Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Dale wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am Donnerstag 29 September 2011, 01:27:27 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 17:52:24 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
I am naturally grumpy.
Wonder what I am? Then again, does it mat
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 15:57, Jan Steffens wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Arun Raghavan
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 02:56 -0300, Spidey / Claudio wrote:
> > [...]
> >> My bad, hadn't synced yet before that post. I'll test it throughly and
> >> tomorrow (today, 29/09) I'll give
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Dale wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag 29 September 2011, 01:27:27 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
>>> On Tuesday 27 September 2011 17:52:24 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> I am naturally grumpy.
>>
>
> Wonder what I am? Then again, does it matter? Th
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am Donnerstag 29 September 2011, 01:27:27 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 17:52:24 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
which is your own fucking fault.
Get your drivers into the kernel. Problem solved.
Does gratuitous obscenity come naturally to you, o
On 09/29/2011 09:42 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
>
> Several days ago I did raise my concern on this behavior when I noticed
> that emerge wants to downgrade my hardened-sources. Although I'm using
> ~amd64, I draw the line on 3.0 and specified ~2.6.39.
>
> Now I'm forced to maintain a private/pers
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:51, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Tamer Higazi
> wrote:
> > Am 29.09.2011 01:27, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Tamer Higazi
> wrote:
> >>> Am 29.09.2011 00:03, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> On
On Sep 30, 2011 1:10 AM, "Michael Mol" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hi, Gentoo!
> >
> > Why are there so many packages whose versions never become stable? By
> > "many", I mean here at least two. :-)
> >
> > These are the kernel and Firefox.
> >
> > My k
>> Be careful though, being grumpy is dangerously seductive.
>
> It is? You could have fooled me
Sorry - I meant being grumpy is seductive for the grumpy person. Its
pretty much the opposite for the people they interact with, as you
imply.
On Sep 30, 2011 2:45 AM, "Niccolò Belli" wrote:
>
> Il 29/09/2011 21:38, Michael Mol ha scritto:
>
>> Upstream underwent a massive shift in their release pattern which
>> results in a great deal more work for anyone who needs to vet the
>> software before it gets redistributed.
>
>
> No, they don'
On Friday 30 September 2011 01:45:39 Adam Carter wrote:
> Be careful though, being grumpy is dangerously seductive.
It is? You could have fooled me
--
Rgds
Peter Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23
On 09/29/11 16:07, Matthew Finkel wrote:
>
> $ cat /usr/bin/kvm
> #!/bin/sh
> exec /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 --enable-kvm "$@"
>
>
> But I was under the impression you can only use -enable-kvm if you have
> KVM built into the kernel/load the module.
>
It will spit out a warni
>> > which is your own fucking fault.
>> >
>> > Get your drivers into the kernel. Problem solved.
>>
>> Does gratuitous obscenity come naturally to you, or do you have to work at
>> it?
>
> I am naturally grumpy.
Yeah we've noticed ;) I like reading your posts because you know
stuff, and I like th
>> How good is Linux support with those? If bad, what other mobos support
>> 1075T and Linux support is awesome?
>
> most probably they will just work.
I've just built a machine based on GA-880-GM-UD2H that I bought a
couple of years ago, and it works well. It supports 1090T and 1100T,
which you s
fra...@gmail.com writes:
> When I move the mouse down to the task bar area, the mouse pointer
> changes from the remote machine native shape to the local desktop shape,
> showing visually the fact that I can not click on any task bar icons.
Does the same happen when using rdesktop?
Wonko
Hi,
I am running krdc to use some MSWindows programs in another computer. As
some of them are pretty CPU intensive, I prefer to do it this way rather
than using a virtual machine. Besides this, I did not want to bother to
install everything again.
When I move the mouse down to the task ba
Il 29/09/2011 00:04, Mark Knecht ha scritto:
For the first time in a couple of years I had a total hard hang
You are lucky, it happened tons of times to me.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 09/28/2011 10:42 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> >
> > Doh!
> >
> > I had forgotten there was a seperate kvm-enabled build of Qemu. I'll
> > have to give that a try.
> >
>
> You can use qemu-kvm whether or not you have a kernel/CPU with KVM
Il 29/09/2011 21:38, Michael Mol ha scritto:
Upstream underwent a massive shift in their release pattern which
results in a great deal more work for anyone who needs to vet the
software before it gets redistributed.
No, they don't: there will be long term support releases suitable for
distros.
2011/9/29 Niccolò Belli :
> Il 29/09/2011 20:56, Michael Orlitzky ha scritto:
>>
>> Firefox (>= 4) and the kernel (>= 3) are special cases, already
>> explained by Michael Mol.
>
> I know of the problems with 3.x kernels, but what's the problem with
> firefox?
Upstream underwent a massive shift in
On Thursday 29 Sep 2011 18:35:13 Spidey / Claudio wrote:
> Deleting files were slow as hell too.
Hmm ... no, not here. Reiser4 pretty much blew the doors off anything else I
have ever used in Linux land. (I have not tried btrfs yet).
I can't even blame reiser4 for the 'temperamental' behaviour
Il 29/09/2011 20:56, Michael Orlitzky ha scritto:
Firefox (>= 4) and the kernel (>= 3) are special cases, already
explained by Michael Mol.
I know of the problems with 3.x kernels, but what's the problem with
firefox?
On 09/29/2011 01:55 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Gentoo!
>
> Why are there so many packages whose versions never become stable? By
> "many", I mean here at least two. :-)
>
> These are the kernel and Firefox.
>
> My kernel is currently 2.6.39-gentoo-r3, built on July 18. By examining
> ebu
James wrote:
Nilesh Govindarajan nileshgr.com> writes:
These two motherboards came to my notice which support the above
processor: Gigabyte 880GM - GA 880GM-USB3L& 880GM-USB3
Dunno.
How good is Linux support with those? If bad, what other mobos support
1075T and Linux support is awesome?
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Gentoo!
>
> Why are there so many packages whose versions never become stable? By
> "many", I mean here at least two. :-)
>
> These are the kernel and Firefox.
>
> My kernel is currently 2.6.39-gentoo-r3, built on July 18. By examinin
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:57:25 +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote about
[gentoo-user] Strange GCC behavior:
> Default function arguments in C are specified like this:
>
> int func(int a = 10) {} // just a dummy function
>
> Now I save that in a file called foo.c
>
> The above piece of code is valid
Hi, Gentoo!
Why are there so many packages whose versions never become stable? By
"many", I mean here at least two. :-)
These are the kernel and Firefox.
My kernel is currently 2.6.39-gentoo-r3, built on July 18. By examining
ebuilds, I now see that the ~amd64 is already up to 3.0.4-r1. I've
On Thu 29 Sep 2011 11:13:54 PM IST, Todd Goodman wrote:
> * Nilesh Govindarajan [110929 13:33]:
>> Default function arguments in C are specified like this:
>>
>> int func(int a = 10) {} // just a dummy function
>
> No they're not. C doesn't have default function arguments.
>
>>
>> Now I save that
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Todd Goodman wrote:
> * Nilesh Govindarajan [110929 13:33]:
>> Default function arguments in C are specified like this:
>>
>> int func(int a = 10) {} // just a dummy function
>
> No they're not. C doesn't have default function arguments.
That's another problem.
On Thu 29 Sep 2011 11:10:00 PM IST, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan
> wrote:
>> Default function arguments in C are specified like this:
>>
>> int func(int a = 10) {} // just a dummy function
>>
>> Now I save that in a file called foo.c
>>
>> The above pie
* Nilesh Govindarajan [110929 13:33]:
> Default function arguments in C are specified like this:
>
> int func(int a = 10) {} // just a dummy function
No they're not. C doesn't have default function arguments.
>
> Now I save that in a file called foo.c
>
> The above piece of code is valid in
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan
wrote:
> Default function arguments in C are specified like this:
>
> int func(int a = 10) {} // just a dummy function
>
> Now I save that in a file called foo.c
>
> The above piece of code is valid in C as well as C++
>
> Now see this:
>
> nile
Deleting files were slow as hell too.
Claudio Roberto França Pereira (a.k.a. Spidey)
hardMOB - HTForum - @spideybr
Engenharia de Computação - UFES 2006/1
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 08:39, Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 29 Sep 2011 04:40:15 Spidey / Claudio wrote:
>> I have lived through some lock ups
Default function arguments in C are specified like this:
int func(int a = 10) {} // just a dummy function
Now I save that in a file called foo.c
The above piece of code is valid in C as well as C++
Now see this:
nilesh@Linux ~ $ cat /tmp/foo.c
int func(int a = 1) {}
nilesh@Linux ~ $ gcc /tmp/f
On 28 September 2011 15:12, Alex Sla <4k3...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Alex Sla <4k3...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Todd Goodman wrote:
>>
>>> * Florian Philipp [110928 16:05]:
>>> > Am 28.09.2011 21:39, schrieb Alex Sl
On 09/29/2011 04:13 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:23:30 -0700, Grant wrote:
>
>> For some reason I thought SFTP would provide access control but now
>> I'm thinking it's just like SSH in that access control is based on
>> file ownership and permissions? If that's the case, can
On 09/28/2011 10:42 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> Doh!
>
> I had forgotten there was a seperate kvm-enabled build of Qemu. I'll
> have to give that a try.
>
You can use qemu-kvm whether or not you have a kernel/CPU with KVM support:
$ cat /usr/bin/kvm
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/bin/qemu-system-
On 2011-09-29, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 28 September 2011, 17:15:34 schrieb Grant Edwards:
>
>>
>> Regardless, my point was that Linus's statement that it's unacceptable
>> to break things seemed rather disingenuous given the API churn that
>> Linux has compared with the BSD kern
On 2011-09-29, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 28 September 2011, 17:15:34 schrieb Grant Edwards:
>
>>
>> Regardless, my point was that Linus's statement that it's unacceptable
>> to break things seemed rather disingenuous given the API churn that
>> Linux has compared with the BSD kern
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 28 September 2011, 17:15:34 schrieb Grant Edwards:
>
>>
>> Regardless, my point was that Linus's statement that it's unacceptable
>> to break things seemed rather disingenuous given the API churn that
>> Linux has compared
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Linux has zero userland visible API 'churn'.
During what timeframe?
There have been massive Linux API breakages in 2004.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)
Am Mittwoch 28 September 2011, 23:24:41 schrieb Nilesh Govindarajan:
> I'll be soon getting a new desktop.
> I've fixed the CPU as AMD Phenom II 1075T
>
> These two motherboards came to my notice which support the above
> processor: Gigabyte 880GM - GA 880GM-USB3L & 880GM-USB3
>
> How good is Lin
Am Donnerstag 29 September 2011, 01:27:27 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
> On Tuesday 27 September 2011 17:52:24 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > which is your own fucking fault.
> >
> > Get your drivers into the kernel. Problem solved.
>
> Does gratuitous obscenity come naturally to you, or do you have
Am Mittwoch 28 September 2011, 17:15:34 schrieb Grant Edwards:
>
> Regardless, my point was that Linus's statement that it's unacceptable
> to break things seemed rather disingenuous given the API churn that
> Linux has compared with the BSD kernels.
Linux has zero userland visible API 'churn'.
Am Donnerstag 29 September 2011, 09:11:09 schrieb J.Marcos Sitorus:
> Hi Volker,
> Thanks for the reply.
> I have attach dmesg, xorg log, xsession-error, and kdm log.
>
> >So - get back to your last working versions - oh and those lvm volumes are
>
> on
> new disks?
> Nope. Previously I have two
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Tamer Higazi wrote:
> Am 29.09.2011 01:27, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Tamer Higazi wrote:
>>> Am 29.09.2011 00:03, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Tamer Higazi
wrote:
> Am 28.09.20
Nilesh Govindarajan nileshgr.com> writes:
> These two motherboards came to my notice which support the above
> processor: Gigabyte 880GM - GA 880GM-USB3L & 880GM-USB3
Dunno.
> How good is Linux support with those? If bad, what other mobos support
> 1075T and Linux support is awesome?
I'm post
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 09/29/2011 08:18 AM, Dale wrote:
As a general rule, hardware support is in the kernel. It shouldn't
matter much whether it is Gentoo, Redhat, Debian or any other distro.
It just matters that the kernel supports the hardware. I would imagine
that anything listed t
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:44:06PM +, James wrote:
>
> The kernel gyrations are all really about something much more important.
> *MONEY*
>
> ...Commercial distros like Apple's offering are making
> billions.
OS X is not a linux distribution.
It uses the xnu kernel, which fuses elements of
Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Dale wrote:
Dale makes note of the thing faster than light. Maybe I will get to live
longer now. lol I get about 7 to 8 years out of a build. So, I just went
from say 16 more years to say 24 or so. At my age with my health, I need
all t
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Alex Sla <4k3...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Alex Sla <4k3...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > I just read in the Internet something about 1.2 -> 1.4 should i do this
>> > like
>> > th
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Dale wrote:
> Spidey / Claudio wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 00:34, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sep 29, 2011 9:51 AM, "Dale" wrote:
>>>
As a general rule, hardware support is in the kernel. It shouldn't
matter
much whether it is Gentoo,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Alex Sla <4k3...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Alex Sla <4k3...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Todd Goodman
> wrote:
> >>>
> >
On Thu 29 Sep 2011 05:02:40 PM IST, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 29.09.2011 11:00, schrieb Adam Carter:
>> Sanity check please gurus :)
>> I've installed the new disks, partitioned them and created the md
>> devices, which are now syncing. The kernel already has all the modules
>> built in. I believ
On 09/29/2011 08:18 AM, Dale wrote:
> Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>> On Thu 29 Sep 2011 06:42:42 AM IST, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>>>
>>> That's debian HCL, what about Gentoo? We compile the kernel ourselves
>>> man.
>>> It would be better if we don't use debian/Ubuntu HCL to decide HW for
>>> oth
On Thursday 29 Sep 2011 04:40:15 Spidey / Claudio wrote:
> I have lived through some lock ups in the recent past, but that's
> because I've disassembled my desktop from it's case and assembled it
> at my working table. Since both PS/2 ports of the mobo are on my mouse
> pad (yeah, short cables, tig
Am 29.09.2011 11:00, schrieb Adam Carter:
> Sanity check please gurus :)
> I've installed the new disks, partitioned them and created the md
> devices, which are now syncing. The kernel already has all the modules
> built in. I believe the next steps are;
> 1 mkfs the md devices
> 2 copy the partit
You are absolutely right!
when I added asound.conf again, all alsa sources are directed to
pulseaudio and again no sound.
I am not an expert with pulseaudio. If you can help me there, I would
thank you.
In the meanwhile I will see how to get it handled. As I got it
(hopefully) solved, I will repo
Sanity check please gurus :)
I've installed the new disks, partitioned them and created the md
devices, which are now syncing. The kernel already has all the modules
built in. I believe the next steps are;
1 mkfs the md devices
2 copy the partitions from the current disk to the mirror
3 edit fstab
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:23:30 -0700, Grant wrote:
> For some reason I thought SFTP would provide access control but now
> I'm thinking it's just like SSH in that access control is based on
> file ownership and permissions? If that's the case, can anyone think
> of a better way to control remote ac
On Thursday 29 Sep 2011 07:57:49 Jonas de Buhr wrote:
> >> The problem with that is he will need to test his code in the working
> >> system.
>
> why in the production system?
>
> >>I need a way for him to be able to read/write to a certain
> >>
> >> file or files within the working system, but
60 matches
Mail list logo
