On Thursday 02 April 2009 06:16:37 Mike Kazantsev wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:43:21 -0500
>
> Dale wrote:
> > > KH konstantinhansen.de> writes:
> > >> Q: Why is top-posting evil?
> > >> A: .backwards read don't humans because
> >
> > OK. Everyone that hates top posting please reply with a +1
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 21:44:30 Andrew Syrewicze wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I followed the gentoo instructions to properly update to the new version
> of GCC. I read from other posts that it isn't truly nessecary to
> re-emerge any packages for this particular upgrade, but i'm still fairly
> new t
* maxim wexler (bliss...@yahoo.com) [02.04.09 01:04]:
>
> > >
> > > Can anybody help? I hate Xandros, it reminds me of
> > Win98!
> >
> > Well: use Xandros to install gentoo.
>
> Xandros has already used up *all* of the HD on one partition. I can't
> format the drive without destroying the OS
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:43:21 -0500
Dale wrote:
> > KH konstantinhansen.de> writes:
> >
> >> Q: Why is top-posting evil?
> >> A: .backwards read don't humans because
>
> OK. Everyone that hates top posting please reply with a +1. I'll start.
>
> +1 No top posting please.
I think that who
James wrote:
> KH konstantinhansen.de> writes:
>
>
>
>
>> Q: Why is top-posting evil?
>> A: .backwards read don't humans because
>>
>
> Well, about 98% of linux folks like the
> ease of reading and following the thread
> down the posting. It's also just a standard
> convention, not often
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 April 2009 16:55:31 Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Steven Lembark wrote:
>> > That was the idea, RH did it that way a dozen
>> > years ago for exactly the reason you mention:
>> > dir mods of 027
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Syrewicze wrote:
> I ran emerge -eav system followed by emerge -eav world. Needless to say
> this produced several packages that needed to be rebuilt. 168 for system
> and 630 for world.
>
> My main question is what exactly does the -e option
Hello all,
I followed the gentoo instructions to properly update to the new version
of GCC. I read from other posts that it isn't truly nessecary to
re-emerge any packages for this particular upgrade, but i'm still fairly
new to Gentoo so i figured i'd do it just for the practice.
so anyway,
I r
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 00:12:03 +0200, Sebastian Günther wrote:
> Well: use Xandros to install gentoo.
No gcc, no chroot, no good.
I used eeXbuntu to install mine.
--
Neil Bothwick
Top Oxymorons Number 33: American history
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> >
> > Can anybody help? I hate Xandros, it reminds me of
> Win98!
>
> Well: use Xandros to install gentoo.
Xandros has already used up *all* of the HD on one partition. I can't format
the drive without destroying the OS which is installing it. There isn't even
enough room to download the sn
* maxim wexler (bliss...@yahoo.com) [01.04.09 23:44]:
>
> Hi group,
>
>
> Can anybody help? I hate Xandros, it reminds me of Win98!
Well: use Xandros to install gentoo.
--
" Religion ist das Opium des Volkes. " Karl Marx
s...@sti@N GÜNTHER mailto:sam...@guenther-roetgen.de
p
Hi group,
I posted the following at the sysrescuecd forum but I despair of ever getting a
worthwhile answer:
I've got a tripleE 900A with 4G SSHD running Xandros and I want to use the
sysrescueCD to install gentoo. But I have to be able to use the wifi
driver(ATH5K). There's no problem connec
On Wednesday 01 April 2009, james wrote:
> Reading what I can find about it, I'm not
> sure it is necessary?
>
no
>
> If so, can I renice it or only let it run once and a while,
> it's a drag on system resources
>
>
> ideas?
system-settings, advanced, 'desktop search' deactivate 'enable nepo
KH konstantinhansen.de> writes:
> Q: Why is top-posting evil?
> A: .backwards read don't humans because
Well, about 98% of linux folks like the
ease of reading and following the thread
down the posting. It's also just a standard
convention, not often follow in the windoz
world.
Top postin
> ...
> Ah, postscript works!
> ...
>
> Thanks a lot for the info and I'll
> get to work on a postscript script.
>
> Looks like text2ps might be worth a look.
> http://pwet.fr/man/linux/commandes/text2ps
> I can't find the Gentoo package, but `eix -S postscript` finds a number of
> similar-looking
Reading what I can find about it, I'm not
sure it is necessary?
If so, can I renice it or only let it run once and a while,
it's a drag on system resources
ideas?
James
On 1 Apr 2009, at 17:52, Grant wrote:
...
Ah, postscript works!
...
Thanks a lot for the info and I'll
get to work on a postscript script.
Looks like text2ps might be worth a look.
http://pwet.fr/man/linux/commandes/text2ps
I can't find the Gentoo package, but `eix -S postscript` finds a
n
Florian Philipp schrieb:
> Hi list!
>
> A quick question:
>
> If i install Gentoo on a system with a kernel version 2.6.9 (don't ask
> ...), are there issues I should be aware of?
>
> Do I have to mask newer glibc-versions, newer kernel headers or some use
> flags? What about the nptl use flag?
>>> I have a Brother QL-570 label printer printing on 29x90mm labels. My
>>> goal is to have 6 characters printed across the center of the label.
>>> It prints like this:
>>>
>>> $ echo 123456 | lpr
>>>
>>> but the text is in the upper corner of the label, it has the wrong
>>> orientation, and the
I was only able to test briefly and got it working, but only when i
did it manually.
Seems adding a rmmod line in local.stop doesnt help, I've been trying
to add other lines before like killall -9 mplayer (which is the main
prog using the sound device usually).
I'll be able to work my way! Thanks
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 17:01:15 Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Steven Lembark wrote:
> > The scheme works rather nicely in nearly
> > every situation (POSIX ACL's play hell with
> > the scheme, but, then, they are supposed to).
>
> That being said, is there anyone
Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Steven Lembark wrote:
> > The scheme works rather nicely in nearly
> > every situation (POSIX ACL's play hell with
> > the scheme, but, then, they are supposed to).
> That being said, is there anyone who swears by ACLs here? I've never
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 23:01:15 +0800, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> That being said, is there anyone who swears by ACLs here? I've never
> tried them on (except in a couple of "classroom exercises" years ago),
> so I don't know if they're any joy. Would they allow me to force all
> files under a directo
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 16:55:31 Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Steven Lembark wrote:
> > That was the idea, RH did it that way a dozen
> > years ago for exactly the reason you mention:
> > dir mods of 02770 make it easy to share files
> > but require 002 umask. Fix
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Steven Lembark wrote:
> The scheme works rather nicely in nearly
> every situation (POSIX ACL's play hell with
> the scheme, but, then, they are supposed to).
That being said, is there anyone who swears by ACLs here? I've never
tried them on (except in a couple of
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Steven Lembark wrote:
> That was the idea, RH did it that way a dozen
> years ago for exactly the reason you mention:
> dir mods of 02770 make it easy to share files
> but require 002 umask. Fix was to set the
> per-user group, allowing private dir's (largely
> $HO
Hung Dang wrote:
> Dale wrote:
>
>> Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 1 Apr, Dale wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Hi,
I been trying to upgrade my kernel and I seem to have ran into a huge
mountain. I finally got it to compile but when I try to boot it doesn't
>>
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 1 Apr, Dale wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I been trying to upgrade my kernel and I seem to have ran into a huge
>> mountain. I finally got it to compile but when I try to boot it doesn't
>> recognize my IDE chipset at all. It only sees my CD and DVD but nothing
>> else.
>>
Dale wrote:
> Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
>> On 1 Apr, Dale wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I been trying to upgrade my kernel and I seem to have ran into a huge
>>> mountain. I finally got it to compile but when I try to boot it doesn't
>>> recognize my IDE chipset at all. It only sees my
Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 1 Apr, Dale wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I been trying to upgrade my kernel and I seem to have ran into a huge
>> mountain. I finally got it to compile but when I try to boot it doesn't
>> recognize my IDE chipset at all. It only sees my CD and DVD but nothing
>> else.
>>
2009/4/1 Helmut Jarausch :
> Hi,
>
> dev-util/eclipse-sdk-3.4.1.ebuild from layman/java-overlay
>
> contains
>
> CDEPEND=".
> >=dev-java/tomcat-servlet-api-5.5.25-r1:2.4
>
> What does that mean?
> I have
> dev-java/tomcat-servlet-api-6.0.18
> installed in the 2.5 slot.
> But portage wan
Hi,
dev-util/eclipse-sdk-3.4.1.ebuild from layman/java-overlay
contains
CDEPEND=".
>=dev-java/tomcat-servlet-api-5.5.25-r1:2.4
What does that mean?
I have
dev-java/tomcat-servlet-api-6.0.18
installed in the 2.5 slot.
But portage wants to emerge tomcat-servlet-api-5.5.27 which
is m
On 1 Apr, Dale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I been trying to upgrade my kernel and I seem to have ran into a huge
> mountain. I finally got it to compile but when I try to boot it doesn't
> recognize my IDE chipset at all. It only sees my CD and DVD but nothing
> else.
>
> Here is some info: From lspci:
Maximilian Bräutigam wrote:
> hi,
>
> are you sure that you have configured your kernel correctly according to
> the Gentoo Linux nVidia Guide?
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/nvidia-guide.xml
>
> kind regards,
> der Max
>
Thank you for the reference! I've read the guide and now my combinatio
Hi,
I been trying to upgrade my kernel and I seem to have ran into a huge
mountain. I finally got it to compile but when I try to boot it doesn't
recognize my IDE chipset at all. It only sees my CD and DVD but nothing
else.
Here is some info: From lspci:
00:09.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporat
rt, post the topmost build error, and the call stack
if relevant.
* A complete build log is located at
'/var/log/portage/elog/x11-drivers:nvidia-drivers-173.14.09:20090401-120715.log'.
* The ebuild environment file is located at
'/var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-173.14.09/te
Maximilian Bräutigam schrieb:
> hi,
>
> are you sure that you have configured your kernel correctly according to
> the Gentoo Linux nVidia Guide?
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/nvidia-guide.xml
>
> kind regards,
> der Max
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 01.04.2009, 05:34 -0500 schrieb Dale:
>
>> Maximili
zhen schrieb:
> Hi,
> 5200 is also my card and I have recently tested it with latest nvidia
> driver - it doesn't work with latest stable kernel 2.6.27-r8. I've had
> to roll back to my old nv driver.
>
> Best regards,
> Evgeniy B.
>
> Dale wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I'm trying to upgrade to th
Maximilian Bräutigam wrote:
> hi,
>
> are you sure that you have configured your kernel correctly according to
> the Gentoo Linux nVidia Guide?
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/nvidia-guide.xml
>
> kind regards,
> der Max
>
>
Well, I copied my old config over and ran make oldconfig. I did try
etBUILD_CC)"
> CROSS_COMPILE=${CHOST}- LDFLAGS="$(get_abi_LDFLAGS)" ${BUILD_FIXES}
> ${BUILD_PARAMS} ${BUILD_TARGETS}";
> * The die message:
> * Unable to emake HOSTCC=i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
> CROSS_COMPILE=i686-pc-linux-gnu- LDFLAGS= IGNORE_CC_MISMATCH=yes V=1
> S
pc-linux-gnu-gcc
CROSS_COMPILE=i686-pc-linux-gnu- LDFLAGS= IGNORE_CC_MISMATCH=yes V=1
SYSSRC=/usr/src/linux SYSOUT=/usr/src/linux
HOST_CC=i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc clean module
*
* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack
if relevant.
* A complete build
Hi,
5200 is also my card and I have recently tested it with latest nvidia
driver - it doesn't work with latest stable kernel 2.6.27-r8. I've had
to roll back to my old nv driver.
Best regards,
Evgeniy B.
Dale wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm trying to upgrade to the newer kernel, namely
> gentoo-sourc
zhen wrote:
> Hi,
> 5200 is also my card and I have recently tested it with latest nvidia
> driver - it doesn't work with latest stable kernel 2.6.27-r8. I've had
> to roll back to my old nv driver.
>
> Best regards,
> Evgeniy B.
>
>
Do you, or anyone, know if this is a kernel thing or is this
Dale wrote:
> zhen wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 5200 is also my card and I have recently tested it with latest nvidia
>> driver - it doesn't work with latest stable kernel 2.6.27-r8. I've had
>> to roll back to my old nv driver.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Evgeniy B.
>>
>>
>
> Do you, or anyone, know if this is
44 matches
Mail list logo
