 4:14 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>>>
>>> Tom - please STOP CC'ing me on these emails.
>>>
>>> I am on the list and don't need two copies.
>>>
>>> Use 'Reply-To-Lis
Since the last kernel upgrade the motherboard beep of my system has gone
silent.
The notebook is a HP Compaq 6710b and with an Intel 82801H Chipset (see
attached lscpi -k)
Module for my sound card is running and SND_HDA_INPUT_BEEP is activated
in kernel config. Am I missing something else?
Poison BL. wrote:
> Just my 2c as one of the others who doesn't generally reply to what,
> at face value, seemed an awful lot more combative/trolling of a tone
> than actually useful (disregard != compliance on the internet),
> fighting on the topic of 'proper use of mailing lists' when you're
> st
On 3/21/2014 7:13 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:25:18 -0400
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/20/2014 4:14 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
Tom - please STOP CC'ing me on these emails.
I am on the list and don't need two copies.
Use 'Reply-To-List' function (or equivalent - or worst case, delet
Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:10:49 -0500
> Dale wrote:
>
>> So let's get this straight. You want most everyone on this list to
>> change what they have to do to remove dups caused by you, instead of
>> you changing what you do to fix the problem?
> Everyone else is okay with it, as
J. Roeleveld wrote:
> I filter on the server, using SIEVE-scripts. Please provide the
> correct syntax I need to do this. You are the only one causing
> duplicate emails, all others on this list do NOT cause duplicate
> emails. This means the cause is on your side and the solution should
> then als
On Sat, 8 Mar 2014 10:12:13 -0500
Todd Goodman wrote:
> When you ask it to emerge dev-lang/python-exec it tries to emerge for
> all slots (I'm not sure, someone please correct me if that's not
> what's happening.)
Consider what happened when you did `sys-kernel/gentoo-sources` in the
installatio
On 21-Mar-2014 9:12 pm, "Tom Wijsman" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 07:47:47 +0530
> Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
>
> > Works perfectly. Looks like I've to downgrade to geek sources 3.13.4
> > in this case.
>
> Remember some thread about this on LKML; think this would have been
> fixed by now, does
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 18:43:27 +0800
microcai wrote:
> I'm having trouble compiling glibc. No matter I tried with binutils
> 2.23 2.24. or - live version, I got ld internal error in
> x86_64_relocation . And the same error repeated with glibc-2.18 and
> glibc-2.19 .
>
> Don't know
On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 07:47:47 +0530
Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
> Works perfectly. Looks like I've to downgrade to geek sources 3.13.4
> in this case.
Remember some thread about this on LKML; think this would have been
fixed by now, does this still happen on more recent versions?
If so, please file
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:06:12 +0100
"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> Is that one included in the Cyrus ebuild?
In Cyrus it is an actual feature, see the (first) FAQ[1] entry about
Duplicate Delivery Surpression; in imapd.conf you can do
duplicatesuppression: 1
to enable this. It might be that becaus
On Fri, March 21, 2014 14:20, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:41:54 +0100
> "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, March 21, 2014 12:59, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>> > On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:50:23 +0100
>> > "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Tom,
>> >>
>> >> Please reply to list. No need to inclu
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 03:11:25 +0100
eroen wrote:
> One would hope (mostly for their image's sake) the gnome team does
> not remove gnome-settings-daemon-2 until at least one of
> cinnamon-settings-daemon and mate-settings-daemon are included in
> gentoo proper.
+ 05 Mar 2014; Tom Wijsman
+ +fi
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:53:44 +0100
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> I'm observing on this olde Centrino laptop that emerges take much,
> much longer for certain packages than they did in the past.
There are a lot more factors that could come into play here; degrading
hardware, worse kernel, fragmenta
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 21:15:05 +
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> (media-libs/libpng-1.6.8::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
> pulled in by (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in
> this slot)
Whenever you see this, "(no parents that ...)", you'll want to be aware
that there is back
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 11:54:43 +
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 01:32:36AM +0100, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 22.02.2014 um 21:15
>
> > > What do I have to do to get this thing emerged?
>
> > > Thanks!
>
>
> > Sometimes it is helpful to increase the backtrack
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:53:22 -0300
Facundo Curti wrote:
> >
> > Debian, and Ubuntu are desktop platforms. Yes they are widely used
> > in production server environments (the slow
> > ones that is) however, our last experience with Debian squeeze as a
> > whole (ie, source tree, reliability, perfo
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:13:27 -0400
"Poison BL." wrote:
> fighting on the topic of 'proper use of mailing lists' when you're
> standing in stark contrast to the configuration of the mailing list
> you're using to do it,
Which fight? It is a short notice as to why it is being done, as well
as what
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:41:54 +0100
"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> On Fri, March 21, 2014 12:59, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:50:23 +0100
> > "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> >
> >> Tom,
> >>
> >> Please reply to list. No need to include me in the recipient list.
> >
> > Please filter duplicate
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:27:09 +
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:13:28 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>>
>> > > Use 'Reply-To-List' function (or equivalent - or worst case,
>> > > delete my direct email manually yourself) in yo
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:27:09 +
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:13:28 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>
> > > Use 'Reply-To-List' function (or equivalent - or worst case,
> > > delete my direct email manually yourself) in your email program.
> >
> > Like everyone else, use the 'Fil
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:10:49 -0500
Dale wrote:
> So let's get this straight. You want most everyone on this list to
> change what they have to do to remove dups caused by you, instead of
> you changing what you do to fix the problem?
Everyone else is okay with it, as only one in a thousand spea
On Fri, March 21, 2014 12:59, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:50:23 +0100
> "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
>
>> Tom,
>>
>> Please reply to list. No need to include me in the recipient list.
>
> Please filter duplicate mails. No need to tell each other this.
I filter on the server, using SIEVE-
Hello,
Since a few weeks I am using Gentoo Linux.
I have used Debian for something like 12 years and now decided to
switch. So far I really enjoy the learning experience with Gentoo.
Up to know I have it only installed on an old Notebook, to play around
with it.
However I use it way too seldo
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:13:28 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > Use 'Reply-To-List' function (or equivalent - or worst case, delete
> > my direct email manually yourself) in your email program.
>
> Like everyone else, use the 'Filter duplicates' function in your email
> program or procmail; these re
Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:25:18 -0400
> Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>> On 3/20/2014 4:14 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>>
>> Tom - please STOP CC'ing me on these emails.
>>
>> I am on the list and don't need two copies.
>>
>> Use 'Reply-To-List' function (or equivalent - or worst case, delete
>
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:50:23 +0100
"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> Tom,
>
> Please reply to list. No need to include me in the recipient list.
Please filter duplicate mails. No need to tell each other this.
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-h
On 21 March 2014 12:24:04 CET, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:54:55 +0100
>"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
>
>> On Sun, February 16, 2014 22:16, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
>> > wrote:
>> >> oh? I can pipe that output into cat or any
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 07:57:06 -0500
Tanstaafl wrote:
> Getting the Gentoo Council behind this idea, and providing an
> officially supported - or maybe a better term is *mandated* - process
> whereby systemd proponents can create and then maintain new systemd
> versions of any existing profiles.
>
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 23:00:43 +0400
"Yuri K. Shatroff" wrote:
> I wonder why all systemd's fancy stuff hasn't yet been integrated
> into any existing init system, because of theoretical impossibility
> or just practical uselessness?
A lot of it is being integrated in some as we speak; however, ot
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:50:07 +0100
"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> It all sounds too much like the MS Windows Event-viewer to me.
> Too many events with no usefull logging information (And I am
> referring to OS-level messages as to why default services are not
> starting)
The MS Windows Event-viewer ha
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:54:55 +0100
"J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> On Sun, February 16, 2014 22:16, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
> > wrote:
> >> oh? I can pipe that output into cat or any any daemon I like?
> >> Doesn't look like so.
> >
> > But
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:32:28 +
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> A login daemon should be started by the init system, not be an
> integral part of it. What happens when logind no longer fulfils
> developers needs, as is the case with ConsoleKit now, how can it be
> replaced with an improved service when
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:25:18 -0400
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 3/20/2014 4:14 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>
> Tom - please STOP CC'ing me on these emails.
>
> I am on the list and don't need two copies.
>
> Use 'Reply-To-List' function (or equivalent - or worst case, delete
> my direct email manually you
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:23:05 -0400
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 3/20/2014 4:00 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:53:51 +0400
> > Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> >> OpenRC is default in Gentoo now, and it is my best hope it will be.
>
> > Do you have a source that backs up this claim?
>
> A
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:37:20 -0400
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 3/20/2014 5:48 PM, »Q« wrote:
> > Why should Gentoo have a default?
>
> Defaults are always a good idea - as long as they are reasonable and
> rational.
Depends on how you think about it; one could claim a DE as default as
reasonable an
On 3/20/2014 5:48 PM, »Q« wrote:
Why should Gentoo have a default?
Defaults are always a good idea - as long as they are reasonable and
rational.
ISTM the only good reason is that not having a default would make the
documentation a lot more complicated.
Documentation, *and* the install p
Am 20.03.2014 11:24, schrieb Tom Wijsman:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 11:39:58 +0400
> Gleb Klochkov wrote:
>
>> Tom, thank you for your answer.
>>
>> $ dmesg >> http://bpaste.net/show/187533/
> There this can be seen:
>
> [ 18.074574] [drm] Wrong MCH_SSKPD value: 0x16040307
> [ 18.074575] [
140320 James wrote:
> I often go to /usr/portage/
> and browse the packages under a given category,
> for example /usr/portage/media-sound .
> Rather that looking at the packages one at a time,
> It be nice to list all the packages in a (dir) group
> and the single line description.
My notes say
140320 john wrote:
> After recently reading about Windigo,
> I am quesstioning how good my security is on my Gentoo box.
> I am only a desktop user with iptables and clamav installed
> and occasionally running chkrootkit.
> Would you recommend any other forms of security
> -- snort, selinux, harden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/03/14 17:44, Ján Zahornadský wrote:
Indeed, the smaller the surface area, the smaller the target (the
fewer things running, the fewer things can be exploited).
For an average desktop environment, doing what you're already doing, I
think, wou
55 matches
Mail list logo
