On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 11:28:10PM +0100, Mick wrote: > On Wednesday 03 Apr 2013 20:46:37 Bruce Hill wrote: > > > Therefore, all's well that's still working! And AFAIR, on at least 2 of > > those machines, the 70-persistent-net.rules was never something I did > > manually. > > Right, it used to be auto-generated by udev scripts. With udev-200 you are > meant to remove it along with any other files from your /etc/udev/rules.d/ > > If you left them there and their syntax is still valid, then udev will parse > them and do as is told. > > -- > Regards, > Mick
Why are we "meant to remove it"? Why would we remove them, since they're working? My kernel(s) all have eth* and none of that weirdness others reported. Thanks, Bruce -- Happy Penguin Computers >') 126 Fenco Drive ( \ Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ supp...@happypenguincomputers.com 662-269-2706 662-205-6424 http://happypenguincomputers.com/ A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting
