On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> I'm actually working to integrate a new HD monitor in a system built before
> HD was invented. The monitor works better than the old one, but just in 4:3
> aspect mode. But that's another thread, I only mention it so you know I'm
> as wel
I'm actually working to integrate a new HD monitor in a system built before
HD was invented. The monitor works better than the old one, but just in 4:3
aspect mode. But that's another thread, I only mention it so you know I'm
as well off as I was before the old monitor fritzed out on me.
In orde
> That bug seems to concern mostly Solaris and mostly on SPARC, if I read
> it correctly. Is that your situation?
>
Not at all. It´s an ordinary PC. Why does it search this archive64 thingy?
Looks like a bug. I am searching a workaround.
> Anyway, the word "profile" in gentoo usually refers to
BRM wrote:
Wireshark will show you the raw packet data, and decode only a little of it -
enough to identify the general protocol, senders, etc.
So to understand the packet, you will need to understand the application layer
protocol - in this case HTTP - yourself as Wireshark won't help you there.
On 08/24/2010 12:23 PM, Al wrote:
OK, this is a Prefix related bug, but I don't want to bother the small
team, with every question of a gentoo beginner.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291488
Binutils tries to build a 64 bit module on a 32 bit machine: archive64
something...
That bug s
dhk wrote:
On 08/24/2010 06:59 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Dale wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Kevin O'Gorman
wrote:
Yah, I might have some luck with that. Since I'm years out of practice
fooling with t
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Kevin O'Gorman
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Paul Hartman
>
> [major snippage]
> Check out x11-apps/amlc -- it has an interactive modeline generator
> where you tell it the aspect ratio &
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:10 PM, dhk wrote:
> On 08/24/2010 06:59 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Dale wrote:
> >> Paul Hartman wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Kevin O'Gorman
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>
> Yah, I might have some luck with that.
I install the ati-drivers-10.7.1 just now,this version it seem support
openCL 1.1.
Any games base on it?
Thanks.
On 08/24/2010 06:59 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Paul Hartman wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Kevin O'Gorman
>>> wrote:
>>>
Yah, I might have some luck with that. Since I'm years out of practice
fooling with this stuff (
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Dale wrote:
> Paul Hartman wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Kevin O'Gorman
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Yah, I might have some luck with that. Since I'm years out of practice
>>> fooling with this stuff (last seen in 2002) can someone point me at the
>>> too
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
Yah, I might have some luck with that. Since I'm years out of practice
fooling with this stuff (last seen in 2002) can someone point me at the
tools for
1) Computing a modeline (I understand the quality varies a lo
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Kevin O'Gorman
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Mick wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 24 August 2010 11:23, Adam Carter wrote:
On 8/24/2010 5:45 PM, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
A good idea might be to install the package app-portage/eix. It allows you to,
amongst other things, to search for packages in case you're uncertain about a
package name. The search will also tell you whether the package is installed,
what ver
On 8/24/2010 5:44 PM, Mike Edenfield wrote:
Since you're building from
source, very few programs actually need to be 32-bit apps on a 64-bit
OS. ... In this case, the Wine
package maintainer has set up the ebuild to build 32-bit by default,
even on an amd64 profile. ...
there is a whole list of
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Paul Hartman <
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Kevin O'Gorman
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Mick wrote:
> >>
> >> On 24 August 2010 11:23, Adam Carter wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> No. I ditched my xor
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:15:41AM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 08/24/2010 11:53 PM, tpar...@etherstorm.net wrote:
> > I have a new (first) gentoo amd64 install, multilib, and have been
> > searching the docs, forums and google for information on how to handle
> > emerges for 32bit programs
On 8/24/2010 5:15 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
There is no such package. There are only very few -bin packages. In
other words, "-bin" is not a magic string you append to package names.
As for Wine, the ebuild changed recently to offer both 64bit as well as
32bit Wine. I think the binaries are c
On 8/24/2010 4:53 PM, tpar...@etherstorm.net wrote:
> I have a new (first) gentoo amd64 install, multilib, and have been
> searching the docs, forums and google for information on how to handle
> emerges for 32bit programs on the 64bit install.
>
> I have found some references to using -bin for 32
On 08/24/2010 11:53 PM, tpar...@etherstorm.net wrote:
I have a new (first) gentoo amd64 install, multilib, and have been
searching the docs, forums and google for information on how to handle
emerges for 32bit programs on the 64bit install.
I have found some references to using -bin for 32bit pr
I have a new (first) gentoo amd64 install, multilib, and have been
searching the docs, forums and google for information on how to handle
emerges for 32bit programs on the 64bit install.
I have found some references to using -bin for 32bit programs (example:
"emerge wine-bin" to get the 32bit
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 08/24/10 19:17:05, Arttu V. wrote:
On 8/24/10, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 08/24/10 13:45:05, Robin Atwood wrote:
On Tuesday 24 August 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to create an ebuild (in my local overlay) which refers
to
a
local distribution file.
I
OK, this is a Prefix related bug, but I don't want to bother the small
team, with every question of a gentoo beginner.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291488
Binutils tries to build a 64 bit module on a 32 bit machine: archive64
something.
They write I have to remove the -L/usr/sfw/lib/64
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Mick wrote:
>>
>> On 24 August 2010 11:23, Adam Carter wrote:
>> >
>> >> No. I ditched my xorg.conf completely; it had been there just because
>> >> I
>> >> couldn't get the Westinghouse monitor to wo
On 08/24/10 19:17:05, Arttu V. wrote:
> On 8/24/10, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > On 08/24/10 13:45:05, Robin Atwood wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 24 August 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I'd like to create an ebuild (in my local overlay) which refers
> to
> >> a
> >> > local distribu
On 8/24/10, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 08/24/10 13:45:05, Robin Atwood wrote:
>> On Tuesday 24 August 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'd like to create an ebuild (in my local overlay) which refers to
>> a
>> > local distribution file.
>> >
>> > I've tried
>> >
>> > SRC_URI="file:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Mick wrote:
> On 24 August 2010 11:23, Adam Carter wrote:
> >
> >> No. I ditched my xorg.conf completely; it had been there just because I
> >> couldn't get the Westinghouse monitor to work without it. The Xorg logs
> >> show it recognizes a boatload of
> >> mo
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:40 PM, wrote:
>
>
> 1) Did you made entries for right resolution mode in xorg.conf
>
I modified xorg.conf just to change the idenity info about the monitor. Not
seeing any effect, I
deleted xorg.conf entirely, and that's how I'm runnung now, and got the
Xorg.0.log I a
James writes:
> My friend threw a theory out there -- maybe the beginning of the
> partition is incorrect on the drive? The drive originally had an NTFS
> partition. By blowing away the beginning of the drive and then
> rewriting the partition table, maybe the kernel was using the original
> "begi
Sorry -- it's a USB device so the drive letter has changed as I've
moved the drive around.
My friend threw a theory out there -- maybe the beginning of the
partition is incorrect on the drive? The drive originally had an NTFS
partition. By blowing away the beginning of the drive and then
rewriting
On 08/24/10 13:45:05, Robin Atwood wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 August 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to create an ebuild (in my local overlay) which refers to
> a
> > local distribution file.
> >
> > I've tried
> >
> > SRC_URI="file::///usr/local/Src/MyPack.tar.bz2"
> >
> > b
On 24 August 2010 15:46, James wrote:
> Yep, positive. Just checked through my history:
>
> mkreiserfs -f /dev/sdd1
> mount /dev/sdd1 /mnt/backup
Hmm ... if you have made a fs on sdd1, why are you trying to mount
sdf1 in your first post?
... or is sdd1 now being recognised by udev as sdf1?
I am
I am the same problems with 2.6.35, now I downgrade to 2.6.34-r6, it is
normal till now
2010/8/23 Alan Warren
> Thanks Mark, I'll look into that config option, and try again with top
> open.
>
> In this case I was doing a home backup to a 1TB WD Caviar black formatted
> as ext3.
>
> I also have
Yep, positive. Just checked through my history:
mkreiserfs -f /dev/sdd1
mount /dev/sdd1 /mnt/backup
While I'm not opposed to paying $25 to namesys, I'm (a) not certain
they will able to fix this cluster, and (b) I'm more inclined to turn
to the open source community for help. Googling reveals thi
Albert,
Thanks for the response.
"dd" for the lazy -- takes 2 seconds to wipe the top of the drive
instead of getting rid of numerous partitions that the manufacturer
put on the drive.
The disk isn't bad -- if it was then I wouldn't have the ability to
recover the files via foremost / scalpel.
Mick writes:
> On Sunday 22 August 2010 22:39:47 Alex Schuster wrote:
> > BTW, my two additional drives spin up when I log into KDE. Weird,
> > they are not even mounted.
>
> From KDE-4.4.4 the start up interferes with the hard drives:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/232044
Thanks, Mick, Robin and Alan!
Helmut.
On Tuesday 24 August 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 08/24/10 13:45:05, Robin Atwood wrote:
> > On Tuesday 24 August 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'd like to create an ebuild (in my local overlay) which refers to
> >
> > a
> >
> > > local distribution file.
> > >
> > > I
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:01 on Tuesday 24 August 2010, Helmut
Jarausch did opine thusly:
> On 08/24/10 13:45:05, Robin Atwood wrote:
> > On Tuesday 24 August 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'd like to create an ebuild (in my local overlay) which refers to
> >
> > a
On 24 August 2010 12:25, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to create an ebuild (in my local overlay) which refers to a
> local distribution file.
>
> I've tried
>
> SRC_URI="file::///usr/local/Src/MyPack.tar.bz2"
>
> but "file://" doesn't seem to be supported.
>
> Is there any alternative?
On 08/24/10 13:45:05, Robin Atwood wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 August 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to create an ebuild (in my local overlay) which refers to
> a
> > local distribution file.
> >
> > I've tried
> >
> > SRC_URI="file::///usr/local/Src/MyPack.tar.bz2"
> >
> > b
On Tuesday 24 August 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to create an ebuild (in my local overlay) which refers to a
> local distribution file.
>
> I've tried
>
> SRC_URI="file::///usr/local/Src/MyPack.tar.bz2"
>
> but "file://" doesn't seem to be supported.
>
> Is there any altern
On 24 August 2010 11:23, Adam Carter wrote:
>
>> No. I ditched my xorg.conf completely; it had been there just because I
>> couldn't get the Westinghouse monitor to work without it. The Xorg logs
>> show it recognizes a boatload of
>> modes that the monitor likes, but gives an alibi for not usin
Hi,
I'd like to create an ebuild (in my local overlay) which refers to a
local distribution file.
I've tried
SRC_URI="file::///usr/local/Src/MyPack.tar.bz2"
but "file://" doesn't seem to be supported.
Is there any alternative?
Thanks for a hint,
Helmut.
(I'm using portage-2.2._rc68)
> No. I ditched my xorg.conf completely; it had been there just because I
> couldn't get the Westinghouse monitor to work without it. The Xorg logs
> show it recognizes a boatload of
> modes that the monitor likes, but gives an alibi for not using the HD
> ones. The approach
> does not seem prom
To display 1920x1080 resolution with 32 bit colors, you need 8,294,400
bytes of video memory. So if you have more than eight megs of video
mem you shouldn't need to buy a new one.
have you tried something like
xrandr --auto
---
Petri Rosenström
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:40 AM, wrote:
>> On
46 matches
Mail list logo
