On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 05:05:06PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote
> On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 09:07:00 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
> > Or, as an alternative, *how* to switch to eudev (their web page does
> > *not* have simple/precise instructions on how to switch, only a
> > description of what it is) - ie
Am 03.04.2013 13:16, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> On Wed, April 3, 2013 11:09, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 05:46:07 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>
Do guinea pigs work better or worse than tribbles at calming you?
>>> Tribbles don't keep people calm indefinitely. At some point they al
130404 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> A true GentooWay installer would be any installer of your own choice
> that launches the shell of your chosing, accepts any stage3 tarball that
> you want and gotten from anywhere you choose to get it, and unpacked any
> place you feel like putting it. It will then run
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:38:28 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> > Have you read the news item?
>>
>> Yes. I found it rather confusing.
>>
>> It refers to a "new format" for rules, but the examples use the exact
>> same format as the old rules.
>
> Poor choice of term
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 11:28:10PM +0100, Mick wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 Apr 2013 20:46:37 Bruce Hill wrote:
>
> > Therefore, all's well that's still working! And AFAIR, on at least 2 of
> > those machines, the 70-persistent-net.rules was never something I did
> > manually.
>
> Right, it used to b
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 09:07:00 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Not to mention the fact that this final/current seemingly complete
> document was way, way too late for the many people who ended up with
> totally broken systems, and *that* is what caused all of the 'hysteria
> and mob-think' you so conde
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:38:28 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
> > Have you read the news item?
>
> Yes. I found it rather confusing.
>
> It refers to a "new format" for rules, but the examples use the exact
> same format as the old rules.
Poor choice of terminology there, the format is the s
On 04/04/2013 10:59 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2013-04-03, Mick wrote:
>> On Wednesday 03 Apr 2013 20:46:37 Bruce Hill wrote:
>>
>>> Therefore, all's well that's still working! And AFAIR, on at least 2 of
>>> those machines, the 70-persistent-net.rules was never something I did
>>> manually.
>>
On 2013-04-03, Mick wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 Apr 2013 20:46:37 Bruce Hill wrote:
>
>> Therefore, all's well that's still working! And AFAIR, on at least 2 of
>> those machines, the 70-persistent-net.rules was never something I did
>> manually.
>
> Right, it used to be auto-generated by udev script
在 Wed, 03 Apr 2013 22:43:53 -0900，Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
写道:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 12:41:26AM -0900, Jackie wrote:
Hello all,I was trying to reinstall gentoo on my PC and when I was
emerging gentoo-sources-3.8.5,sys-fs/udev-200 was required.However,after
installation of gentoo-sources,coml
2013/4/4 Felix Kuperjans
> Hi João,
>
> João Matos:
> > Hi list.
> >
> > I decided to install a virtual server for testing some stuff, but I
> > couldn't configure eth0 as usual. The system complain it doesn't
> > exist. After compiling the kernel hundreds of times, I supposed the
> > problem wa
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Francisco Ares wrote:
> Hello All
>
> Issuing a "fuser -m [mount-point]" shows that kded4 keeps using the flash
> drive device, so I am not allowed to umount it.
>
> Any hints on how to solve this? The most relevant search result is in
> http://forum.kde.org/viewt
On 04/04/2013 15:27, João Matos wrote:
> Hi list.
>
> I decided to install a virtual server for testing some stuff, but I
> couldn't configure eth0 as usual. The system complain it doesn't exist.
> After compiling the kernel hundreds of times, I supposed the problem
> wasn't my kernel configurati
Hi João,
João Matos:
> Hi list.
>
> I decided to install a virtual server for testing some stuff, but I
> couldn't configure eth0 as usual. The system complain it doesn't
> exist. After compiling the kernel hundreds of times, I supposed the
> problem wasn't my kernel configuration then installed
Hi list.
I decided to install a virtual server for testing some stuff, but I
couldn't configure eth0 as usual. The system complain it doesn't exist.
After compiling the kernel hundreds of times, I supposed the problem
wasn't my kernel configuration then installed dhcpcd.
For my surprise, I got a
On 2013-04-04 5:13 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I gets so bad that people are starting to make shit up to be worried
about, instead of just reading the simple document that is right in
front of their eyes that already fully and completely answers the
question at hand
But Alan, haven't you read
I
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 04/04/2013 10:15, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
> > Well, an installer certainly would find its users. But none is perfect,
> > and writing another (imperfect) one exclusively for Gentoo is sort of
> > wasting time. A "true" Gentoo way IMO wo
On 03/04/13 at 03:47pm, Francisco Ares wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am sorry, I think I did not make myself clear.
>
> The only process using the flash drive is "kded4". The link I sent was the
> closest search result about the same issue (not able to umount a flash
> drive).
>
> Thanks
> Francisco
Well
On 04/04/2013 10:10, Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
> Sort of the same here, except that I use lan0 instead of eth0, because
> once in a while I use broadcom's wireless drivers instead of the kernel
> drivers, and the former assign an ethX name.
>
> Sadly, I still get some problems after resuming
On 04/04/2013 10:15, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
> Well, an installer certainly would find its users. But none is perfect,
> and writing another (imperfect) one exclusively for Gentoo is sort of
> wasting time. A "true" Gentoo way IMO would be a selection of installers
> on the installation medium ;-)
On 03.04.2013 23:36, Alan McKinnon wrote:
The reason I say Gentoo shouldn't worry about installers is that the
typical person installing Gentoo already knows about chroots. Someone
who doesn't is unlikely to consider Gentoo at all (unless they are
looking to rice, but we long since moved past th
On 2013-04-02, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 21:13, Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Peter Humphrey
>> wrote:
>>> The most important para to me in the news item was: "The feature can also be
>>> completely disabled using net.ifnames=0 on the kernel command line." I j
On 2013-04-01, Michael Mol wrote:
>
> On 04/01/2013 03:26 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
>> You know that both udev and eudev have exactly the same issue with
>> separate /usr right?
>> The problem there isn't in the udev code, but it has to do with what is
>> happening in rules that other packages in
Stroller, i didn't knew what a chroot was back then either, but i've found
in gentoo a vdery good teacher. If you are willing to learn, with gentoo
you can go as deeper as you want and learn a lot. Most of the linux
knowledge i have i owe it to gentoo.
As far as i understand know, chroot is pretty
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 12:41:26AM -0900, Jackie wrote:
> Hello all,I was trying to reinstall gentoo on my PC and when I was
> emerging gentoo-sources-3.8.5,sys-fs/udev-200 was required.However,after
> installation of gentoo-sources,comlpilation of udev failed and there is no
> output of erro
25 matches
Mail list logo
