On Fri, March 21, 2014 12:59, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:50:23 +0100 > "J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org> wrote: > >> Tom, >> >> Please reply to list. No need to include me in the recipient list. > > Please filter duplicate mails. No need to tell each other this.
I filter on the server, using SIEVE-scripts. Please provide the correct syntax I need to do this. You are the only one causing duplicate emails, all others on this list do NOT cause duplicate emails. This means the cause is on your side and the solution should then also be on your side. > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html I disagree with those. Seen those arguments before along with the opposite versions. Mailing lists where a reply does not work are broken. Mailing lists where I always end up with duplicate replies don't stay used by myself for very long. >> Also, no need to reopen a closed mail > > A thread can't be closed by its individuals; you can choose to not > reply, but that doesn't withhold the ability for others to reply. True, but a mail-thread that hasn't had a reply for over a month is usually considered closed. It's nice that you decide to catch up with your emails, but please then take care not to flood inboxes as well. -- Joost
