On 04/03/09 10:34, alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and
performed "emerge system" ?
What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell...
--
~adj~
I just notice that there is a problem with CFLAGS -march=native on
Hi All,
I have an rpm binary which looks like this on a RH
machine: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/packageXXX.el5.i386.rpm
How can I use this on a gentoo machine (I understand that it won't be
maintained by portage).
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
> BACKGROUND:
>
> Am preparing for the xorg update, and hal wants to bring in cryptsetup:
>
> ('ebuild', '/', 'sys-fs/cryptsetup-1.0.5-r1', 'merge') pulled in by
> >=sys-fs/cryptsetup-1.0.5 required by ('ebuild', '/',
> 'sys
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:35:41 -0700
"Kevin O'Gorman" wrote:
> > After a bit of Googling, it seems the accepted solution is to use
> > HTML entities for those symbols and not try to use the raw
> > characters as you are attempting to do.
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_XML_and_HTML_cha
I upgraded to gcc-4.3.2-r3 rebuild system, world. The only package that did
not compile was g-wrap.
However, when I run "revdep-rebuild" it quits at 21%
Does anybody know how to fix it?
I tried recompiling gentoolkit; did not help.
--
Joseph
Have you tried Firewall Builder? You can use Firewall Builder to make all
the rules for iptables.
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 8:47 AM, gigli wrote:
> Peter Humphrey skrev:
> > On Sunday 05 April 2009 11:41:55 gigli wrote:
> >
> >> i will give shorewall a new try and hope i'll make better progress t
BACKGROUND:
Am preparing for the xorg update, and hal wants to bring in cryptsetup:
('ebuild', '/', 'sys-fs/cryptsetup-1.0.5-r1', 'merge') pulled in by
>=sys-fs/cryptsetup-1.0.5 required by ('ebuild', '/',
'sys-apps/hal-0.5.11-r8', 'merge')
A quick look at the ebuild reveals this:
IUSE
ABCD writes:
>> Is it related to hal daemon problem?
>> emerge -vuD glibc
>> [...]
>>usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a
> Completed installing glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2 into
> /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2/image/
>>
> [snip sandbox error]
>
> That actually is completely separ
On Sunday 05 April 2009, Daniel Troeder wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 13:59 -0400, Wyatt Epp wrote:
> > So while gearing up for the Summer of Code, I noted a lot of things
> > that I had come to accept as normal that I feel should not be so.
> > Things like the danger of depclean or the way portag
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 13:59 -0400, Wyatt Epp wrote:
> So while gearing up for the Summer of Code, I noted a lot of things
> that I had come to accept as normal that I feel should not be so.
> Things like the danger of depclean or the way portage will only show
> one mask at a time. So I was curiou
On a x86 machine I did
emerge -D -uav world
and got a response that included the following messages about gegl:
make[4]: Entering directory
`/var/tmp/portage/media-libs/gegl-0.0.22/work/gegl-0.0.22/docs/gallery'
--[Updating sample compositions]--
./clones.xml
** Message: Module '../../operations/w
Hi,
I've got a problem running screen in a gnome-terminal: all the usual
keystroks (for example: ^a c) don't work. When i press ctrl+a d, i
just get a d on the terminal. Screen works perfectly when i start it
in a xterm.
I haven't got a clue where to search for the problem. Any ideas?
Thanks.
Wa
On Sunday 05 April 2009 15:43:40 Saphirus Sage wrote:
> I would usually consider it unwise to attempt a Gentoo installation
> without access to the handbook and any other online resource (Google).
> If a user is actually wondering what flags they need to enable, simply
> checking wikipedia would s
ABCD wrote:
> John P. Burkett wrote:
>> Doing revdep-rebuild on an amd64 machine, I received a response
>> the included the following lines:
>> * All prepared. Starting rebuild
>> emerge --oneshot app-text/xpdf:0
>> gnome-base/gnome-panel:0
>> kde-base/kdegraphics:3.5
>> mail-client/-MERGING-evolu
On Apr 5, 2009, at 6:06 AM, Stroller
wrote:
On 5 Apr 2009, at 10:35, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Sunday 05 April 2009 10:22:26 Peter Humphrey wrote:
I raised a bug complaining of this not long ago, which received one
reply. Then silence. It's too hard a job, requiring understanding,
imag
Peter Humphrey skrev:
> On Sunday 05 April 2009 11:41:55 gigli wrote:
>
>> i will give shorewall a new try and hope i'll make better progress thsi
>> time
>
> My gateway machine has three interfaces and uses shorewall to protect them.
> If you like I could tar up /etc/shorewall and send it to y
On Sunday 05 April 2009 11:41:55 gigli wrote:
> i will give shorewall a new try and hope i'll make better progress thsi
> time
My gateway machine has three interfaces and uses shorewall to protect them.
If you like I could tar up /etc/shorewall and send it to you. I've had to
create macros for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John P. Burkett wrote:
> Doing revdep-rebuild on an amd64 machine, I received a response
> the included the following lines:
> * All prepared. Starting rebuild
> emerge --oneshot app-text/xpdf:0
> gnome-base/gnome-panel:0
> kde-base/kdegraphics:3.5
>
Florian Philipp skrev:
> forgottenwizard schrieb:
>> On 00:24 Sun 05 Apr, gigli wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I wonder if there is any easy firewall for gentoo. I tried ubuntu for a
>>> while and used their ufw, which was very simple.
>>>
>>> My needs:
>>>
>>> Block incoming traffic except for sshd and htt
On 5 Apr 2009, at 10:35, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Sunday 05 April 2009 10:22:26 Peter Humphrey wrote:
I raised a bug complaining of this not long ago, which received one
reply. Then silence. It's too hard a job, requiring understanding,
imagination and a flair with words.
Actually, I've jus
On Sunday 05 April 2009 10:22:26 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I raised a bug complaining of this not long ago, which received one
> reply. Then silence. It's too hard a job, requiring understanding,
> imagination and a flair with words.
Actually, I've just checked, and some of the specific entries I c
On Friday 03 April 2009 18:59:24 Wyatt Epp wrote:
> I was curious...what have people [...] noticed that is mildly irritating
> and disruptive to the Gentoo experience?
/usr/portage/profiles/use.desc and ...use.local.desc (though "mildly" isn't
the word I'd use). For the most part they remind me
forgottenwizard schrieb:
> On 00:24 Sun 05 Apr, gigli wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I wonder if there is any easy firewall for gentoo. I tried ubuntu for a
>> while and used their ufw, which was very simple.
>>
>> My needs:
>>
>> Block incoming traffic except for sshd and https (and sometimes
>> bittorrent) a
On Sunday 05 April 2009 00:11:52 Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> > There are some special cases where the gcc devs break stuff at an ABI
> > level between versions (usually related to C++ not to C). These are well
> > known and heavily documented - the toolchain devs make sure of this. 3.3
> > to 3.4 was
On Sunday 05 April 2009 01:31:16 Joseph wrote:
> On 04/04/09 23:55, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> [snip]
>
> >> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml
> >
> >This is complete nonsense advice. There is absolutely no need to rebuild
> > the entire system every time you upgrade compilers, and who
Norman Rieß writes:
> There was a lib update, that broke sancho a while ago. A new version of
> sancho fixed this. But i had to use this new version from the developers
> site, because even ~arch package was several versions lower.
> Some weeks ago the oscar protocol or something was changed and
Nick Fortino wrote:
> John P. Burkett wrote:
>> Doing revdep-rebuild on an amd64 machine, I received a response
>> the included the following lines:
>> * All prepared. Starting rebuild
>> emerge --oneshot app-text/xpdf:0
>> gnome-base/gnome-panel:0
>> kde-base/kdegraphics:3.5
>> mail-client/-MERGI
27 matches
Mail list logo
