On Monday 23 Jan 2012 23:34:00 Mervyn Hammer wrote: > Thanks for your replies. > > > Am 23.01.2012 23:03, schrieb walt: > > > Very strange indeed. I just installed both packages and I have no > > > libmix.so.0 either, yet everything works. > > > > > > No idea what's causing your problem, but I agree it's a problem I'd > > > want to solve. I'd try running ldconfig -p and lddtree /usr/bin/nc > > > to see where the .0 is coming from. (lddtree is from pax-utils). > > For completeness: > > (for dev-libs/libmix-2.05-r5 after symlink created) > > ldconfig -p | grep libmix = > > libmix.so.0 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libmix.so.0 > libmix++.so.0 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libmix++.so.0 > > and output from lddtree /usr/bin/nc = > > nc => /usr/bin/nc (interpreter => /lib/ld-linux.so.2) > libmix.so.0 => /usr/lib/libmix.so.0 > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 > > * Felix Kuperjans <fe...@desaster-games.com> [2012-01-23 23:13:26 +0100]: > > I ran into this problem some time ago, it seems the ebuild > > dev-libs/libmix-2.05-r5 is broken. It does no longer create a symlink > > from libmix.so.0 to libmix.so. > > Though it worked with the symlink, as you suggested, I upgraded libmix > anyway.
Hmm ... strange. I have dev-libs/libmix-2.05-r5 and I also have the symlink: $ ls -la /usr/lib64/libmix* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5752 Mar 25 2011 /usr/lib64/libmix++.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Mar 25 2011 /usr/lib64/libmix++.so.0 -> libmix++.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 98352 Mar 25 2011 /usr/lib64/libmix.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Mar 25 2011 /usr/lib64/libmix.so.0 -> libmix.so -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
