On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Steven Lembark <lemb...@wrkhors.com> wrote: > The scheme works rather nicely in nearly > every situation (POSIX ACL's play hell with > the scheme, but, then, they are supposed to). That being said, is there anyone who swears by ACLs here? I've never tried them on (except in a couple of "classroom exercises" years ago), so I don't know if they're any joy. Would they allow me to force all files under a directory, for instance, to be something like g+rw and at the same time be enrolled in a shared group?
- [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile Mark David Dumlao
- Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile Steven Lembark
- Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile Mark David Dumlao
- Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile Alan McKinnon
- Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/pro... Mark David Dumlao
- Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile Mark David Dumlao
- Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile Neil Bothwick
- Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile Joerg Schilling
- Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile Alan McKinnon
- Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile Alan McKinnon