walt wrote:
> On 01/24/2012 01:14 PM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> > Hi. I am upgrading gnome to gnome3 and I find that at least
> > gnome-control-center wants pulseaudio, but I hate pulseaudio and, if
> > possible, don't want to install it at all. I did configure
> > package.provided to not
On 01/24/2012 01:14 PM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Hi. I am upgrading gnome to gnome3 and I find that at least
> gnome-control-center wants pulseaudio, but I hate pulseaudio and, if
> possible, don't want to install it at all. I did configure
> package.provided to not compile, but gnome-contr
Hi. I am upgrading gnome to gnome3 and I find that at least
gnome-control-center wants pulseaudio, but I hate pulseaudio and, if
possible, don't want to install it at all. I did configure
package.provided to not compile, but gnome-control-center seems to
require it. Anyway to get around this?
T
On Tuesday 24 Jan 2012 17:08:43 fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
> I know, in general, what proxies do -- caching, filtering, and
> bypassing firewalls. I have even written a couple of very special
> purpose proxies. Now I need one for work, and don't realy want to
> write another custom special purpose
I know, in general, what proxies do -- caching, filtering, and
bypassing firewalls. I have even written a couple of very special
purpose proxies. Now I need one for work, and don't realy want to
write another custom special purpose when it seems there must be a
canned one which can do the job.
W
Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012, 00:25:47 schrieb Philip Webb:
> Thanks for the 2 responses, which are useful.
>
> For export, 3.5.0.1 does the job without any problem,
> so it was something wrong with 3.5.0.0, which got pulled very quickly.
>
> For import, I was expecting something more complicat
walt gmail.com> writes:
> Now's my chance to save the tapes to a newer format. (Until the
> new format becomes obsolete in another year or two.)
>
> Transferring the audio is easy even for old non-multi-media me,
> but how to get the video off the tape and into the computer? Do
> I need a new
On Tuesday 24 Jan 2012 15:02, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 23 Jan 2012 23:34:00 Mervyn Hammer wrote:
>> Thanks for your replies.
>>
>>> Am 23.01.2012 23:03, schrieb walt:
Very strange indeed. I just installed both packages and I have no
libmix.so.0 either, yet everything works.
No i
On Monday 23 Jan 2012 23:34:00 Mervyn Hammer wrote:
> Thanks for your replies.
>
> > Am 23.01.2012 23:03, schrieb walt:
> > > Very strange indeed. I just installed both packages and I have no
> > > libmix.so.0 either, yet everything works.
> > >
> > > No idea what's causing your problem, but I a
On Jan 24, 2012 4:40 PM, "András Csányi" wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to ask what should I do in this case? I would like to
> make a new kernel using genkernel but there is no 1.8.1 version of
> busybox and it's not available in portage. To be honest I don't want
> to do a new kernel by h
Dear All,
I would like to ask what should I do in this case? I would like to
make a new kernel using genkernel but there is no 1.8.1 version of
busybox and it's not available in portage. To be honest I don't want
to do a new kernel by hand despite the fact it would be a few
commands.
Thanks for a
11 matches
Mail list logo
