On 5 September 2011 02:24, Walter Dnes wrote:
> Whilst spelunking through ebuild files I notice that in addition to
> the usual ~amd64 and ~x86 keywords, I also see ~amd64-linux and
> ~x86-linux. What is the significance of this?
>
> --
> Walter Dnes
>
>
As far as I am aware, Gentoo now suppor
Whilst spelunking through ebuild files I notice that in addition to
the usual ~amd64 and ~x86 keywords, I also see ~amd64-linux and
~x86-linux. What is the significance of this?
--
Walter Dnes
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 08:50:46 +0200
Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> What do you mean with, "outside"?
I meant from another place via the Internet through my router to my
computer.
> [...]
> Hope this helps.
Yes, your suggestions helped. Thank you very much. Though it doesn't
solve the problem. Now I
On Sun, Sep 04 2011, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Allan Gottlieb writes:
>
>> I noticed that the last two (daily) dumps have been bad (too short,
>> unreadable by restore).
>>
>> I tried to remerge app-arch/dump both 0.4.44-r1 (which I had before)
>> and o.4.44. Both failed in the compile phase (detai
Allan Gottlieb writes:
> I noticed that the last two (daily) dumps have been bad (too short,
> unreadable by restore).
>
> I tried to remerge app-arch/dump both 0.4.44-r1 (which I had before)
> and o.4.44. Both failed in the compile phase (details below).
> This seem a little frightening to me.
I noticed that the last two (daily) dumps have been bad (too short,
unreadable by restore).
I tried to remerge app-arch/dump both 0.4.44-r1 (which I had before)
and o.4.44. Both failed in the compile phase (details below).
This seem a little frightening to me. Can someone tell me what has
happen
110817 Philip Webb wrote:
> 110815 Florian Philipp most helpfully wrote:
>>
>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Java_and_OpenOffice.org&oldid=15
> I deleted 'java' from the make.conf USE list
> & recompiled Libreoffice (latest testing) + Cups + 2 deps for KDE3.
> Pri
Hello,
On 04/09/11 01:29, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> RDEPEND=">=app-text/mupdf-0.8"
Oh sorry, I have forgotten to tell that I am using the girara branch,
which uses plugins and depends only on girara libs, it should be
fixed to have that, but I did not bother to do it previously as I had
all the d
On 09/04/2011 06:27 AM, Lars Madson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After upgrading world, I might have gone a bit fast on the last conf files
> that I update with etc-update.
> Now that I restart deluged, the init script brings up eth1 but I only have
> eth0 correctly setup.
> It should use eth0. In rc-update
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Lars Madson wrote:
> Hi,
> After upgrading world, I might have gone a bit fast on the last conf files
> that I update with etc-update.
> Now that I restart deluged, the init script brings up eth1 but I only have
> eth0 correctly setup.
> It should use eth0. In rc-up
Lars Madson wrote:
hm there's only one line in my /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules:
# This file was automatically generated by the /lib64/udev/write_net_rules
# program run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules file.
#
# You can modify it, as long as you keep each rule on a single
hm there's only one line in my /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules:
# This file was automatically generated by the /lib64/udev/write_net_rules
# program run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules file.
#
# You can modify it, as long as you keep each rule on a single line.
# PCI device
James Broadhead wrote:
make.config != make.conf
:)
Oh yea !!! Much better. I knew it had to be something stupid that only
I would do. I copied that from somewhere tho. I need to find out where
so I can report it. I get this now:
fireball / # eix-update
Reading Portage settings ..
B
make.config != make.conf
:)
Lars Madson wrote:
Hi,
After upgrading world, I might have gone a bit fast on the last conf
files that I update with etc-update.
Now that I restart deluged, the init script brings up eth1 but I only
have eth0 correctly setup.
It should use eth0. In rc-update list I see net.eth1, no net.eth0, i
Looks like you use a "memmap=1M$157M" (in my case) argument when booting
these days.
BillK
On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 20:38 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
> Do any of the gentoo kernels have the badram patch? - just found a 2G
> stick with one stuck bit :(
>
> Googling for this shows activity up
Hi,
After upgrading world, I might have gone a bit fast on the last conf files
that I update with etc-update.
Now that I restart deluged, the init script brings up eth1 but I only have
eth0 correctly setup.
It should use eth0. In rc-update list I see net.eth1, no net.eth0, if it can
help.
My ques
Andrea Conti wrote:
No such file or directory: '/var/lib/layman/make.config'
^^
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 64 Sep 3 22:49 /var/lib/layman/make.conf
That's either a typo or
cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Dale wrote:
I'm working on the install for my friend still. Since KDE4 wants to
stay in bed, I thought I would try KDE3 from the overlay. I read not
long ago that it is still somewhat kicking. So I installed layman and
added the overlay. I then added this line
On 09/03/2011 02:25 PM, fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
> Upgrading /etc/modules, I notice it has 2_6 for all its examples;
> should this be changed to 3_0 if running a 3.0 kernel? I am going to
> expand it with both, for the time being, but all the gentoo.org docs
> still show 2_6, and it made me think,
Grant Edwards writes:
> On 2011-08-31, Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Grant Edwards
>> wrote:
b) old school pc-speaker in your computer
[...]
>> I think it just made the generic "beep" (or a beep short enough and
>> low enough in tone to sound similar to a click)
>
Do any of the gentoo kernels have the badram patch? - just found a 2G
stick with one stuck bit :(
Googling for this shows activity up to 2.6.28 - then nothing. Did it
get included in the kernel?
Otherwise its roll my own ...
BillK
On Sunday 04 September 2011 01:44:31 I wrote:
> On Sunday 04 September 2011 01:19:51 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > It doesn't support KMail folders directly (Claws doesn't do traditional
> > MailDir, it's native format is MH) but you can find import scripts
> > here:
> >
> > http://www.claws-mail.org/t
>> No such file or directory: '/var/lib/layman/make.config'
^^
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 64 Sep 3 22:49 /var/lib/layman/make.conf
That's either a typo or the source of the prob
24 matches
Mail list logo
