6/26/2011, "walt" вы писали:
>#cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-cd.rules
># This file was automatically generated by the /lib/udev/write_cd_rules
># program, run by the cd-aliases-generator.rules rules file.
>#
># You can modify it, as long as you keep each rule on a single
># line, and set th
On 6/26/2011 4:01 PM, Dale wrote:
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Am Sonntag, 26. Juni 2011, 10:28:47 schrieb Dale:
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Try euse -I fortran.
If anything besides gcc pops up, you should have one.
That doesn't appear to work like it should then. I get this:
root@fir
Neil Bothwick writes:
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:34:56 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> (From chrooted shell)
>>
>> root@sysresccd /dev % ls -l console null
>> crw-rw 1 root root 5, 1 Jun 26 17:33 console
>> crw-rw 1 root root 1, 3 Jun 26 17:33 null
>
> When you chroot to the install root,
On 06/25/2011 03:32 PM, Alexey Mishustin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> After updating udev the links /dev/cdrom, /dev/dvd etc disappeared. There
> are four /dev/sgX but there is no /dev/srX at all. No hdX, all sdX are
> hard drives. So, I can't mount any cd or dvd.
>
> My drive is IDE (Pioneer).
I assume it'
Necro bump!
On 8 May 2011, at 02:31, luis jure wrote:
> …
> for some reason the file /usr/lib64/libz.so is a text file, the solution
> was linking it to the real .so file at /lib64/libz.so (or /lib64/libz.so.1
> in my case). after that lilypond builds just fine.
This isn't the best fix, IMO. AIU
Am Sonntag, 26. Juni 2011, 15:01:19 schrieb Dale:
> Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 26. Juni 2011, 10:28:47 schrieb Dale:
> >> Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> >>> Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 14:58:56 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
> Whether "many" operations are written in Fortran is imm
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> First, thanks for going well beyond the call of duty and showing the
> patience of Job.
>
Gawd, you must not know about all the public help I've received here
over the years? It's the LEAST I can do.
> Those files are there already and h
2011/6/26 Ignas Anikevicius :
> Hi guys,
>
> I wanted to ask how to check what scripts/events are started when I
> press a key? I have some automagical stuff happening when I press Fn+F5
> (I have a Thinkpad x200s). To be more precise, my Wifi card is switched
> off and on and I want to know what i
I'm getting this when running layman -S:
"kde" /var/lib/layman/kde (cache: parse|ebuild*#metadata-flat#assign)
Reading category 75|155 ( 48%): kde-base .. * Unknown KMNAME
smoke: Guessing branch name 'KDE/4.6'
* Unknown KMNAME smoke: Guessing branch name 'KDE/4.7'
Does anyone know wha
Hi guys,
I wanted to ask how to check what scripts/events are started when I
press a key? I have some automagical stuff happening when I press Fn+F5
(I have a Thinkpad x200s). To be more precise, my Wifi card is switched
off and on and I want to know what is causing this and turn it off.
Thanks a
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Am Sonntag, 26. Juni 2011, 10:28:47 schrieb Dale:
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 14:58:56 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
Whether "many" operations are written in Fortran is immaterial. What
matters to me is whether any on my sy
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:34:56 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> (From chrooted shell)
>
> root@sysresccd /dev % ls -l console null
> crw-rw 1 root root 5, 1 Jun 26 17:33 console
> crw-rw 1 root root 1, 3 Jun 26 17:33 null
When you chroot to the install root, you normally bind mount dev first,
Anyone emerged gcc lately? I've been doing it all day (it seems)
so I finally used top to see if something besides gcc is using cpu.
Sure enough, emerge is constantly using 50% cpu while the compiler
is using the other half.
I tried using ebuild directly instead of emerge and I find that now
ebu
Am Sonntag, 26. Juni 2011, 10:28:47 schrieb Dale:
> Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 14:58:56 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
> >> Whether "many" operations are written in Fortran is immaterial. What
> >> matters to me is whether any on my system are. If they aren't, I
> >> don'
On Sunday 26 Jun 2011 19:09:40 Albert Hopkins wrote:
> On Sunday, June 26 at 18:28 (+0100), Mick said:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I was trying to record my desktop using:
> >
> > ffmpeg -f x11grab -s xga -r 25 -i :0.0 -aspect 4:3 /tmp/out.mpg
> >
> > but the result is rather blurred as you can see in t
Mark Knecht writes:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>>
>> The boot process does get a little farther but comes to a halt at
>>
>> Switching to clock source tsc
>>
>> And there it has sat for some time now. Apparently is not going to continue.
>
> That EXACT symptom wa
On Sunday, June 26 at 18:28 (+0100), Mick said:
> Hi All,
>
> I was trying to record my desktop using:
>
> ffmpeg -f x11grab -s xga -r 25 -i :0.0 -aspect 4:3 /tmp/out.mpg
>
> but the result is rather blurred as you can see in the attached screenshot,
> when I play it with mplayer.
>
> Is th
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I was trying to record my desktop using:
>
> ffmpeg -f x11grab -s xga -r 25 -i :0.0 -aspect 4:3 /tmp/out.mpg
>
> but the result is rather blurred as you can see in the attached screenshot,
> when I play it with mplayer.
>
> Is there some o
6/26/2011, "Alexey Mishustin" вы писали:
># lsmod | egrep "rs_mod|cdrom|marvel"
>cdrom 24804 1 sr_mod
>pata_marvell1761 0
>libata123278 53
>libsas,pdc_adma,sata_inic162x,sata_mv,ata_piix,ahci,libahci,sata_qstor,sata_vsc,sata_uli,sata_sis,sata_sx4,sa
6/26/2011, "walt" вы писали:
>On 06/25/2011 05:03 PM, walt wrote:
>> On 06/25/2011 03:32 PM, Alexey Mishustin wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> After updating udev the links /dev/cdrom, /dev/dvd etc disappeared. There
>>> are four /dev/sgX but there is no /dev/srX at all. No hdX, all sdX are
>>> hard drives
Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 14:58:56 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
Whether "many" operations are written in Fortran is immaterial. What matters
to me is whether any on my system are. If they aren't, I don't need a
Fortran compiler and I'd rather not waste system resour
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> The boot process does get a little farther but comes to a halt at
>
> Switching to clock source tsc
>
> And there it has sat for some time now. Apparently is not going to continue.
That EXACT symptom was EXACTLY what we saw on new hardwa
On Sunday 26 June 2011 11:45:24 Stroller wrote:
> I would be glad to bitch out the devs and say "why aren't you doing it
> this way?", "why isn't this fixed yet?" but I don't feel I have any
> right to. I'm reserving bitching out the devs until I can afford to pay
> them money on a regular basis.
Harry Putnam writes:
> Mark Knecht writes:
>
>> I think we're not communicating then. The file I sent you was
[...]
> Egad... I wasn't far off about brain dead. I got mixed up with
> another fellow who posted an appliance. I'm really sorry. And thanks
> for the config... I'll try it with a k
On Saturday 25 June 2011 20:12:00 Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> Try euse -I fortran.
> If anything besides gcc pops up, you should have one.
Nope.
--
Rgds
Peter
Am Sonntag, 26. Juni 2011, 13:10:36 schrieb Mike Edenfield:
> I've just switched my laptop over to KDE4 to see how it
> feels on the smaller screen, and I can't find the KDE
> equivalent of nm-applet. KDE 3's knetworkmanager doesn't
> compile for me, and when I run the GNOME nm-applet it adds
> and
I've just switched my laptop over to KDE4 to see how it
feels on the smaller screen, and I can't find the KDE
equivalent of nm-applet. KDE 3's knetworkmanager doesn't
compile for me, and when I run the GNOME nm-applet it adds
and then immediately removes itself from the notification area.
I u
On 25 June 2011, at 14:58, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday 25 June 2011 13:46:35 justin wrote:
> ...
>> Trying to avoid any fortran at all is stupid,
>
> That's the sort of arrogance that gets developers a bad name.
>
>> as already mentioned many math operations are faster if programmed in
>
On 26 June 2011, at 04:42, Michael George wrote:
> I upgraded cups to 1.4.6 today and my Macs could no longer print to it.
> …
>
> I'm not sure what I'm missing for the Macs to be happy like they were
> with 1.3 and avahi.
Version of CUPS on your Mac?
http://localhost:631/
Stoller.
William Kenworthy wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 14:45 -0500, Dale wrote:
What I like is the speed it got corrected. People that don't sync often
most likely didn't even know it ever changed.
...
I got bit, on a 6 monthly major update across multiple systems - what
were the odds of
Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 6/25/2011 8:04 AM, Dale wrote:
We restructured the dependency chain for fortran support,
which includes
a compile test now. The failure can be seen above.
The Problem was in short, USE=fortran was enabled by
default for linux
arches, but people tend to disable it. Depe
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:34:30 +0200 (CEST)
Alain DIDIERJEAN wrote:
> Citing Alan Mackenzies:
> It's a
> strange, depressing feeling when the only input device which works is the
> reset button - thank goodness that isn't handled by evdev. ;-)
Please use the > mark for quotes or it's a pain to re
32 matches
Mail list logo
