On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 03:28:22PM +0100, Elias Diem wrote
> Is anybody else here using uzbl and can help me with the
> problem?
>
> * www-client/uzbl
> Latest version available: 2011.04.12
> Latest version installed: 2011.04.12
>
> I run amd64.
Hi;
I run the git version of uzb
On Sat, Dec 07 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2013 12:40 PM, "walt" wrote:
>>
>> Just updated my stable amd64 machine to use systemd and all is working
>> okay except for the lvm.service.
>>
>> The lvm.service starts with no errors, but OTOH it finds no physical or
>> logical volume
Hi, Tom.
Thanks for such a rapid reply.
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 10:50:16PM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 21:26:08 +
> Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > My evidence for this failure comes from "$ rc config show -all": every
> > visible service is marked as being "[stopped]". If I t
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 21:26:08 +
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> My evidence for this failure comes from "$ rc config show -all": every
> visible service is marked as being "[stopped]". If I try "$ rc config
> start ", I get told something like "service is already
> starting". The same happens with "$
Hi, Gentoo!
I finally built 3.10.17 a couple of weeks back, and have spent many
hours, fruitlessly, trying to get a handle on the following problem.
I boot with 3.10.17 and the services fail to start. Everything is fine
with 3.8.13. My system is an amd-64 stable, with /usr on the root
partition
On Dec 7, 2013 12:40 PM, "walt" wrote:
>
> Just updated my stable amd64 machine to use systemd and all is working
> okay except for the lvm.service.
>
> The lvm.service starts with no errors, but OTOH it finds no physical or
> logical volumes. I suspect this happens because the drive using lvm2
>
Hi,
after the recent stabilization of gnome3 I want to migrate away from the
whole gnome-toolchain. Maybe I will migrate to systemd in some months, if
everything has settled down but as for now I don't think I gain anything
from it.
The thing is, on my laptop I used to use the gnome-power-manager
Just updated my stable amd64 machine to use systemd and all is working
okay except for the lvm.service.
The lvm.service starts with no errors, but OTOH it finds no physical or
logical volumes. I suspect this happens because the drive using lvm2
is in a usb3 external dock instead of attached to th
On Sat, 07 Dec 2013 12:32:12 -0500
gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06 2013, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>
> > A stable ebuild being broken is concerning, the above feels like a
> > bug to me; can you file a bug and attach the complete build log and
> > comment with the output of `emerge --info`? Tha
On Fri, Dec 06 2013, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 09:45:17 -0500
> gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
>
>> Cannot open src/hostname/org.freedesktop.hostname1.policy: No such
>> file or directory
>
> A stable ebuild being broken is concerning, the above feels like a bug
> to me; can you file a bug
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 11:47:41 +
Mick wrote:
> tomorrow I could end up *having* to install
> systemd or whatever RHL and their developers have deemed appropriate
> for your average desktop system.
They don't have control over the dependencies in packages and
distributions they don't own though
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 12:46:34 +0100
Róbert Čerňanský wrote:
> That is actually what I have asked just a few days ago in thread
> "Systemd as drop-in replacement for udev?" and here I have another
> answer. :-)
`grep systemd /usr/portage/virtual/udev/udev-208.ebuild` confirms from
the Portage view
On Saturday 07 Dec 2013 11:27:50 Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 11:03:00 +
>
> Mick wrote:
> > It used to be the case that setting -gnome globally would be
> > sufficient, without having to manually mask packages. I had
> > gstreamer in pidgin to be able to get sound. I'm guessing
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 09:40:13 +0100
Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 07:32:09 +0100
> meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> > [blocks B ] sys-fs/udev ("sys-fs/udev" is blocking
> > sys-apps/systemd-208-r2)
>
> Pick one or the other; you can use sys-apps/systemd without running or
> migrating
On Saturday 07 Dec 2013 11:03:00 Mick wrote:
> Is it the case that now one has to install gnome-base to be able to use
> gstreamer?
Not here, no. I have gstreamer but no gnome-base on this KDE box (not ~amd64).
In fact, "eix -I gnome" returns only polkit-gnome. I see that's only there
because I
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 11:03:00 +
Mick wrote:
> It used to be the case that setting -gnome globally would be
> sufficient, without having to manually mask packages. I had
> gstreamer in pidgin to be able to get sound. I'm guessing that I
> need gstreamer in pidgin to be able to set up a voice c
On Sat, 07 Dec 2013 01:43:37 -0500
Jonathan Callen wrote:
> Udev as installed by sys-fs/udev is *exactly* the same as udev
> installed by sys-apps/systemd, except that the latter installs more
> files. It is very much possible to switch to systemd as your udev
> provider without using the rest o
On Saturday 07 Dec 2013 10:31:38 you wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 10:16:43 +
>
> Mick wrote:
> > Why is gnome-base suddenly necessary on my system? Is it
> > media-plugins/gst- plugins-gconf that wants to pull it in this
> > morning, when it hadn't done so before?
> >
> > This is what I see,
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 10:48:21 +
Mick wrote:
> lib/edje/.libs/libedje.so: undefined reference to `eet_mmap'
This sounds like a bug to me, can you file a bug at
https://bugs.gentoo.org and attach the complete build log as well as
comment with the output of `emerge --info`? Thank you in advance.
Any idea what causes this error:
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -std=gnu99 -
O2 -march=pentium3 -fomit-frame-pointer -msse -mmmx -pipe -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-
needed -o bin/edje/edje_cc bin/edje/bin_edje_edje_cc-edje_cc.o
bin/edje/bin_edje_edje_cc-edje_cc_out.o bin/e
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 10:16:43 +
Mick wrote:
> Why is gnome-base suddenly necessary on my system? Is it
> media-plugins/gst- plugins-gconf that wants to pull it in this
> morning, when it hadn't done so before?
>
> This is what I see, but I also include the full enchilada below in
> case it is
Why is gnome-base suddenly necessary on my system? Is it media-plugins/gst-
plugins-gconf that wants to pull it in this morning, when it hadn't done so
before?
This is what I see, but I also include the full enchilada below in case it is
more informative:
[nomerge ] media-plugins/gst-pl
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 07:32:09 +0100
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> [blocks B ] sys-fs/udev ("sys-fs/udev" is blocking
> sys-apps/systemd-208-r2)
Pick one or the other; you can use sys-apps/systemd without running or
migrating to it if you want just the sys-fs/udev portion of it.
> sys-apps/tcp-
23 matches
Mail list logo
