Walter Dnes waltdnes.org> writes:
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 02:57:58PM +0800, rocwhite168 wrote
>
> > On the other hand, I'm trying to configure the kernel manually. I
> > did this according to several online tutorials, but it still won't
> > even start up: "Root filesystem could not be mount
Walter Dnes waltdnes.org> writes:
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 02:57:58PM +0800, rocwhite168 wrote
>
> > On the other hand, I'm trying to configure the kernel manually. I
> > did this according to several online tutorials, but it still won't
> > even start up: "Root filesystem could not be mount
Kaddeh gmail.com> writes:
>
> it would help to also put your /etc/fstaband let us know what FS you have
> root
setup asin addition to your /boot/grub/grub.conf
> 2010/6/20 rocwhite168 163.com>
> I used genkernel to configure the kernel. It complained every time at
> shutdown
that
>
> "Code:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 02:57:58PM +0800, rocwhite168 wrote
> On the other hand, I'm trying to configure the kernel manually. I
> did this according to several online tutorials, but it still won't
> even start up: "Root filesystem could not be mounted read/write." Can
> anyone please have a look a
Bill Kenworthy wrote:
<< SNIP >>
5. Tune the kernel swappable parameter to either force most everything
to swap to keep ram free or the other way to make it less likely to swap
if thats whats needed. The current parameter is a compromise that works
in most cases, but there are uses that benefit
walt wrote:
On 06/21/2010 03:37 PM, Dale wrote:
I don't use initrd and not sure why most people need one...
Good point, and I'd like to know why, too. AFAIK the major use of initrd
is on installation CD's, where the maker of the install disk has no
way of
knowing in advance what hardware/fi
I've setup my Gentoo box to use en_GB as the default locale
in /etc/env.d/02locale with tips from the Gentoo Localisation Guide[0].
Is it at all possible to set a locale, i.e. cy_GB to be the primary LANG
parameter but if there is no .po for cy_GB or the .po is incomplete to
use en_GB as a backup i
On 06/21/2010 03:37 PM, Dale wrote:
I don't use initrd and not sure why most people need one...
Good point, and I'd like to know why, too. AFAIK the major use of initrd
is on installation CD's, where the maker of the install disk has no way of
knowing in advance what hardware/filesystems the
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 00:27 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Walter Dnes writes:
>
> > I just got a brand new custom-built 8 gig machine. There's an outfit
> > in north Toronto that has MSI motherboards with PS/2 ports, so I can
> > keep my genuine IBM PS/2 clickety-clack-keyboard; woho.
Bill Longman wrote:
On 06/21/2010 01:23 PM, Dale wrote:
The only thing that genkernel would add is your initrd. The kernel is
exactly the same, whether you compile it with "make" or through
"genkernel". Do a test and you'll see. (I'm assuming we're both talking
about gentoo-sources, not vani
Walter Dnes writes:
> I just got a brand new custom-built 8 gig machine. There's an outfit
> in north Toronto that has MSI motherboards with PS/2 ports, so I can
> keep my genuine IBM PS/2 clickety-clack-keyboard; woho. And the
> integrated Intel graphics chip has *BOTH VGA AND DIGITAL
On Monday 21 June 2010 23:44:58 Michael Sullivan wrote:
> I just rebooted the computer to make sure this wasn't some weird RAM
> remnant, but the computer booted up:
Everything below is correct. What makes you think its wrong?
testparm does not dump a config file, it tells you what setting are IN
On Tuesday 22 June 2010 00:04:14 Walter Dnes wrote:
> I just got a brand new custom-built 8 gig machine. There's an outfit
> in north Toronto that has MSI motherboards with PS/2 ports, so I can
> keep my genuine IBM PS/2 clickety-clack-keyboard; woho. And the
> integrated Intel graphics
I just got a brand new custom-built 8 gig machine. There's an outfit
in north Toronto that has MSI motherboards with PS/2 ports, so I can
keep my genuine IBM PS/2 clickety-clack-keyboard; woho. And the
integrated Intel graphics chip has *BOTH VGA AND DIGITAL OUTPUTS*!
Anyhow, I have
On 06/21/2010 01:23 PM, Dale wrote:
>> The only thing that genkernel would add is your initrd. The kernel is
>> exactly the same, whether you compile it with "make" or through
>> "genkernel". Do a test and you'll see. (I'm assuming we're both talking
>> about gentoo-sources, not vanilla-sources. Ei
I just rebooted the computer to make sure this wasn't some weird RAM
remnant, but the computer booted up:
carter ~ # /etc/init.d/samba status
* status: started
carter ~ # cat /etc/samba/smb.conf
[global]
workgroup = MYGROUP
security = user
encrypt passwords = yes
guest account = guest
wins s
Bill Longman wrote:
On 06/21/2010 12:01 PM, Dale wrote:
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
I don't use genkernel anymore. I just roll my own. That way, I know
what is in there and what is not. Then if something doesn't work, I
know if it is the kernel or something else. W
I found out evince 2.30 made its way into the tree, but I see no "bug"
in bugzilla regarding evince stabilization.
As the commit message states "new version for Gnome 2.30", does this
means I should look at the bug to stabilize Gnome 2.30 (#324077)
instead?
--
TIA,
Nuno J. Silva
gopher://sdf-eu.
On 06/21/2010 12:01 PM, Dale wrote:
> Alex Schuster wrote:
>> Dale writes:
>>
>>
>>> I don't use genkernel anymore. I just roll my own. That way, I know
>>> what is in there and what is not. Then if something doesn't work, I
>>> know if it is the kernel or something else. With genkernel, you
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
I don't use genkernel anymore. I just roll my own. That way, I know
what is in there and what is not. Then if something doesn't work, I
know if it is the kernel or something else. With genkernel, you won't
have a clue what it is since you don't know much
Dale writes:
> I don't use genkernel anymore. I just roll my own. That way, I know
> what is in there and what is not. Then if something doesn't work, I
> know if it is the kernel or something else. With genkernel, you won't
> have a clue what it is since you don't know much if anything about t
Bill Longman wrote:
This is funny. I have NEVER got a genkernel to work on my system.
Actually, on any system. I'm not sure the OP would know that kernel is
any better then the one he makes.
Dale,
If you've never gotten genkernel to work, you should try this little
script that I'v
> This is funny. I have NEVER got a genkernel to work on my system.
> Actually, on any system. I'm not sure the OP would know that kernel is
> any better then the one he makes.
Dale,
If you've never gotten genkernel to work, you should try this little
script that I've used for the past few ye
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 05:40, W.Kenworthy wrote:
> So is there anything better for flash when using firefox to browse the
> web?
You can try gnash.
Ward
24 matches
Mail list logo
